Cover not available
Part of
Valence Changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology
Edited by Natalie Operstein and Aaron Huey Sonnenschein
[Typological Studies in Language 110] 2015
► pp. 345–380

Chapter 16. Valence change

General and Zapotec perspectives

| University of Helsinki
Valence comprises the number of arguments a verb (maximally) takes. Valence is not an invariable notion, but the valence of verbs may be either increased (e.g. causative) or decreased (passive) by modifying the verbal morphology. In this chapter, an overview of the central valence changing operations will be given from both a general perspective and the perspective of Zapotec languages. First, both valence increase and decrease will be illustrated in light of numerous examples from different languages. This will be followed by an examination of the valence change in Zapotec languages. Special attention will be paid to those properties of Zapotec languages that can be seen as intriguing from a cross-linguistic perspective. These comprise, e.g. the high number of causatives, the lack of passive in most Zapotec languages, and the recursive marking of valence change.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.110.16kit
References (45)
References
Amberber, Mengistu. 2002. Verb Classes and Transitivity in Amharic. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter K. 1982. Transitivity and cognate objects in Australian languages. In Studies in Transitivity, Paul J. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 37-47. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary. 2004. A Coatlán-Loxicha Zapotec Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Bugenhagen, Robert D. 1995. A Grammar of Mangap-Mbula: An Austonesian Language of Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1983. The grammatical role of the causee in universal grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 49: 115-133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1973. The ergative: Variations on a theme. Lingua 32: 239-253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1975. Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 1974: 1-32.Google Scholar
Crowley, Terry. 1983. Uradhi. In The Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. III, R.M.W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 307-430. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Karen. 2003. A Grammar of the Hoava Language, Western Solomons. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Van de Kerke, Simon. 1998. Verb formation in Leko: causatives, reflexives and reciprocals. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 195‑203. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Helma. 1995. Hunzib. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A Grammar of Kwaza. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valence: Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30-83. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Introduction. In Changing Valence: Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1-29. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donohue, Mark. 1999a. Warembori. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 1999b. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubinsky, Stanley, Lloret, Maria-Rose & Newman, Paul. 1988. Lexical and syntactic causatives in Oromo. Language 64: 485–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1986. Pirahã. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. I, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 200-325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed), 282-364. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Foreman, John. 2006. The Morphosyntax of Subjects in Macuiltianguis Zapotec. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Haspelmath, Martin 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A. 1996. Transitivity in lexicon and grammar. Godoberi, Alexandr E. Kibrik (ed), 107–146. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2005. Remarks on involuntary agent constructions. Word 56: 377–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. A typology of tritransitives. Alignment types and motivations. Linguistics 45: 455–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Causative morphemes as non-valence increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43: 67-94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Causative morphemes as de-transitivizing mechanisms. What do non-canonical instances reveal about causation and causativization? Folia Linguistica 47: 113-138.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I. 1993. The “second causative”: a typological sketch. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 121–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyman Boulden, Hilario. 2007. Gramática popular del zapoteco de Comaltepec, Choapan, Oaxaca. México DF: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Maran, Raw La & Clifton, John M. 1976. The causative mechanism in Jinghpaw. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 443-458. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Donna Louise. 1976. Zapotec Verb Morphology: Categories and Tonomechanics with Special Attention to Sierra Juarez Zapotec. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed). 2007. Reciprocal Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V. & Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1988. Stative, resultative, passive and perfect in Evenki. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed), 241-257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions. A prototype analysis. Language 61: 821-848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant, Pardeshi. 2002. Causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85-126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy & Konaré, M. 1970. Sonrai causatives and passives: Transformational versus lexical derivations for propositional heads. Studies in African Linguistics 1: 211–254.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. 2008. Passive constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds), Ch. 107. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Smith Stark, Thomas C. 1999. Cambios de valencia en el zapoteco de Chichicapan. PDLMA handout.
. 2002. Las clases verbales del zapoteco de Chichicapan. Memorias del VI Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, Vol. 2, Zarina Estrada Fernández & Rosa María Ortiz Ciscomani (eds), 166-212. Hermosillo: University of Sonora.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and Causation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Speck, Charles H. 1978. The Phonology of Texmelucan Zapotec Verb Irregularity. MA thesis, University of North Dakota.
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1983. Kammu Phonology and Morphology. Lund: University of Lund.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G.
2023. The historical dialectology of stative morphology in Zapotecan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.