In functional-typological approaches to syntax the identification of semantic roles and the grammatical markers associated with them has been an important goal. In this paper it is argued that a similar approach to word formation patterns is possible and some criteria for the identification of the semantic roles in the domain of derivational morphology are provided. Agent, Instrument, and Location can be considered as different semantic roles in morphology, but polysemy between two or more of them is also frequent cross-linguistically. Deverbal suffixes employed in Ancient Greek for deriving instrumental and locative nouns are surveyed as a case study. The semantic analysis of the derivative nouns shows that those suffixes are also employed for building other nouns that are semantically related, but cannot be considered Instruments and Locations proper, such as non-prototypical instruments, prizes and rewards, and others. In general, when there is no specific suffix for a semantic role but a noun expressing it needs to be coined, suffixes for neighbouring semantic roles will be employed, depending on the available metaphor or metonymy that allows for the semantic extension. The comparison of these findings to the conceptual organization of grammatical morphemes in the same language (Greek) and in other languages in general reveals that both in syntax and morphology a similar semantic organization is found. However, the number of semantic roles that can be identified in syntax is higher than the number of semantic roles reflected in word formation patterns, so that semantic maps of word formation patterns are similar in shape but more reduced. Keywords: Semantic roles; word formation patterns; nominal morphology; derivation; Instrument; Location; Agent; Ancient Greek; semantic maps
2000What you can do with derivational morphology. In Morphology 2000. Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting (Vienna, 25–27 February 2000), Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolgang U. Dressler, Oskar Pfeiffer & Maria D. Voeikova (eds.), 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Booij, Geert
1986Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch agent nouns. Linguistics 24: 503–517.
Booij, Geert
2007The Grammar of Words, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.
Chantraine, Pierre
1933La formation des noms en grec ancien. Paris: Champion.
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra
1985Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 349–98. Cambridge: CUP.
Corbin, Danielle
1987Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Crespo, Emilio
1997Sintaxis de los elementos de relación en griego clásico. In Actas del IX Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, Vol. 2, Francisco R. Adrados & Alfonso Martínez Díez (eds), 3–42. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
Crespo, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Cruse, D. Alan
1973Some thoughts on agentivity, Journal of Linguistics 9: 11–23.
Cysouw, Michael
2007Building semantic maps: The case of person marking. In New Challenges in Typology, Bernhard Wälchli & Matti Miestamo (eds), 225–248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cysouw, Michael
2010Semantic maps as metrics of meaning. In Semantic Maps. Methods and Applications (Linguistic Discovery 8.1), Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 70–95.
Fillmore, Charles J
1968The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehard, and Winston.
2001Syntax: An Introduction, 2 Vols, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grossmann, Maria
1998Formazioni dei nomi di agente, strumento e lugo in italiano. In Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di linguistica e Filologia, Giovanni Rufino (ed.), 383–393. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Haspelmath, Martin
1997From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages. Munich: Lincom.
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meanings: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–242. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hernández, César
2005Los nombres de agente en micénico: Aspectos semánticos y morfológicos. MA thesis, Universidad Complutense (Madrid).
2010Semantic maps and word formation: Agents, Instruments, and related semantic roles. In Semantic Maps. Methods and Applications (Linguistic Discovery 8.1), Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov, 162–175.
Luraghi, Silvia
1995Protypicality and agenthood in Indo-European. In Historical Linguistics 1993. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Henning Andersen (ed.), 259–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2004The container schema in Homeric Greek. In Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva, Augusto Soares de Silva, Amadeu Torres & Miguel Gonçalves (eds), 25–41. Braga: Almedina.
Luschützky, Hans C. & Rainer, Franz
2011Agent noun polysemy in a cross-linguistic perspective. Language Typology and Universals 64(4): 287–338.
Luschützky, Hans C. & Rainer, Franz
2013Instrument and place nouns. A typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics 51(6) : 1301–1359.
Mel’čuk, Igor Aleksandrovič
1997Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive), Vol. 2 : Deuxième partie. Significations morphologiques. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Meyer-lübke, Wilhelm
1890Italienische Grammatik. Leipig: Reisland
Mugane, John M
1997A Paradigmatic Grammar of Gîkûyû. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Narrog, Heiko
2010A diachronic dimension in maps of case functions. In Semantic Maps: Methods and Applications (=lingusitics Discovery 8.1), Michael Cysouw, Martin Haspelmath & Andrej Malchukov (eds), 233–254.
Olsen, Derek & Doris L. Payne
2009Maa (Maasai) nominalization: animacy, agentivity and instrument. In Selected Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African linguistics: lingusitics theory and African Language Documentation, Masangu Matondo, Eric Potsdam & Fiona Mc laughlin (eds), 151–165. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Palancar, Enrique
2002The Origin of Agent Markers. Leipzig: Akademie Verlag.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Thornburg, Linda L
2001A conceptual analysis of English er nominals. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 2: Language Pedagogy, Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 149–200. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Plénat, Marc
2005Brèves remarques sur les déverbaux en -ette. In La syntaxe au coeur de la grammaire, Recueil offert en hommage au 60ème anniversaire de Claude Muller, Henning Nølke & Frederic Lambert (eds), 245–258. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
Pustejovsky, James
1995The Generative Lexikon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rainer, Franz
2005Semantic change in word formation. Linguistics 43(2): 415–441.
Rappaport, Malka & Levin, Beth
1992 -er Nominals: Implications for a theory of argument structure. In Syntax and Semantics 26: Syntax and the Lexicon, Tim Stowell & Eric Wehrli (eds), 127–153. New York NY: Academic Press.
Ryder, Mary Ellen
1991Mixers, mufflers, and mousers: the extending of the -er suffix as a case of prototype reanalysis. In Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Lingusitics Society, February 15–18, 1991: General session and parasession on the grammar of Event Structure, Laurel A. Sutton, Christophe Johnson & Ruth Shields (eds), 299–311. Berkeley: Berkeley Lingusitic Society.
Schlessinger, Izchak
1989Instruments as agents: on the nature of semantic relations. Journal of Linguistics 25: 189–210.
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J
1997Syntax, Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP.
Villoing, Florence & Namer, Fiammetta
2008Interpréter les noms déverbaux: Quelle relation avec la structure argumentale du verbe de base? Le cas des noms en -OIR du français. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française – CMLF’08, Jacques Durand, Bruno Habert & Bernard Laks (eds), 1551–1569. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. [URL] or
Wackernagel, Jacob
1922Vorlesungen über Syntax: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch. Basel: Emil Birkhäuser.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Ayora Estevan, Daniel
2023. Los alástores en la Grecia clásica: revisión y consideraciones sintáctico-semánticas. 'Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de las Religiones 28 ► pp. e81598 ff.
Piquero, Juan
2022. Mycenaean Adjectives in ‐te‐ri‐jo: A Reappraisal*. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Rissman, Lilia, Saskia van Putten & Asifa Majid
2022. Evidence for a Shared Instrument Prototype from English, Dutch, and German. Cognitive Science 46:5
TOYOTA, JUNICHI
2017. <i>Perspectives on Semantic Roles</i>. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 33:2 ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.