Article published in:
Translation and the cultural Cold War
Edited by Esmaeil Haddadian-Moghaddam and Giles Scott-Smith
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 15:3] 2020
► pp. 419–440

Interpreting during the Cold War era in Turkey

An exercise in gatekeeping

| Istanbul Atlas University
This article examines the way the Cold War shaped the field of interpreting in Turkey. Turkey became part of the anti-communist bloc, and one outcome of this Turkish-American partnership was the influence that a constellation of American and Turkish organizations exerted on the nascent field of interpreting. Through open-ended interviews with selected interpreters, the article seeks to shed light on the way the Cold War impacted the practice of interpreting. By drawing on Lewin’s (1947) concept of gatekeeping, it is suggested that the US-led anti-communist campaign of the Cold War affected the topics that were interpreted, the common language pairs, and interpreters’ lexical choices. The Cold War, thus, became a “gate” through which the interpreted topics, languages, lexical choices, and even the interpreters – all of which were instruments of the regime – had to pass through.
Keywords: Cold War, interpreting, conference interpreting, ideology, simultaneous interpreting, gatekeeping
Published online: 19 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.20084.arz
References

References

Primary resources

Harvey P. Hail and Eugene P. Northrop
1963 “The Ford Foundation in Turkey: 1952–1962.” February. Ankara: Ford Foundation Report.Google Scholar
The Ford Foundation Annual Report
1956 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969.Google Scholar
The Ford Foundation in Turkey
1963 Ankara.Google Scholar

Recorded interviews

Belgin Dölay
. personal communication 25.062018.Google Scholar
Belkış Çorakçıoğlu-Dışbudak
. personal communication 13.082018.Google Scholar
Fatma Artunkal
. personal communication 12.062018 Google Scholar
Leyla Ayaş
. personal communication 03.072018.Google Scholar
Nur Deriş Ottoman
. personal communication 21.062018.Google Scholar
Okşan Atasoy
. personal communication 02.082018.Google Scholar
Zeynep Bekdik
. personal communication 27.062018.Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Ahmad, Feroz
1993 The Making of Modern Turkey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Richard
2003 “Putting culture into the Cold War: The Cultural Relations Department (CRD) and British covert information warfare.” Intelligence and National Security 18 (2): 109–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arslan Özcan, Lale
2017 “The birth and development of conference interpreting in Turkey.” RIELMA: International Review of Studies in Applied Modern Languages (special issue Interpreting through History): 61–76.Google Scholar
Arzık Erzurumlu, Özüm
2019 “Sözlü çevirinin öncüsü üç kadın çevirmen: Belgin Dölay, Fatma Artunkal, Zeynep Bekdik [Three women pioneers of interpreting: Belgin Dölay, Fatma Artunkal, Zeynep Bekdik].” In Kelimelerin Kıyısında Türkiye’de Kadın Çevirmenler [On the Brink of the Words: Women Interpreters], ed. by Şehnaz Tahir Gürçağlar, 347–370. İstanbul: Ithaki.Google Scholar
Aytürk, İlker
2014 “Nationalism and Islam in Cold War Turkey 1944–69.” Middle Eastern Studies 50 (5): 693–719. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “The flagship institution of Cold War Turcology.” European Journal of Turkish Studies 24. Crossref
Barnhisel, Greg
2015 Cold War Modernists: Art, Literature and American Cultural Diplomacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Stefan
2010 “Ideology and translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, Vol. 3, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc Van Doorslaer, 60–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bezci, Egemen
2016 “Turkey’s intelligence diplomacy during the Second World War.” Journal of Intelligence History 15 (2): 80–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Criss, Nur B.
2007 “Turkish perceptions of the United States.” In What They Think of Us? International Perceptions of the United States since 9/11, ed. by David Farber, 49–74. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Brad
2000 “The interpreter as institutional gatekeeper: The social-linguistic role of interpreters in Spanish-English medical discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (3): 379–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deriş Ottoman, Nur
2004 “From dragomans to interpreters: A brief overview of the profession in Turkey.” aiic.net http://​aiic​.net​/p​/1525. Last accessed 25 May 2018.
Diriker, Ebru
2015 “On the evolution of the interpreting profession in Turkey from dragomans to the 21st century.” In Tradition, Tension and Translation in Turkey, ed. by Şehnaz Tahir Gürçağlar, Saliha Paker, and John Milton, 89–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dlutowski, Christopher J.
1990 “Turkey, the Truman Doctrine, and the Cold War.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 4 (1): 49–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erken, Ali
2016 “Negotiating politics, informal networks and the Ford Foundation Projects in Turkey during the Cold War.” International Journal of Turcologia 11 (21): 5–22.Google Scholar
Erozan, Boğaç
2009 “Turkey and the West: A history of ambivalence.” Orient 50 (3): 4–16.Google Scholar
Flynn, Peter
2007 “Exploring literary translation practice: A focus on ethos.” Target 19 (1): 21–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haddadian-Moghaddam, Esmaeil
2016 “The cultural Cold War and the circulation of world literature: Insights from Franklin Book Programs in Tehran.” Journal of World Literature 1 (3): 371–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hammack, David C. and Steven R. Smith
2018 “Foundations in the United States: Dimensions for international comparison.” American Behavioral Scientist 62 (12): 1603–1638. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katan, David and Fransesco Straniero-Sergio
2003 “Submerged ideologies in media interpreting.” In Apropos of Ideology, ed. by María Calzada Pérez, 131–144. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Kayaoğlu, Barın
2009 “Cold War in the Aegean strategic imperatives, democratic rhetoric: The United States and Turkey 1945–52.” Cold War History 9 (3): 321–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khurana, Rakesh, et al.
2011 “How foundations think: The Ford Foundation as a dominating institution in the field of American business schools.” Harvard Business School Working Paper 11-070. www​.hbs​.edu​/faculty​/Publication%20Files​/11​-070​.pdf. Last accessed 30 August 2020.
Laugesen, Amanda
2010 “The Franklin Book Programs, translation, and the creation of a modern global publishing culture, 1952–1968.” The Princeton University Library Chronicle 71 (2): 168–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Kurt
1947 “Frontiers in group dynamics: II. Channels of group life; Social planning and action research.” Human Relations 1 (2): 143–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Scott
1996 “Campaigns of truth: The Psychological Strategy Board and American ideology, 1951–1953.” The International History Review 18 (2): 279–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, W. Scott
2002 “Mobilizing culture: The state-private network and CIA in the early Cold War. In War and Cold War in American Foreign Policy 1942–62, ed. by Dale Carter, and Robin Clifton, 83–108. New York: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 “Beyond freedom, beyond control, beyond the Cold War: Approaches to American culture and the state-private network.” Intelligence and National Security 18 (2): 53–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Thomas J.
2015 “Counter-subversion in early Cold War Britain: The Official Committee on Communism (Home), the Information Research Department, and ‘state-private networks.’” Intelligence and National Security 30 (5): 637–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Needell, Allan A.
1993 “Truth is our weapon:” Project TROY, political warfare, and government-academic relations in the national security state.” Diplomatic History 17 (3): 399–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oran, Baskın
ed. 2009 Türk Dış Politikası Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar Cilt 1: 1919–1989 [Turkish Foreign Policy Facts, Documents and Comments from the War of Independence onwards Volume 1: 1919–1989]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
Örnek, Cangül and Çağdaş Üngör
eds. 2013 Turkey and the Cold War Ideology and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Örnek, Cangül
2013 “The populist effect: Promotion and reception of American literature in the 1950s.” In Turkey and the Cold War Ideology and Culture, ed. by Cangül Örnek, and Çağdaş Üngör, 130–158. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paker, Saliha
2009 “Turkish tradition.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 550–560. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pakin, Esra
2008 “American Studies in Turkey during the “cultural” Cold War.” Turkish Studies 9 (3): 507–524. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parmar, Inderjeet
2015 “The “Big 3” Foundations and American global power.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74 (4): 676–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Popescu, Monica
2007 “Cold War and hot translation.” Safund: The Journal of South African and American Studies 8 (1): 83–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pöllabauer, Sonja
2012 “Gatekeeping practices in interpreted social media encounters.” Meta 57 (1): 213–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Louise S.
2007 “Publishing American values: The Franklin Book Programs as Cold War cultural diplomacy.” Library Trends 55 (3): 638–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Kenneth W. and Murat Erdem
2000 “American philanthropy in republican Turkey: The Rockefeller and Ford Foundations.” The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations (Special Issue on 200 Years of Turkish-American Relations) 31 (2): 131–157.Google Scholar
Rose, Kenneth W.
2008 “The Rockefeller Foundation’s fellowship program in Turkey, 1925–1983.” www​.issuelab​.org​/resources​/27981​/27981​.pdf. Last accessed 30 August 2020.
Sander, Oral
1979 Türk-Amerikan İlişkileri [Turkish-American Relations]. Ankara: Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi.Google Scholar
Saunders, Frances Stonor
2013 The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Scott-Smith, Giles and Charlotte A. Lerg
2017 “Introduction: Journals of freedom.” In Campaigning Culture and the Global Cold War, ed. by Giles Scott-Smith and Charlotte A. Lerg, 1–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, Pamela J. and Tim P. Vos
2009 Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Singy, Pascal and Patrice Guex
2015 “Gender.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, ed. by Franz Pöchhacker. 169–171. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spolsky, Bernard
2004 Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ülman, Haluk
1968 “Türk dış politikasına yön veren etkenler, 1923–1968” [The Elements Guiding Turkish Foreign Policy]. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi 23 (3): 241–273.Google Scholar
Üsdiken, Behlül
2004 “The French, the German and the American: Higher education for business in Turkey, 1883–2003.” New Perspectives on Turkey (31): 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Transferring American models for education in business and public administration to Turkey, 1950–1970.” In American Turkish Encounters: Politics and Culture, 1830–1989, ed. by Bilge Nur Criss, Selcuk Esenbel, Tony Greenwood, and Louis Mazzari, 316–330. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Tahir Gürçağlar, Şehnaz
2008 The Politics and Poetics of Translation in Turkey 1923–1960. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truman, Henry
1947 “Special message to the Congress on Greece and Turkey.” The American Presidency Project 12 March. www​.presidency​.ucsb​.edu​/node​/232818 Accessed 30 August 2020.
Vardar, Somnur
2019 Bu Kulaklar Neler Duydu: Türkiye’de Konferans Çevirmenliğinin 50 Yılı [The Things I Have Heard: 50 Years of Conference Interpreting in Turkey]. Istanbul: h20 Kitap.Google Scholar
Vuorinen, Erkka
1997 “News translation as gatekeeping.” Translation as Intercultural Communication, 161–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia
1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Westley, Bruce H. and Malcolm S. MacLean
1955 “A conceptual model for communications research.” Audio Visual Communication Review 3 (1): 3–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar