Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences
Edited by Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten and Ana Vilacy Galucio
[Typological Studies in Language 105] 2014
► pp. 341–372

The multiple coreference systems in the Ese Ejja subordinate clauses

| Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage UMR5596 CNRS – Université de Lyon (Université Lumière Lyon 2) UC Berkeley
In Ese Ejja, an ergative Takanan language spoken in Peru and Bolivia, four subordinators with three allomorphs each mark referential congruence or incongruence vis-à-vis their matrix clause. While same-subject/different-subject systems in subordinate clauses are well attested crosslinguistically, this language also makes further, less usual, distinctions. On the one hand, it displays two distinct tripartite systems rather than a (mere) binary one. On the other hand, these systems display alignment features that differ from the straightforward ergative alignment found in main clauses. Interestingly, highly elaborated switch reference systems including a similar subject-object coreferentiality have been reported for a number of Panoan languages with which the five Takanan languages are claimed to be related. Keywords: Ese Ejja; switch-reference; argument alignment; grammaticalization; subordination
Published online: 5 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.12vui
References (42)
References
Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Muysken, Pieter C. 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999a. The Arawak language family. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 65-106.
1999b. Areal diffusion and language contact in the Içana-Vaupés basin north-west Amazonia. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 384-416.
2012. Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1981. Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57(2): 309-334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter (ed.). 1988. Complex Sentence Constructions in Australian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Janet. 1999. Tucano. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 207-226.
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. Paris: Hermès - Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. Introduction. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 1-22.
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds). The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logo
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fischer, Rafael & van Lier, Eva. 2011. Cofán subordinate clauses in a typology of subordination. In van Gijn, Haude & Muysken (eds), 221-249.
Fleck, David William. 2003. A Grammar of Matses. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2005. The participial construction of Dolakha Newar. Studies in Language 29(1): 35-87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik. 2006. A Grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina & Muysken, Pieter. 2011. Subordination in South America: An overview. In van Gijn, Haude & Muysken (eds), 1-23.DOI logo
Van Gijn, Rik, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds). 2011. Subordination in Native South American Languages[Typological Studies in Language 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Girard, Victor. 1971. Proto-Tacanan Phonology. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction, II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2008. A Grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Subordinate clauses, switch-reference, and tail-head linkage in Cavineña narratives. In van Gijn, Haude & Muysken (eds), 109-139.
Haiman, John 1983. On some origins of switch-reference marking. In Haiman & Munro (eds), 105-128.
Haiman, John & Munro, Pamela (eds.) 1983. Switch Reference and Universal Grammar[Typological Studies in Language 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1: 5-47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. 1967. Switch-reference in Hokan-Coahuiltecan. In Studies in South-Western Ethnolinguistics, Dell H. Hymes & William E. Bittle (eds), 238-263. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1983. On some origins of switch-reference marking. In Haiman & Munro (eds), 105-128.
Jendraschek, Gerd. 2009. Switch-reference constructions in Iatmul: Forms, functions and development. Lingua 119: 1316-1339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Key, Mary R. 1968. Comparative Tacanan Phonology: With Cavineña Phonology and Notes on Pano-Tacanan Relationships. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. 1911. The languages of the coast of California north of San Francisco. University of California Publications in Archaeology and Ethnology 9(3): 273-435.Google Scholar
Loos, Eugene E. 1999. Pano. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 227-250.
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela (ed.). 1980. Studies of switch-reference. UCLA Papers in Syntax, Vol. 8.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. 1976. Switch-reference in Maiduan: An areal and typological contribution. International Journal of American Linguistics 42(4): 297-304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1997. Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea. Papers in Papuan Linguistics 3: 101-241.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon. D. 1999. Tupí. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 107-124.
Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-Reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Longacre, Robert E. & Hwang, Shin Ja. 2007. Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Complex Constructions II, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 237-300. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A Grammar of Kwaza,Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine. 2009. Los verbos de postura Ese Ejja no se quedan inmóviles. Y a veces se desvían. In Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America IV , Austin, Texas . [URL]
2012. Grammaire de l'Ese Ejja, Langue Takana d’Amazonie Bolivienne. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 1999. Small language families and isolates in Peru. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds), 307-340.
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Matić, Dejan
2016. Ėven converbs and the syntax of switch-reference. In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Overall, Simon E.
2016. Switch-reference and case-marking in Aguaruna (Jivaroan) and beyond. In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
van Gijn, Rik
2016. Switch reference. In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
van Gijn, Rik
2016. Switch reference in Western South America. In Switch Reference 2.0 [Typological Studies in Language, 114], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Vuillermet, Marine
2014. Two types of incorporation in Ese Ejja (Takanan). In Word Formation in South American Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 163], ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Vuillermet, Marine
2021. Source-Goal asymmetries in Ese Ejja. Studies in Language 45:1 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.