Cover not available
Part of
Dynamics and Terminology: An interdisciplinary perspective on monolingual and multilingual culture-bound communication
Edited by Rita Temmerman and Marc Van Campenhoudt
[Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 16] 2014
► pp. 135–158

7. Specialized knowledge dynamics

From cognition to culture-bound terminology

ORCID logo | Universidad de Granada
 | Universidad de Granada
This chapter examines the multidimensional representation of specialized concepts and concept systems within the context of new theories of simulated cognition and culture-bound terminology. According to the premises of Frame-based Terminology (Faber et al. 2005; Faber et al. 2006; Faber et al. 2007), conceptualization is regarded as a dynamic process that is modulated by human perception. In addition, conceptual categories previously thought to be universal (e.g. natural geographic entities), are also shown to be constrained by cultural perceptions. Contextual information related to situational simulation and culture is thus used to configure specialized domains on the basis of definitional templates and situated representations for specialized knowledge concepts.
Published online: 3 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.16.08fab
References (73)
Antia, Bassey E., Gerhard Budin, Heribert Picht, Margaret Rogers, Klaus-Dirk Schmitz, and Sue Ellen Wright. 2005. “Shaping Translation: A View from Terminology Research.” Meta 50 (4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa, and Antonio Damasio. 2008. “Embodied Semantics for Actions: Findings from Functional Brain Imaging.” Journal of Physiology – Paris 102 (1-3): 35–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2003. “Situated Simulation in the Human Conceptual System.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 513–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Situated Conceptualization.” In Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, ed. by Henri Cohen, and Claire Lefebvre, 619–650. St. Louis: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Simulation, Situated Conceptualization, and Prediction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364 (1521): 1281–1289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Lynne, and Jennifer Pearson. 2002. Working with Specialized Language. A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budin, Gerhard. 1994. “Some Hypotheses about Concept Representations.” In Applications and Implications of Current LSP Research, ed. by Magnar Brekke et al. (eds), Proceedings 9th European Symposium on LSP , 919–924. Bergen.Google Scholar
Burenhult, Niclas, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2008. “Language and Landscape: A Crosslinguistic Perspective.” Language Sciences 30: 135–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabré, María Teresa. 1999. Terminology. Theory, Methods and Applications, ed. by Juan C. Sager, and translated by Janet Ann DeCesaris. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Elements for a Theory of Terminology: Towards and Alternative Paradigm.” Terminology 6 (1): 35–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, and Bradford Z. Mahon. 2003. “The Organization of Conceptual Knowledge: The Evidence from Category-Specific Semantic Deficits”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (8): 354–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, Alfonso, and Jennifer R. Shelton. 1998. “Domain-specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10: 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowardin, Lewis M., Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet, and Edward T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Online.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio, and Hanna Damasio. 1994. “Cortical Systems for Retrieval of Concrete Knowledge: The Convergence Zone Framework”. In Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain, ed. by Christof Koch, and Joel Davis, 61–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diki-Kidiri, Marcel (ed.). 2008. Le vocabulaire scientifique dans les langues africaines. Pour une approche culturelle de la terminologie. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela (ed.). 2012. A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Knowledge. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Pilar León-Araúz, Juan Antonio Prieto Velasco, and Arianne Reimerink. 2007. “Linking Images and Words: The Description of Specialized Concepts.” International Journal of Lexicography 20: 39–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Silvia Montero, María Rosa Castro, José Senso, Juan Antonio Prieto Velasco, Pilar León-Araúz, Carlos Márquez Linares, and Miguel Vega Expósito. 2006. “Process-Oriented Terminology Management in the Domain of Coastal Engineering.” Terminology 12 (2): 189–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Pamela, Carlos Márquez Linares, and Miguel Vega Expósito. 2005. “Framing Terminology: A Process-Oriented Approach.” Meta 50 (4).Google Scholar
Feliu, Judit. 2004. Relacions conceptuals I terminologia: analisi i proposta de deteccio semiautomatica. Ph.D. thesis, Barcelona: IULA-UPF.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding”, Quaderni di Semántica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and Beryl T. Sue Atkins. 1992. “Towards a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of Risk and its Neighbors”. In Frames, Fields and Contrasts, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer, and Eva Feder Kittay, 75–102. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Freixa, Judit. 2002. La variació terminològica: anàlisi de la variació denominativa en textos de diferent grau d’especialització de l’àrea de medi ambient. Ph.D. thesis, Barcelona: IULA-UPF.Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio, and George Lakoff. 2005. “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-Motor System in Conceptual Knowledge”. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22 (3/4): 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hails, A.J. (ed.). 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.Google Scholar
Holt, Lauren E., and Sian L. Beilock. 2006. “Expertise and its Embodiment: Examining the Impact of Sensorimotor Skill Expertise on the Representation of Action-Related Text”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13: 694–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane. 2006. “Text and Context in Translation.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 338–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Glyn W., and Emer M.E. Forde. 2001. “Hierarchies, Similarity, and Interactivity in Object Recognition: ‘Category Specific’ Neuropsychological Deficits.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 453–459.Google Scholar
Kageura, Kyo. 2002. The Dynamics of Terminology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2001. “Dynamicity in Grammar.” Axiomathes 12: 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar, Arianne Reimerink, and Alejandro G. Aragón. 2013. “Dynamism and Context in Specialized Knowledge.” Terminology 19 (1): 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar, and Pamela Faber. 2010. “Natural and Contextual Constraints for Domain-Specific Relations.” In Proceedings of the Workshop Semantic Relations. Theory and Applications, ed. by Verginica Barbu Mititelu, Viktor Pekar, and Eduard Barbu, 12–17. Valletta.Google Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar. 2009. Representación multidimensional de conocimiento especializado. Ph.D. thesis, Granada: University of Granada.Google Scholar
León-Araúz, Pilar, and Pedro Magaña. 2010. “EcoLexicon: Contextualizing an Environmental Ontology.” In Proceedings of the Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Conference (TKE) . Dublin: Dublin City University CD-ROM.
León-Araúz, Pilar, Pedro Magaña, and Pamela Faber. 2009. “Building the SISE: An Environmental Ontology.” In Proceedings of the European Conference Towards eEnvironment, ed. by Jiří Hřebíček, Jiří Hradec, Emil Pelikán, Ondřej Mírovský, Werner Pilmann, Ivan Holoubek, and Thomas Bandholtz, 16–23. Brno, Czech Republic: Masaryk University.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2008. “Landscape, Seascape and the Ontology of Places on Rossel Island, Papua New Guinea.” Language Sciences 30 (2/3): 256–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Louwerse, Max, and Patrick Jeuniaux. 2010. “The Linguistic and Embodied Nature of Conceptual Processing.” Cognition 114: 96–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahon, Bradford Z., and Alfonso Caramazza. 2008. “A Critical Look at the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis and a New Proposal for Grounding Conceptual Content”. Journal of Physiology – Paris 102: 59–70 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Concepts and Categories: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 60: 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mark, David M., Barry Smith, and Barbara Tversky. 1999. “Ontology and Geographic Objects: An Empirical Study of Cognitive Categorization.” In Spatial Information Theory. Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, ed. by Christian Freksa, and David M. Mark, 283–298. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mark, David M., Andrew G. Turk, and David Stea. 2010. “Ethnophysiography of Arid Lands – Categories for Landscape Features.” In Landscape Ethnoecology: Concepts of Biotic and Physical Space, ed. by Leslie Main Johnson, and Eugene S. Hunn, 27–48, New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Martin, Alex. 2007. “The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Ingrid, Karen Eck, and Douglas Skuce. 1997. “Systematic Concept Analysis within a Knowledge-Based Approach to Terminology.” In Handbook of Terminology Management, ed. by Sue Ellen Wright, and Gerhard Budin, 98–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitsch, William J. 2009. Wetland Ecosystems. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mitsch, William J., and James G. Gosselink. 2011. Wetlands. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
National Wetlands Working Group. 1997. The Canadian Wetland Classification System: A Revision of the Wetlands of Canada, ed. by Barry G. Warner, and Clayton D.A. Rubec. Waterloo: Wetlands Research Centre, University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
Nuopponen, Anita. 1994. “Causal Relations in Terminological Knowledge Representation.” Terminology Science and Research 5 (1): 36–44.Google Scholar
Oeser, Erhard, and Gerhard Budin. 1995. “Controlled Conceptual Dynamics: From Ordinary Language to Scientific Terminology – and back.” Terminology Science and Research 6 (2): 3–17.Google Scholar
Patterson, Karalyn, Peter J. Nestor, and Timothy T. Rogers. 2007. “Where Do You Know What You Know? The Representation of Semantic Knowledge in the Human Brain.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 976–988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavel, Silvia, and Diane Nolet. 2001. Handbook of Terminology. Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services.Google Scholar
Pilke, Nina. 2001. “Field-Specific Features of Dynamic Concepts – What, When and Why?” In Language for Special Purposes: Perspective for the New Millennium, I, ed. by Felix Mayer, 239–246. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Pozzi, María. 1999. “The Concept of ‘Concept’ in Terminology: A Need for a New Approach.” In TKE’99 Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Proceedings, ed. by Peter Sandrini, Fifth International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering , Vienna: TermNet.Google Scholar
Puuronen, Nina. 1995. “On Describing Dynamic Concepts – A Philosophical and Terminological Approach.” In ITTF Proceedings of the 10th European LSP Symposium, II , ed. by Gerhard Budin, 1093–1102. Vienna, TermNet.
Raizada, Rajeev D.S., Todd L. Richards, Andrew Meltzoff, and Patricia K. Kuhl. 2008. “Socioeconomic Status Predicts Hemispheric Specialisation of the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Young Children.” Neuroimage 40 (3): 1392–1401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds Losin, Elizabeth, Miraella Dapretto, and Marco Iacoboni. 2010. “Culture and Neuroscience: Additive or Synergistic.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5 (2-3): 148–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Margaret. 2004. “Multidimensionality in Concepts Systems.” Terminology 10 (2): 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of Categorization.” In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by Eleanor Rosch, and Barbara B. Lloyd, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Simmons, W. Kyle, Alex Martin, and Lawrence W. Barsalou. 2005. “Pictures of Appetizing Foods Activate Gustatory Cortices for Taste and Reward.” Cerebral Cortex 15: 1602–1608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Barry, and David Mark. 1998. “Ontology and Geographic Kinds.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling (SDH’98), ed. by Thomas K. Poiker, and Nick Chrisman, 308–320. Vancouver: International Geographical Union.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Ontology with Human Subjects Testing: an Empirical Investigation of Geographic Categories.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 582: 245–272.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Geographic Categories: An Ontological Investigation.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15 (7): 591–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (3): 411–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, Ramesh, Alberto Pepe, and Marko A. Rodriguez. 2009. “A Clustering-based Semi-automated Technique to Build Cultural Ontologies.” Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 60 (3): 608–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Sociocultural Situatedness of Terminology in the Life Sciences: The History of Splicing.” In Language and Mind II. Interrelations between Biology, Linguistics and Culture, ed. by Roslyn Frank, René Dirven, Jordan Zlatev, and Tom Ziemke, 327–360. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Tucker Mike, and Rob Ellis. 1998. “On the Relations between Seen Objects and Components of Potential Actions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24: 830–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The Potentiation of Grasp Types during Visual Object Categorization.” Visual Cognition 8: 769–800. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Sue Ellen. 2003. “From the Semiotic Triangle to the Semantic Web.” Journal of the International Institute for Terminology Research 14: 111–135.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Li, Biwei
2023. Conceptual deviation in terminology translation. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29:2 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Vintar, Špela & Matej Martinc
2022. Framing karstology. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 28:1 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Mi, Tian & Rodrigo Muñoz Cabrera
2020. ¿Numerales que atraviesan la barrera lingüística? Un estudio práctico de la traducción del 9 del chino al español por medio del Corpus CCEVAO. Estudios de Traducción 10 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Dahm, Maria R.
2018. A socio-cognitive investigation of English medical terminology: dynamic varieties of meaning. Lexicography 4:1 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
DÍAZ FLORES, Ismarie
2018. La terminología de la gastronomía puertorriqueña: reflexiones en torno a su trasfondo y representación. CLINA: Revista Interdisciplinaria de Traducción, Interpretación y Comunicación Intercultural 4:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Joan Casademont, Anna
2018. Variation dénominative avec conséquences cognitives : quelques exemples détectés autour de « musée ». Meta 63:2 ► pp. 444 ff. DOI logo
Faber, Pamela & M. Carmen África Vidal Claramonte
2017. Food terminology as a system of cultural communication. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 23:1 ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Freixa, Judit & Sabela Fernández-Silva
2017. Chapter 7. Terminological variation and the unsaturability of concepts. In Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 18], ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology [Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice, 23], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.