Cover not available
Part of
Valence Changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology
Edited by Natalie Operstein and Aaron Huey Sonnenschein
[Typological Studies in Language 110] 2015
► pp. 237–280

Chapter 12. Causative morphology in Macuiltianguis Zapotec

| University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
| University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
Kaufman (1994–2007) reconstructs three different protoZapotec causative morphemes: *(s)se, *o, and *k. Reflexes of all three are found in the modern Northern Zapotec language of Macuiltianguis Zapotec (MacZ). However, in MacZ they are not all valency increasing morphemes associated with causative semantics as evidenced by the fact that they cooccur on verbs marking only a single causative event. In this paper, we argue that in MacZ, only d(i), the reflex of *(s)se, bears causative semantics. The *o reflex is associated with agentive subjects, but not necessarily causativity, while *k’s association with causatives may have derived from protoZapotec *k(i), a potential aspect prefix.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.110.12for
References (31)
References
Bartholomew, Doris A. 1983. Gramática zapoteca. In Diccionario zapoteco de Juárez, Neil Nellis & Jane Goodner de Nellis (eds), 337‑444. México DF: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Kanerva, Jonni M. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1‑50.Google Scholar
Broadwell, George A. & Zhang, Jie. 1998. Macuiltianguis tone paradigms. Ms, SUNY Albany.
Broadwell, George A., Foreman, John & Bickmore, Lee S. 2009. Floating H tones and the tonology of Macuiltianguis Zapotec. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, San Francisco, CA, January 2009.
Campbell, Eric. 2012. The internal diversification and subgrouping of Chatino. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, Portland, OR, January 2012.
Carnie, Andrew. 2002. Syntax: A Generative Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto‑roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547‑619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, E. Bach & R.T. Harms (eds), 1‑88. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. & van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Foreman, John. 2006. The Morphosyntax of Subjects in Macuiltianguis Zapotec. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 2007. Do children still speak Macuiltianguis Zapotec? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas, Anaheim, CA, January 2007.
. 2012. “Locative” possessive constructions in Macuiltianguis Zapotec. In Expressing Location in Zapotec, Brook D. Lillehaugen & Aaron H. Sonnenschein (eds), 195‑220. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Foreman, John & Munro, Pamela. 2006. Reconstructing a typologically marked strategy for Zapotec relative clauses. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual High Desert Linguistic Society Conference, Susan Buescher, Keri Holley, Evan Ashworth, Clay Beckner & Christopher Shank (eds), 141‑153. Albuquerque NM: High Desert Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Foreman, John & Dooley, Sheila. 2012. Back and again in Zapotec. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest, Ft. Wayne, IN, October 2012.
García García, Angel, et al. n.d. [2012]. Oaxaca: Distritos (municipios, localidades, y habitantes). n.p. (Priv. de Rayon no. 104, Centro, Oaxaca, Oax).Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A Functional Typological Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2013. México en cifras. <[URL]>Google Scholar
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Infromática). 2002. Tabulados básicos por distrito y municipio Oaxaca: XII censo general de población y vivienda 2000. [CD‑ROM].Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 89‑150.Google Scholar
. 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369‑411.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1994‑2007. Proto‑Zapotec reconstructions. Ms, University of Pittsburgh.
Kulikov, Leonid. 1993. The ‘second causative’: A typological sketch. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 121‑154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D. (eds). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 18th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Nellis, Neil & Nellis, Jane Goodner de. 1983. Diccionario zapoteco de Juárez. México DF: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Operstein, Natalie. 2012. Typology and diachrony: On the origin of the Zapotec causative prefix *k‑ . Paper presented at the UCLA American Indian Seminar, January.
Smith‑Stark, Thomas C. 2007. Algunas isoglosas zapotecas. In Clasificación de las Lenguas Indígenas de México. Memorias del III Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Mauricio Swadesh, Cristina Buenrostro, Samuel Herrera Castro, Yolanda Lastra, Juan José Rendón, Otto Schumann, Leopoldo Valiñas & María Aydeé Vargas Monroy (eds), 69-133. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México & Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and Causation: A Universal‑Typological Perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G.
2023. The historical dialectology of stative morphology in Zapotecan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G.
2024. The tonal morphology of the potential in Coatec Zapotec (Di′zhke′). Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.