Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 193–228

Mood selection in the complement of negation matrices in Spanish

 | Illinois State University
Following Lambrecht’s (1994, 2001) theory of Information Structure and drawing a conceptual parallel with Mejías-Bikandi’s (1994, 1998) account of mood distribution in Spanish complements, this study analyzes mood selection in the complement of negation and doubt matrices in Spanish in terms of the informational value of the proposition expressed in these complements. The main conclusion is that the use of the subjunctive mood in the complements of negation and doubt matrices is not motivated because these complements express a proposition known to be false, as it has been traditionally claimed in the literature, but rather because these complements express a proposition treated as present in the consciousness of both speaker and audience at the time of utterance. Keywords: Spanish; mood; subjunctive; complements
Published online: 5 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.07las
References (36)
References
Bell, Anthony. 1980. El modo en español: consideración de algunas propuestas recientes. Hispania 63: 377-390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[CCC 2002] Briz, Antonio (ed.). 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25-26. New York N: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1987. Cognitive constraints in information flow. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell Tomlin (ed.), 21-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[CORLEC 1992] Marín, Marcos F. (ed.). 1992. Corpus de Referencia de la Lengua Española Contemporánea CORLEC. Laboratorio de Lingüística Informática. [URL]Google Scholar
[COVJUEHA 1999] Azorín Fernández, Dolores & Jiménez Ruiz, Juan Luís (eds). 1999. Corpus Oral de la Variedad Juvenil Universitaria del Español Hablado en Alicante. Alicante: Instituto de Cultura “Juan Gil-Albert”.Google Scholar
Dahl, Osten. 1976. What is new information? In Approaches to Word Order [Reports in Text Linguistics 72], Nils Erik Enkvist & Vilgo Kohonen (eds), 37-50. Åbo: Åbo Akad. Forskninginstitut.Google Scholar
Danes, Frantisek. 1966. A three-level approach to syntax. In Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, Vol. I, Frantisek Danes et al. (eds), 225-240. Tuscaloosa AL: Alabama University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia M. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Guitart, Jorge M. 1991. The pragmatics of Spanish mood in complements of knowledge and acquisition of knowledge predicates. In Discourse Pragmatics and the Verb. The Evidence from Romance, Suzanne Fleischman & Linda R. Waugh (eds), 179- 193. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1975. On assertive predicates. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 4, John P. Kimball (ed.),91-124. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1986. Presupposition, theme and variations. In Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Anne M. Farley, Peter Farley & Katherine E. McCullough (eds), 168-192. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Laurie. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 167–193.Google Scholar
Klein, Flora. 1975. Pragmatic constraints on distribution: The Spanish subjunctive. In Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting , 353-365. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kruijff-Korbayová, Ivana & Steedman, Mark. 2003. Discourse and information structure. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12: 249-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463-516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavandera, Beatriz. 1983. Shifting moods in Spanish discourse. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.), 209-236. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophy and Logic 8: 339-359.Google Scholar
Lleó, Conxita. 1979. Some Optional Rules in Spanish Complementation: Towards a Study of the Speaker’s Intent. Tübingen: Tübingen University.Google Scholar
Lunn, Patricia. 1989. The Spanish subjunctive and relevance. In Studies in Roman Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 60], Carl Kirschner & Janet De Cesaris (eds), 250-260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mejías-Bikandi, Errapel. 1994. Assertion and speaker's intention: A pragmatically based account of mood in Spanish. Hispania 77: 529-539.Google Scholar
1998. Pragmatic presupposition and old-information in the explanation of the use of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Hispania 81: 941-947. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223-255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Discourse Description. Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295-325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spenader, Jennifer. 2003. Factive presuppositions, accommodation and information structure. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12: 351-368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic Presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton Munitz & Peter Unger (eds), 197-214. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Takagaki, Toshihiro. 1984. Subjunctive as a marker of subordination. Hispania 67: 248-256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terrell, Tracy & Hooper, Joan. 1974. A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish. Hispania 57: 484-494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terrell, Tracy. 1976. Assertion and Presupposition in Spanish Complements. In Current - Studies in Romance Linguistics, Marta Luján & Fritz Hensey (eds), 221-245. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Urmson, James Opie. 1963. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61: 480-496. In Philosophy and Language, Charles Caton (ed.), 220-240. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeevat, Henk. 1997. The common ground as a dialogue parameter. In Munich Workshop on Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Proceedings , Anton Benz & Gerhard Jager (eds), 195–214. Munich: Centrum fur Informations- und Sprachverarbeitung, Universität München, CIS-Bericht.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Simmul, Carl Eric
2024. Information structure of converb constructions: Estonian -des, -mata and -maks constructions. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.