Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation Practice in the Field: Current research on socio-cognitive processes
Edited by Hanna Risku, Regina Rogl and Jelena Milosevic
[Translation Spaces 6:1] 2017
► pp. 62–78

Experiencing the interpreter’s role

Emotions of involvement and detachment in simultaneous church interpreting

| University of Tampere
This paper proposes an affective approach to examining the interpreter’s role. More specifically, it suggests that, by considering the interpreters’ subjective feelings of involvement and detachment related to an interpreted event, we can examine the ways in which their role is constructed, within and through a combination of personal, social, and material factors related to the setting and the interpreter’s working conditions. As an example, I take the case of simultaneous interpreting in two religious settings, which I have studied with autoethnography. Thus, I analyze my experiences of interpreting in two religious settings and contrast these experiences to an “ideal” model of the interpreter’s role in such settings: that of the fully involved participant. The analysis indicates that, while an internalized ideal model of role may provide a point of reference for reflection, the actual experience of role emerges in a complicated interaction between personal, social, and material aspects.
Keywords: affect, interpreter involvement, detachment, interpreter’s role, church interpreting, simultaneous interpreting, autoethnography
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Interpreter’s role from an affective perspective
  • 3.Method and research material
  • 4.Social settings: Simultaneous interpreting in two religious contexts
  • 5.The affectivity of involvement and detachment in simultaneous church interpreting
    • 5.1Involvement (and detachment) when interpreting in the PCS
    • 5.2(Involvement and) detachment when interpreting at the FLC summer conference
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.6.1.04hok
References (43)
References
Angelelli, Claudia. 2004a. Medical Interpreting and Cross-Cultural Communication. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Ethnographic Methods.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited by F. Pöchhacker, 148–150. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Balcı Tison, Alev. 2016. The Interpreter’s Involvement in a Translated Institution: A Case Study of Sermon Interpreting. Doctoral dissertation, Rovira i Virigili University, Spain.Google Scholar
Barbalet, Jack. 2002. “Introduction: Why Emotions Are Crucial.” In Emotions and Sociology, edited by J. Barbalet, 1–9. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The Bilingual Courtroom. Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bot, Hanneke. 2005. Dialogue Interpreting in Mental Health. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bowie, Fiona. 2003. “An Anthropology of Religious Experience: Spirituality, Gender and Cultural Transmission in the Focolare Movement.” ETHNOS 68 (1): 49–72. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Bruner, Edward M. 1986. “Introduction. Experience and its Expressions.” In The Anthropology of Experience, edited by Victor W. Turner and Edward M. Bruner, 3–30. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Camayd-Freixas, Erik. 2013. “Court Interpreter Ethics and the Role of Professional Organizations.” In Interpreting in a Changing Landscape, edited by C. Schäffner, K. Kredens, and Y. Fowler, 15–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Heewon. 2008. Autoethnography as Method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Jules. 2013. “One Job Too Many? The Challenges Facing the Workplace Interpreter.” In Interpreting in a Changing Landscape, edited by C. Schäffner, K. Kredens, and Y. Fowler, 133–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Agency in Conference Interpreting: Still a Myth?” Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 191: 27–36. Accessed February 17, 2017. [URL].
Downie, Jonathan. 2014. “Towards a Homiletic of Sermon Interpreting.” Journal of the Evangelical Homiletics Society 14 (2): 62–69.Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2000. “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, second edition, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 733–768. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furmanek, Olgierda. 2006. “The Role of Emotions in Establishing Meaning: Implications for Interpreting.” Journal of Specialized Translation 51: 57–71. Accessed February 17, 2017. [URL].
Grbić, Nadja. 2010. “‘Boundary Work’ as a Concept for Studying Professionalization Processes in the Interpreting Field.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 5 (1): 109–123. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra, and Jemina Napier. 2013. Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Herz, Rosanna. 1997. Reflexivity and Voice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, Sari. 2012. “Simultaneous Church Interpreting as Service.” The Translator 18 (2): 291–309. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016. To Serve and to Experience: An Autoethnographic Study of Simultaneous Church Interpreting. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tampere. Accessed October 11, 2016. [URL].
Hokkanen, Sari, and Kaisa Koskinen. 2016. “Affect as a Hinge: The Translator’s Experiencing Self as a Sociocognitive Interface.” Translation Spaces 5 (1): 78–96. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ellis. 2010. “Confessions of Belonging: My Emotional Journey as a Medical Translator.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 783–791. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Karlik, Jill. 2010. “Interpreter-Mediated Scriptures: Expectation and Performance.” Interpreting 12 (2): 160–185. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Francine. 2005. “Contribution à l’histoire de l’interprétation consecutive: le metourgemane dans les synagogues de l’Antiquité.” Meta 50 (3): 972–986. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti. 2001. “Church as Charismatic Fellowship: Ecclesiological Reflections from the Pentecostal-Roman Catholic Dialogue.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 181: 100–121. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lutz, Catherine, and Geoffrey M. White. 1986. “The Anthropology of Emotions.” Annual Review of Anthropology 151: 405–436. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Muñoz Martín, Ricardo. 2010. “On Paradigms and Cognitive Translatology.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by G. M. Shreve and E. Angelone, 169–187. Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napier, Jemina. 2011. “If a Tree Falls in the Forest, Does It Make a Noise? The Merits of Publishing Interpreting Research.” In Advances in Interpreting Research: Inquiry in Action, edited by B. Nichodemus and L. Swabey, 121–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Timothy J. 2005. Every Time I Feel the Spirit: Religious Experience, Ritual, and Emotion in an African American Church. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ortiz Soriano, Adela. 2015. “Impartiality in Police Interpreting.” English translation of the author’s article “La imparcialidad en la interpretación policial.” MonTI 71: s.p.. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Parrott, W. Gerrod, and Rom Harré. 1996. “Overview.” In The Emotions: Social, Cultural and Biological Dimensions, edited by R. Harré and W. G. Parrott, 1–20. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, Donald. 1988. Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. 1984. “Toward an Anthropology of Self and Feeling.” In Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, edited by R. A. Shweder and R. A. LeVine, 135–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Cynthia B. 2000. Interpreting as a Discourse Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Charles Y Glock. 1968. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Sarah J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight ‘Big-Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–885. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, Cécile B. 2010. “Double-Mouthed Discourse: Interpreting, Framing, and Participant Roles.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 14 (3): 341–369. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1998. Interpreting as Interaction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Phanthaphoommee, Narongdej & Sunida Siwapathomchai
2024. Understanding communicative relationships between caregivers and foreign retirees: a diffractive vignettes approach. Qualitative Research Journal 24:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Voinova, Tanya
2024. “Who are you standing with?”: cultural (self-re)translation of a Russian-speaking conference immigrant-interpreter in Israel during the war in Ukraine. Multilingua 43:1 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Xi, Ran
2024. Translating emotions: a netnography of affect in a conference interpreting case during COVID-19. Perspectives 32:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Adebayo, Rufus O. & Sylvia Phiwani Zulu
2023. Divergences and the sermonic replications in interpreters’ oral interpretation and communication among Pentecostal Churches. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) 12:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Downie, Jonathan
2023. A comparative interpreting studies view of interpreting in religious contexts. Translation and Interpreting Studies 18:3 ► pp. 448 ff. DOI logo
Downie, Jonathan
2024. A critical review of church interpreting research. Interpreting and Society 4:1 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Grbić, Nadja
2023. Who is an interpreter?. In Introducing New Hypertexts on Interpreting (Studies) [Benjamins Translation Library, 160], ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Ayan, Irem
2021. Re-thinking Neutrality Through Emotional Labour: The (In)visible Work of Conference Interpreters. TTR 33:2 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Mlundi, Simon
2021. Towards Professionalization of Church Interpretation in Tanzania: What Do Church Stakeholders Say about the Quality Criteria of Church Interpretation?. The Bible Translator 72:3 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.