Cover not available
Article published In:
Unpacking Sign Language Interpreting: Special issue of the Journal on Translation and Interpreting Studies 17:3 (2022)
Edited by Hilde Haualand, Maartje De Meulder and Jemina Napier
[Translation and Interpreting Studies 17:3] 2022
► pp. 381–405

Integrated monolingualism and audism governing Spanish Sign-Language users’ self-determination in the legal system

ORCID logo | Universitat Jaume I
ORCID logo | Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Many legal systems have begun to adjust their social and linguistic practices to accommodate non-dominant social groups. However, linguistic diversity is often framed as an exception, and interpreters are viewed as a service to address these exceptions rather than as part of broader structural changes to enable access to justice. This article explores the access to and participation in the Spanish legal system of Spanish Sign-Language users (SSLUs) who are deaf or heard of hearing. Through semi-structured interviews with SSLUs, the article elicits their perceptions of the legal field. These data are analyzed from the perspective of self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan 1985) to identify how SSLUs’ psychological needs of competence, autonomy, and relatedness are linked to the social, cultural, and economic capital invested and distributed through social practices. The goal is to clarify how SSLUs’ habitus sustains or resists monolingual and audist ideologies establishing hierarchies between language communities.
Keywords: social practice, self-determination theory, capital, habitus, monolingualism, audism
Article outline
  • Introduction: The law as cooperation and oppression
  • Monolingualism and audism as oppressive ideologies in the Spanish legal system
  • Power and self-determination in exploring self-oppression
  • Method
  • Results and discussion
    • Cultural capital governing the self-determined habitus
    • Social capital governing self-determination
      • Earning social capital
      • SLI services in capital investment and ideology construction
      • Linking, bonding, and bridging in the legal field
    • Economic capital governing self-determination
  • Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 6 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.21029.mon
References (71)
References
Aldalur, Aileen, Wyatte C. Hall, and Ian A. DeAndrea-Lazarus. 2022. “No taxation without representation: Addressing the “deaf tax” in academic medicine.” Academic Medicine 97(8): 1123–1127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 2014. On the Reproduction of Capitalism. Trans. by Geoffrey M. Goshgarian. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian. 2014. “Monolingual ideologies and multilingual practices in small claims court: The case of Spanish-speaking arbitrators.” International Journal of Multilingualism 11(4): 430–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Colin. 1999. “Sign language and the deaf community.” In Handbook of Language & Ethnic Identity, ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, 122–139. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bao, María. 2012. “La interpretación educativa: ¿Algo más que interpretar?” [Educational interpreting: More than just interpreting?]. Revista de la Fundación Canaria para el Sordo (Funcasor) 41: 10–23.Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma, Pepita Cedillo, and Santiago Frigola. 2019. “Sign languages as resilient endangered languages.” In Transmissions: estudis sobre la transmissió lingüística, ed. by Mónica Barrieras and Carla Ferrerós, 79–100. Vic: Eumo.Google Scholar
Bauman, H-Dirksen L. 2004. “Audism: Exploring the metaphysics of oppression.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9(2): 239–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bienvenu, Martina J. 2016. “Phonocentrism.” In The Sage Deaf Studies Enciclopedia, ed. by Genie Gertz and Patrick Boudreault, 283–284. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Black, Donald. 1976. The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Böser, Ursula. 2016. “Interviews and focus groups.” In Researching Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Claudia Angelelli and Brian Baer, 236–246. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1972. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédée de trois études d’ethnographie kabyle [Outline of a theory of practice, preceded by three studies of Kabyle ethnography]. Geneva: Droz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “La force du droit. Eléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique” [The force of law. Elements for a sociology of the legal field]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 641: 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. La domination masculine [Masculine domination]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Brunson, Jeremy L. 2008. “Your case will now be heard: Sign language interpreters as problematic accommodations in legal interactions.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13(1): 77–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Consumers, colleagues, and certification. Exploring the politics of interpreting.” In Interpreting and the Politics of Recognition, ed. by Christopher Stone and Lorraine Leeson, 99–115. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Fiona A. Kumari. 2008. “Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory.” Disability & Society 23(2): 151–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
De Meulder, Maartje and Hilde Haualand. 2022. “Sign language interpreting services. A quick fix for inclusion?” Translation and Interpreting Studies 16(1): 19–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deci, Edward L. and Richard M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation, ed. by Richard M. Ryan, 85–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Monolingualism of the Other. Trans. by Patrick Mensah. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Jules and Graham H. Turner. 2008. “Sign language interpreters and role conflict in the workplace.” In Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and Dilemmas, ed. by Carmen Valero-Garcés and Anne Martin, 231–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir : naissance de la prison [Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Ed. and trans. by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. and Grant M. Hayden. 2017. American Law. An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazzola, Michele and François Grin. 2013. “Is ELF more effective and fair than translation? An evaluation of the EU’s multilingual regime.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 23(1): 93–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gertz, Genie. 2008. “Dysconscious audism: A theoretical proposition.” In Open Your Eyes. Deaf Studies Talking, ed. by H-Dirksen L. Bauman, 219–234. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gezairy, Hussein A. 2007. Address to the Regional Consultation on Establishing Regional Guidelines on Management and Care of Hearing Loss. World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region (Cairo).Google Scholar
Gogolin, Ingrid. 1994. Der monolinguale Habitus der multilingualen Schule [The monolingual habitus of the multilingual school]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Linguistic habitus.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown, 194–196. Boston: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramling, David. 2016. The Invention of Monolingualism. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2022. “On reelecting monolingualism: Fortification, fragility, and stamina.” Applied Linguistics Review 13(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1999. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Trans. by Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. London: ElecBook.Google Scholar
Halpern, David. 2005. Social Capital. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Haualand, Hilde. 2012. “Video interpreting services: Calls for inclusion or redialling exclusion?” Ethnos 79(2): 287–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. “Punished and isolated: Disabled prisoners in Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 17(sup 1): 74–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Tom. 1975. “Audism: The making of a word.” Unpublished essay. [URL]
. 1977. “Communicating across cultures (deaf/hearing) and language learning.” Unpublished PhD, Union Graduate School.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 2018. Cultural Evolution: People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 1999. “Locating power: Corsican translators and their critics.” In Language Ideological Debates, ed. by Jan Blommaert, 39–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarque, Maria Josep, Marta Bosch-Baliarda, and Menchu González. 2019. “Legal recognition and regulation of Catalan Sign Language.” In The Legal Recognition of Sign Languages, ed. by Maartje De Meulder, Joseph J. Murray, and Rachel L. McKee, 268–283. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Joyce. 1998. “Dysconscious racism: The cultural politics of critiquing ideology and identity.” In Critical White Studies: Looking Behind the Mirror, ed. by Richard Delegado and Jean Stefancic, 128–132. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Koskinen, Kaisa. 2008. Translating Institutions: An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Krausneker, Verena. 2015. “Ideologies and attitudes toward sign languages: An approximation.” Sign Language Studies 15(4): 411–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kusters, Annelies, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien. 2017. “Innovations in Deaf Studies: Critically mapping the field.” In Innovations in Deaf Studies, ed. by Annelies Kusters, Maartje De Meulder, and Dai O’Brien, 1–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, Paddy. 2007. “Hearing-impaired or British Sign Language users? Social policies and the deaf community.” Disability, Handicap & Society 3(2): 195–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Yaojun, Mike Savage, and Alan Warde. 2008. “Social mobility and social capital in contemporary Britain.” British Journal of Sociology 59(3): 391–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1994. “Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in courts.” Language in Society 23(2): 163–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loeffler, Summer. 2014. “Deaf music: Embodying language and rhythm.” In Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, ed. by H-Dirksen L. Bauman and Joseph J. Murray, 436–456. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil. 2002. The Sociolinguistics of Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marín Perabá, Cristina. 2019. “Enfoques educativos de la concepción de integración e inclusión” [Educational approaches to the concept of integration and inclusion]. Revista Internacional de Apoyo a la Inclusión, Logopedia, Sociedad y Multiculturalidad 5(1): 115–124.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1867. Das Kapital. Hamburg: Otto Meissner.Google Scholar
May, Stephen. 2012. Language and Minority Rights. Ethnicity, Nationalism and the Politics of Language. 2nd Ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D. 2020. “Positionality in public service interpreting research.” FITISPos 71: 92–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina. 2004. “Sign language interpreter training, testing, and accreditation: An international comparison.” American Annals of the Deaf 149(4): 350–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Senra, Belén. 2019. “La interpretación en lengua de signos: una cuestión de rol” [Court interpreting in sign language: A question of role]. Revista de Llengua i Dret 711: 73–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putman, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone – The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2012. “Legal pathways to the recognition of Sign Languages: A comparison of the Catalan and Spanish Sign Language Acts.” Sign Language Studies 12(4): 565–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reagan, Timothy G. 2010. Language Policy and Planning for Sign Languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Richard M. 1995. “Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes.” Journal of Personality 631: 397–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Richard M. and Edward L. Deci. 2017. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: The Guilford Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheneman, Naomi and Octavian E. Robinson. 2021. “Helpers, professional authority, and pathologized bodies: Ableism in interpretation and translation.” In Translating Asymmetry / Rewriting Power, ed. by Ovidi Carbonell i Cortés and Esther Monzó-Nebot, 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955[2014]. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther. 1989. Recht als autopoietisches System [Law as an autopoietic system]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp-Verlag.Google Scholar
Torres Rangel, Moraima. 2009. “El proceso de la escritura en estudiantes adolescentes sordos” [The writing process in deaf adolescent students]. Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Inclusiva 3(1): 113–131.Google Scholar
Turner, Graham H. 2009. “Sign language planning: Pragmatism, pessimism and principles.” Current Issues in Language Planning 10(3): 243–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Richard M. Ryan, and Bart Soenens. 2020. “Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions.” Motivation and Emotion 44(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varner, Iris I. and Katrin Varner. 2014. “The relationship between culture and legal systems and the impact on intercultural business communication.” Global Advances in Business Communication 3(1): Article 3.Google Scholar
Wallace, Melissa and Esther Monzó-Nebot. 2019. “Legal translation and interpreting in public services: Defining key issues, re-examining policies, and locating the public in public service interpreting and translation.” Revista de Llengua i Dret 711: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winston, Elizabeth A. 2005. “Designing a curriculum for American Sign Language/English interpreting educators.” In Educational Interpreting and Interpreting Education, ed. by Marc Marschark, Rico Peterson, and Elizabeth A. Winston, 208–233. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Alys, Jemina Napier, and Rosemary Oram. 2020. “The translated deaf self, ontological (in)security and deaf culture.” The Translator 25(4): 349–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Monzó-Nebot, Esther & Cristina R. Álvarez-Álvarez
2024. Healthcare interpreters X, Y, Z. Translation Spaces 13:1 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.