Baayen, R. H., D. J. Davidson, and D. M. Bates
2008 “Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.” Journal of Memory and Language 59(4): 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker
2015 “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 671: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellassen, J., and Pengpeng Zhang
1997A Key to Chinese Speech and Writing. Beijing: Sinolingua.Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne, and Jairo Buitrago Ciro
2019Machine Translation and Global Research: Towards Improved Machine Translation Literacy in the Scholarly Community. Bingley, UK: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Chia-chien, and Masaru Yamada
2021 “Translation tasks for learning collocations: Effects of machine translation plus post-editing and sight translation.” English Teaching & Learning 45(1): 27–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Pi-Chuan, Michel Galley, and Christopher D. Manning
2008 “Optimizing Chinese word segmentation for machine translation performance.” In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation – StatMT ’08, 224–32. Columbus, OH: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Hsin-hsi
1994 “Contextual analysis of Chinese sentences with punctuation marks.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 9(4): 281–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Joan, Lisa Merschel, and Joan Munné
2013 “Surveying the landscape – What is the role of machine translation in language learning.” @tic. Revista d’innovació Educativa 101: 108–21.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob
1988Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Correa, Maite
2014 “Leaving the “peer” out of peer-editing: Online translators as a pedagogical tool in the Spanish as a second language classroom.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 7(1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cui, Songren, and Kuo-ming Sung
2022 “Directional complement.” In A Reference Grammar for Teaching Chinese: Syntax and Discourse, ed. by Songren Cui and Kuo-ming Sung, 447–89. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse
2010 “What counts as useful advice in a university post-editing training context? Report on a case study.” In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation. St Raphaël, France. [URL]
Dorst, Aletta G., Susana Valdez, and Heather Bouman
ELIS Research
2023 “European Language Industry Survey 2023: Trends, Expectations and Concerns of the European Language Industry.” 10. ELIS. ELIA, EMT, EUATC, FIT Europe, GALA, LIND, Women in Localization. [URL]
Fonseca, Norma, and Fabio Alves
2016 “Assessing complexity and difficulty levels of machine-translated texts.” Letras & Letras 32(1): 306–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García, Ignacio, and María Isabel Pena
2011 “Machine translation-assisted language learning: Writing for beginners.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 24(5): 471–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groves, Mike, and Klaus Mundt
2021 “A ghostwriter in the machine? Attitudes of academic staff towards machine translation use in internationalised higher education.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 501: article 100957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerberof-Arenas, Ana, and Joss Moorkens
2019 “Machine translation and post-editing training as part of a master’s programme.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 311: 217–38.Google Scholar
Hu, Ke, and Patrick Cadwell
2016 “A comparative study of post-editing guidelines.” Baltic Journal of Modern Computing 4 (2): 346–53.Google Scholar
ISO 18587
2017Translation Services – Post-Editing of Machine Translation Output – Requirements. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
Jensen, Kristian T. H.
2009 “Indicators of text complexity.” In Behind the Mind: Methods, Models and Results in Translation Process Research, ed. by Susanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 61–80. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
Jia, Yanfang, Michael Carl, and Xiangling Wang
2019a “How does the post-editing of neural machine translation compare with from-scratch translation.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 311: 60–86.Google Scholar
2019b “Post-editing neural machine translation versus phrase-based machine translation for English–Chinese.” Machine Translation 33(1–2): 9–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, Yanfang, and Binghan Zheng
2022 “The interaction effect between source text complexity and machine translation quality on the task difficulty of NMT post-editing from English to Chinese: A multi-method study.” Across Languages and Cultures 23(1): 36–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klimova, Blanka, Marcel Pikhart, Alice Delorme Benites, Caroline Lehr, and Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer
2023 “Neural machine translation in foreign language teaching and learning: A systematic review.” Education and Information Technologies 281: 663–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Läubli, Samuel, Chantal Amrhein, Patrick Düggelin, Beatriz Gonzalez, Alena Zwahlen, and Martin Volk
2019 “Post-editing productivity with neural machine translation: An empirical assessment of speed and quality in the banking and finance domain.” arXiv. [URL]
Li, Xiaoshi
2010 “Sociolinguistic variation in the speech of learners of Chinese as a second language.” Language Learning 60(2): 366–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Baolin, Zhongning Wang, and Zhixing Jin
2010 “The effects of punctuations in Chinese sentence comprehension: An ERP study.” Journal of Neurolinguistics 23(1): 66–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lommel, Arle
2018 “Metrics for translation quality assessment: A case for standardising error typologies.” In Translation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice, ed. by Joss Moorkens, Sheila Castilho, Federico Gaspari, and Stephen Doherty, 109–27. Cham: Springer International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D.
2017 “Translators and machine translation: Knowledge and skills gaps in translator pedagogy.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 11(4): 280–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson
2017Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miyata, Rei, and Atsushi Fujita
2021 “Understanding pre-editing for black-box neural machine translation.” In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume, 1539–50. EACL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moorkens, Joss
2018 “What to expect from neural machine translation: A practical in-class translation evaluation exercise.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 12(4): 375–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niño, Ana
2008 “Evaluating the use of machine translation post-editing in the foreign language class.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 21(1): 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Machine translation in foreign language learning: Language learners’ and tutors’ perceptions of its advantages and disadvantages.” ReCALL 21(2): 241–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Exploring the use of online machine translation for independent language learning.” Research in Learning Technology 281: article 2402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon
2021 “Post-editing.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, vol. 51, ed. by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 178–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2022 “How to deal with errors in machine translation: Post-editing.” In Machine Translation for Everyone: Empowering Users in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, ed. by Dorothy Kenny, 105–20. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Plitt, Mirko, and François Masselot
2010 “A productivity test of statistical machine translation post-editing in a typical localisation context.” The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 931: 7–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2023 “R: The R Project for Statistical Computing” 2023 [URL]
Rico Pérez, Celia
2024 “Re-thinking machine translation post-editing guidelines.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 411: 26–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rico, Celia, and Diana González Pastor
2022 “The role of machine translation in translation education: A thematic analysis of translator educators’ beliefs.” Translation & Interpreting 14(1): 177–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Gijón, Pilar, and Olga Torres-Hostench
2014 “MT post-editing into the mother tongue or into a foreign language? Spanish-to-English MT translation output post-edited by translation trainees.” In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, 5–19. Vancouver, Canada: AMTA.Google Scholar
Screen, Ben
2017 “Machine translation and Welsh: Analysing free statistical machine translation for the professional.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 281: 317–44.Google Scholar
Somers, H. L.
2000 “Machine translation in the classroom.” In Computers and Translation: A Translator’s Guide, ed. by H. L. Sommers, 319–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen
2006Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Machine translation postediting guidelines.” [URL]
Toral, Antonio, and Andy Way
2018 “What level of quality can neural machine translation attain on literary text?’ In Translation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice, ed. by Joss Moorkens, Sheila Castilho, Federico Gaspari, and Stephen Doherty, 263–87. Cham: Springer International. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vardaro, Jennifer, Moritz Schaeffer, and Silvia Hansen-Schirra
2019 “Translation quality and error recognition in professional neural machine translation post-editing.” Informatics 6(3): article 41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xiangling, Tingting Wang, Ricardo Muñoz Martín, and Yanfang Jia
2021 “Investigating usability in postediting neural machine translation: Evidence from translation trainees’ self-perception and performance.” Across Languages and Cultures 22(1): 100–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yining, Long Zhou, Jiajun Zhang, and Chengqing Zong
2017 “Word, subword or character? An empirical study of granularity in Chinese-English NMT.” In Machine Translation, ed. by Derek F. Wong and Deyi Xiong, 30–42. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Masaru
2019 “The impact of google neural machine translation on post-editing by student translators.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 311: 81–106.Google Scholar
Yang, Jizhou
ed. 2016Chinese Course. 3rd ed. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Hong, and Olga Torres-Hostench
2022 “Training in machine translation post-editing for foreign language students.” Language Learning & Technology 26(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qi, and Zhouxiang Lu
2014 “The writing of Chinese characters by CFL learners: Can writing on Facebook and using machine translation help?Language Learning in Higher Education 4(2): 441–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhen, Yu-Yao, Ya-Ning Wu, Guang-Ming Yu, and Chun-Ping Zheng
2021 “A review study of the application of machine translation in education from 2011 to 2020.” In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computers in Education, ed. by Maria Mercedes T. Rodrigo, Sridhar Iyer, and Antonija Mitrovic, 17–24. Bangkok, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (APSCE).Google Scholar