Part of
Perspectives on Semantic Roles
Edited by Silvia Luraghi and Heiko Narrog
[Typological Studies in Language 106] 2014
► pp. 181204
References (23)
References
Bickel, Baltasar. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60–61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg. 1998. Le marquage de l’experient dans les langues de l’Europe. In Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–2], Jack Feuillet (ed.), 259–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2010. Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Exploring Inflectional Semantics in the Rigveda. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. ‘Aspects of the morphosyntax and semantics of the Early Vedic -tá participle and its prehistory’. In Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Selected papers from the workshop on Ergativity in Indo-Aryan at the SLE 43rd annual meeting [Typological Studies in Language], Eystein Dahl and Krzysztof Stroński (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dahl, Eystein & Fedriani, Chiara. 2012. The argument structure of experience: Experiential constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek and Early Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1888. Altindische Syntax. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Miriam. 2005. A frame-based approach to case alternations: The swarm-class verbs in Czech. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3): 475–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Scott. 2005. The Lattice of Case and Agentivity. MSc Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Haig, Geoffrey. 2009. Non-canonical subjects and alignment change – where’s the connection? Handout from the Workshop ‘Reconstructing Alignment Systems’ May 14–15, 2009.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans H. 1991. Oblique Subjects in Sanskrit? In Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages, Manindra K. Verma & Karuvannur Puthanveettil Mohanan (eds), 119–139. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Klein, Jared. 1985. Toward a Discourse Grammar of the Rigveda, Vol. 1: Coordinate Conjunctions, Part 1. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2012. The Vedic -ya-presents. Passives and Intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1991. Predicate classes and PARTICIPATION. In Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried Premper (eds), 183–239. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Primus Beatrice. 1999. Cases and Thematic Roles: Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael B. 1993. Cases as conceptual categories: Evidence from German. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processes in Language [Cognitive Linguistic Research 3], Richard A. Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 531–566. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In Advances in Role and Reference Grammar [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82], Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed), 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, E. 2007. Experiential Constructions in Yucatec Maya [Studies in Language Companion Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Carnesale, Lucrezia
2023. Experiential constructions in Hindi: the encoding of perceptions and bodily sensations. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 10:2  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2  pp. 567 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.