Antia, Bassey E., Gerhard Budin, Heribert Picht, Margaret Rogers, Klaus-Dirk Schmitz, and Sue Ellen Wright
2005“Shaping Translation: A View from Terminology Research.” Meta 50 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa, and Antonio Damasio
2008“Embodied Semantics for Actions: Findings from Functional Brain Imaging.” Journal of Physiology – Paris 102 (1-3): 35–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W
2003“Situated Simulation in the Human Conceptual System.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005“Situated Conceptualization.” In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ed. by Henri Cohen, and Claire Lefebvre, 619–650. St. Louis: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008“Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009“Simulation, Situated Conceptualization, and Prediction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364 (1521): 1281–1289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Lynne, and Jennifer Pearson
2002Working with Specialized Language. A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budin, Gerhard
1994“Some Hypotheses about Concept Representations.” In Applications and Implications of Current LSP Research, ed. by Magnar Brekke et al. (eds), Proceedings 9th European Symposium on LSP , 919–924. Bergen.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas, and Stephen C. Levinson
2008“Language and Landscape: A Crosslinguistic Perspective.” Language Sciences 30: 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabré, María Teresa
1999Terminology. Theory, Methods and Applications, ed. by Juan C. Sager, and translated by Janet Ann DeCesaris. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, and Bradford Z. Mahon
2003“The Organization of Conceptual Knowledge: The Evidence from Category-Specific Semantic Deficits”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (8): 354–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, and Jennifer R. Shelton
1998“Domain-specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowardin, Lewis M., Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet, and Edward T. LaRoe
1979Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1994Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio, and Hanna Damasio
1994“Cortical Systems for Retrieval of Concrete Knowledge: The Convergence Zone Framework”. In Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, ed. by Christof Koch, and Joel Davis, 61–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diki-Kidiri, Marcel
(ed.) 2008Le vocabulaire scientifique dans les langues africaines. Pour une approche culturelle de la terminologie. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela
(ed.) 2012A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Knowledge. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Pilar León-Araúz, Juan Antonio Prieto Velasco, and Arianne Reimerink
2007 “Linking Images and Words: The Description of Specialized Concepts.” International Journal of Lexicography 20: 39–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Silvia Montero, María Rosa Castro, José Senso, Juan Antonio Prieto Velasco, Pilar León-Araúz, Carlos Márquez Linares, and Miguel Vega Expósito
Faber, Pamela, Carlos Márquez Linares, and Miguel Vega Expósito
2005 “Framing Terminology: A Process-Oriented Approach.” Meta 50 (4).Google Scholar
Feliu, Judit
2004Relacions conceptuals I terminologia: analisi i proposta de deteccio semiautomatica. Ph.D. thesis, Barcelona: IULA-UPF.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J
1982“Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
1985“Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”, Quaderni di Semántica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and Beryl T. Sue Atkins
1992“Towards a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of Risk and its Neighbors”. In Frames, Fields and Contrasts, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer, and Eva Feder Kittay, 75–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freixa, Judit
2002La variació terminològica: anàlisi de la variació denominativa en textos de diferent grau d’especialització de l’àrea de medi ambient. Ph.D. thesis, Barcelona: IULA-UPF.Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio, and George Lakoff
2005 “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge”. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3/4): 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hails, A.J
(ed.) 1997Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.Google Scholar
Holt, Lauren E., and Sian L. Beilock
2006“Expertise and its Embodiment: Examining the Impact of Sensorimotor Skill Expertise on the Representation of Action-Related Text”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 694–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
2006“Text and Context in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 338–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Glyn W., and Emer M.E. Forde
2001“Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: ‘Category Specific’ Neuropsychological Deficits.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 453–459.Google Scholar
Kageura, Kyo
2002The Dynamics of Terminology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S
1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2001“Dynamicity in Grammar.” Axiomathes 12: 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar, Arianne Reimerink, and Alejandro G. Aragón
2013“Dynamism and Context in Specialized Knowledge.” Terminology 19 (1): 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar, and Pamela Faber
2010“Natural and Contextual Constraints for Domain-Specific Relations.” In Proceedings of the Workshop Semantic Relations. Theory and Applications, ed. by Verginica Barbu Mititelu, Viktor Pekar, and Eduard Barbu, 12–17. Valletta.Google Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar
2009Representación multidimensional de conocimiento especializado. Ph.D. thesis, Granada: University of Granada.Google Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar, and Pedro Magaña
2010 “EcoLexicon: Contextualizing an Environmental Ontology.” In Proceedings of the Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Conference (TKE) . Dublin: Dublin City University CD-ROM.
León-Araúz, Pilar, Pedro Magaña, and Pamela Faber
2009“Building the SISE: An Environmental Ontology.” In Proceedings of the European Conference Towards eEnvironment, ed. by Jiří Hřebíček, Jiří Hradec, Emil Pelikán, Ondřej Mírovský, Werner Pilmann, Ivan Holoubek, and Thomas Bandholtz, 16–23. Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
2008 “Landscape, Seascape and the Ontology of Places on Rossel Island, Papua New Guinea.” Language Sciences 30 (2/3): 256–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, Max, and Patrick Jeuniaux
2010“The Linguistic and Embodied Nature of Conceptual Processing.” Cognition 114: 96–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, Bradford Z., and Alfonso Caramazza
2008“A Critical Look at the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis and a New Proposal for Grounding Conceptual Content”. Journal of Physiology – Paris 102: 59–70 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009“Concepts and Categories: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 60: 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mark, David M., Barry Smith, and Barbara Tversky
1999“Ontology and Geographic Objects: An Empirical Study of Cognitive Categorization.” In Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, ed. by Christian Freksa, and David M. Mark, 283–298. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mark, David M., Andrew G. Turk, and David Stea
2010“Ethnophysiography of Arid Lands – Categories for Landscape Features.” In Landscape Ethnoecology: Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space, ed. by Leslie Main Johnson, and Eugene S. Hunn, 27–48, New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Martin, Alex
2007“The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Ingrid, Karen Eck, and Douglas Skuce
1997“Systematic Concept Analysis within a Knowledge-Based Approach to Terminology.” In Handbook of Terminology Management, ed. by Sue Ellen Wright, and Gerhard Budin, 98–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitsch, William J
2009Wetland Ecosystems. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mitsch, William J., and James G. Gosselink
2011Wetlands. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
National Wetlands Working Group
1997The Canadian Wetland Classification System: A Revision of the Wetlands of Canada, ed. by Barry G. Warner, and Clayton D.A. Rubec. Waterloo: Wetlands Research Centre, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Nuopponen, Anita
1994“Causal Relations in Terminological Knowledge Representation.” Terminology Science and Research 5 (1): 36–44.Google Scholar
Oeser, Erhard, and Gerhard Budin
1995“Controlled Conceptual Dynamics: From Ordinary Language to Scientific Terminology – and back.” Terminology Science and Research 6 (2): 3–17.Google Scholar
Patterson, Karalyn, Peter J. Nestor, and Timothy T. Rogers
2007“Where Do You Know What You Know? The Representation of Semantic Knowledge in the Human Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 976–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Silvia, and Diane Nolet
2001Handbook of Terminology. Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services.Google Scholar
Pilke, Nina
2001“Field-Specific Features of Dynamic Concepts – What, When and Why?” In Language for Special Purposes: Perspective for the New Millennium, I, ed. by Felix Mayer, 239–246. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Pozzi, María
1999“The Concept of ‘Concept’ in Terminology: A Need for a New Approach.” In TKE’99 Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Proceedings, ed. by Peter Sandrini, Fifth International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering , Vienna: TermNet.Google Scholar
Puuronen, Nina
1995“On Describing Dynamic Concepts – A Philosophical and Terminological Approach.” In ITTF Proceedings of the 10th European LSP Symposium, II , ed. by Gerhard Budin, 1093–1102. Vienna, TermNet.
Raizada, Rajeev D.S., Todd L. Richards, Andrew Meltzoff, and Patricia K. Kuhl
2008“Socioeconomic Status Predicts Hemispheric Specialisation of the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Young Children.” Neuroimage 40 (3): 1392–1401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds Losin, Elizabeth, Miraella Dapretto, and Marco Iacoboni
2010“Culture and Neuroscience: Additive or Synergistic.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5 (2-3): 148–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Margaret
2004“Multidimensionality in Concepts Systems.” Terminology 10 (2): 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1978“Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch, and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simmons, W. Kyle, Alex Martin, and Lawrence W. Barsalou
2005“Pictures of Appetizing Foods Activate Gustatory Cortices for Taste and Reward.” Cerebral Cortex 15: 1602–1608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barry, and David Mark
1998“Ontology and Geographic Kinds.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH’98), ed. by Thomas K. Poiker, and Nick Chrisman, 308–320. Vancouver: International Geographical Union.Google Scholar
1999“Ontology with Human Subjects Testing: an Empirical Investigation of Geographic Categories.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 582: 245–272.Google Scholar
2001“Geographic Categories: An Ontological Investigation.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15 (7): 591–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003“Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (3): 411–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, Ramesh, Alberto Pepe, and Marko A. Rodriguez
2009“A Clustering-based Semi-automated Technique to Build Cultural Ontologies.” Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 60 (3): 608–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008“Sociocultural Situatedness of Terminology in the Life Sciences: The History of Splicing. In Language and Mind II. Interrelations between Biology, Linguistics and Culture, ed. by Roslyn Frank, René Dirven, Jordan Zlatev, and Tom Ziemke, 327–360. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Tucker Mike, and Rob Ellis
1998“On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 830–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001“The Potentiation of Grasp Types during Visual Object Categorization.” Visual Cognition 8: 769–800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Sue Ellen
2003“From the Semiotic Triangle to the Semantic Web.” Journal of the International Institute for Terminology Research 14: 111–135.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Dahm, Maria R.
2018. A socio-cognitive investigation of English medical terminology: dynamic varieties of meaning. Lexicography 4:1  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
2018. La terminología de la gastronomía puertorriqueña: reflexiones en torno a su trasfondo y representación. CLINA: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Traducción, Interpretación y Comunicación Intercultural 4:2  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Faber, Pamela & M. Carmen África Vidal Claramonte
2017. Food terminology as a system of cultural communication. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 23:1  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Freixa, Judit & Sabela Fernández-Silva
2017. Chapter 7. Terminological variation and the unsaturability of concepts. In Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 18],  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Joan Casademont, Anna
2018. Variation dénominative avec conséquences cognitives : quelques exemples détectés autour de « musée ». Meta 63:2  pp. 444 ff. DOI logo
Li, Biwei
2023. Conceptual deviation in terminology translation. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29:2  pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Mi, Tian & Rodrigo Muñoz Cabrera
2020. ¿Numerales que atraviesan la barrera lingüística? Un estudio práctico de la traducción del 9 del chino al español por medio del Corpus CCEVAO. Estudios de Traducción 10  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Vintar, Špela & Matej Martinc
2022. Framing karstology. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 28:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.