This article focuses on the occupational status of translators in international organizations. It reports on an empirical study on the job status of Danish staff translators working in the European Union as compared to that of Danish staff translators working in the national market. The study is based on data from questionnaires completed by 63 EU translators and 113 national-market translators, i.e., a total of 176 respondents. The translators’ perceptions of their occupational status were studied and compared through their responses to questions revolving around four parameters of occupational prestige: (1) remuneration, (2) education and expertise, (3) power and influence, and (4) visibility. Based on the literature, we hypothesized that the EU translators would enjoy a higher status than the national-market translators — a hypothesis which the study failed to confirm. In the article, the analyses and findings of the study are discussed, along with the possible reasons for the lack of alignment between the hypothesis and the results.
2024. Mapping Salience and Trajectory: On How to Situate Literary Translators in Publishing Legends of the Condor Heroes With Visualization. Sage Open 14:2
2022. Comparative research into translator status: Finland and Sweden as a case in point. Perspectives 30:5 ► pp. 859 ff.
COŞKUN, Özge & Gülfer TUNALI
2020. LOW SOCIAL STATUS, HIGH INDIVIDUAL STATUS: TURKISH TRANSLATORS IN THE STATE AND PRIVATE SECTORS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 22:4 ► pp. 1427 ff.
Lindqvist, Yvonne
2020. Translation bibliomigrancy: the case of contemporary French Caribbean literature in Sweden. Meta 64:3 ► pp. 600 ff.
2019. Where do we stand?. FORUM. Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation 17:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Gaspari, Federico
2015. Exploring Expo Milano 2015: a cross-linguistic comparison of food-related phraseology in translation using acomparallelcorpus approach. The Translator 21:3 ► pp. 327 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.