Temperature adjectives in Finnish
This paper provides a descriptive and theoretical account of Finnish temperature adjectives as a system consisting of a three-term core and a supplementary set. The former are unrestricted with respect to a number of grammatical and semantic parameters proposed in cross-linguistic and typological studies, whereas the latter have restricted availability in temperature subdomains or express additional semantic distinctions. In metaphorical uses of the adjectives, the base of semantic extensions is argued to be the culturally grounded emotional charge of positive or negative evaluation that gives rise to thermal preferences of different kinds of emotions. Metaphorical extensions not only involve changes in the argument structure of a term, but also significant increase in the use of syntactic frames with abstract situational semantics.
References (44)
References
Aitchison, Joan. 2003. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergström, Annika. 2010. Temperatur i språk och tanke. En jämförande semantisk studie av svenska temperaturadjektiv [Meijerbergs arkiv för svensk ordforskning 37] (Temperature in language and thought. A comparative semantic study of Swedish temperature adjectives). PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Booij, Geert E. 2002. Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 14: 301-329. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam. 2003. The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 1-49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: still hacking away. In Complex Predicates: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 48-78. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Uralic languages. In Languages of the Soviet Union, Bernard Comrie (ed.), 92-141. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, Seana. 2006. Metaphor and conceptual blending. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 32-39. Oxford: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, David Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, David Alan. 1992. Antonymy revisited: Some thoughts on the relationship between words and concepts. In Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds), 289-306. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blends and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles & Turner, Mark. 2008. Rethinking metaphor. In Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), 53-66. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, Joseph E. 1997. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Haarala, Risto (ed.). 1990. Suomen kielen perussanakirja (Basic dictionary of Finnish)[Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 55]. Helsinki: Edita.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hakulinen, Auli, Vilkuna, Maria, Korhonen, Riitta, Koivisto, Vesa, Heinonen, Tarja-Riitta, & Alho, Irja (eds). 2004. Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huumo, Tuomas. 2005. Onko jäädä-verbin paikallissijamääritteen tulosijalla semanttista motivaatiota? (Can the local case of the verb jäädä be semantically motivated?). Virittäjä 4: 506–524.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huumo, Tuomas. 2007. Force dynamics, fictive dynamicity, and the Finnish verbs of ‘remaining’. Folia Linguistica 41(1-2): 73-98. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2007. Guidelines for collecting linguistic expressions for temperature concepts: Version 1. <[URL]>
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 2011. “It’s boiling hot!” On the structure of the linguistic temperature domain across languages. In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zur Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kognitiven und Historischen Semantik, Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch & Richard Waltereit (eds), 393-410. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 2006. "Some like it hot": On the semantics of temperature adjectives in Russian and Swedish. STUF (Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung) 59(2): 253-269. Special issue The Lexicon: Typological and Contrastive Perspectives, Giannoula Giannoulopoulou & Torsten Leuschner (eds).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor and Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 2002. Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1985. Markedness and antonymy. Journal of Linguistics 21: 397–429. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, Keith & Lehrer, Adrienne. 1982. Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 483-501. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leinonen, Marja. 2008. Depictive secondary predicates in Finnish. In Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond [Studia Slavica Oldenburgensia 16], Christoph Schroeder, Gerd Hentschel & Winfried Boeder (eds), 167-187. Oldenburg: BIS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nenonen, Marja. 2007. Prototypical idioms: Evidence from Finnish. SKY Journal of Linguistics 20: 309-330.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas. 1994. Idioms. Language 70(3): 491-538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plank, Frans. 2010. Temperature talk: The basics revisited. Paper presented at the
Workshop on Temperature in Language and Cognition
. Stockholm University, 19-20 March.
Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 1999. Xolodno – gorjačo (It's cold – it's hot). Naučno-texničeskaja informacija. Serija 2. 11: 23-30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. 2010. Kognitivnyj analiz predmetnyh imën: semantika i sočetaemost’ (Cognitive analysis of presentive nominals: Semantics and combinability). Moscow: Azbukovnik.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadeniemi, Matti (ed.). 1996. Nykysuomen sanakirja (Dictionary of contemporary Finnish), 1–6. Juva: Wsoy.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Carlota S. 2005. Event structure and morphosyntax in Navaho. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation. [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 10], Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 190-212. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, Michael. 1986. Educational Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sutrop, Urmas. 1998. Basic temperature terms and subjective temperature scale. Lexicology 4: 60-104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sutrop, Urmas. 1999. Temperature terms in the Baltic Area. In Estonian: Typological Studies III [Publications of the Department of Estonian of the University of Tartu 11], Mati Erelt (ed.), 185-203. Tartu: University of Tartu.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swadesh, Morris. 1971. The Origin and Diversification of Language. Chicago IL: Aldine Atherton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143-160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viberg, Åke. 1993. Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progression In Progression and Regression in Language, Kenneth Hyltenstam & Åke Viberg (eds), 340-383. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2022.
Semantic maps and temperature: Capturing the lexicon-grammar interface across languages.
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41:1
► pp. 125 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Vanhove, Martine & Mohamed-Tahir Hamid Ahmed
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.