Cover not available
Part of
Switch Reference 2.0
Edited by Rik van Gijn and Jeremy Hammond
[Typological Studies in Language 114] 2016
► pp. 473–492

Target, embedding and switch-reference constructions in Kakataibo (Panoan, Peru)

ORCID logo | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Published online: 25 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.114.14zar
References (27)
References
Austin, Peter. 1981. Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57: 309–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Reference-tracking: Description and explanation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 51(1): 335–346.Google Scholar
Fleck, David W. 2003. A Grammar of Matses. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
. 2013. Pano Languages and Linguistics [Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 99]. New York NY: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2011. Subordinate clauses, switch-reference, and tail-head linkage in Cavineña narratives. In Subordination in Native South-American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katherina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 109–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, Rik. 2014. Repeated dependent clauses in Yurakaré. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language 105], Rik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Anna Vilacy Galucio (eds), 291–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina & Muysken, Pieter (eds). 2011. Subordination in Native South-American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John & Pamela Munro (eds). 1983. Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1995. The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. 2007. II censo de comunidades indígenas de la Amazonia. <[URL]>
Jacobsen, William H. 1967. Switch-reference in hokan-coahuiltecan. In Studies in Southwestern Ethnolinguistics, Dell Hymes & William E. Bittle (eds), 238–263. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 1983. Typological and genetic notes on switch-reference systems in North American Indian languages. In Haiman & Munro (eds), 151–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 181–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loos, E. (1999). Pano. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 227–250. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1997. Switch-reference in papua new guinea: A preliminary survey. In Papers in Papuan Linguistics, 3, [Pacific Linguistics Series A–87], Andrew Pawley (ed.). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Senft, Gunter (ed.). 2008. Serial Verb Constructions in Austronesian and Papuan Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Shell, Olive A. 1965. Pano Reconstruction. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. 1995. Converbs in turkish child language: The grammaticalization of event coherence. In Converbs in Crosslinguistic Perspective, Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds), 349–371. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sparing-Chávez, M. 1998. Interclausal reference in amahuaca. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 4, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 443–485. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley. 1993. Switch-reference and Discourse Representation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Switch-reference. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 12, Keith Brown (ed.), 316–323. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treis, Yvonne. 2012. Switch-reference and Omotic-Cushitic language contact in southwest Ethiopia. Journal of Language Contact 5: 80–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
. 2005. Participant-oriented adjuncts in Panoan. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives [Oxford Typology Series], Nikolaus P. Himmelman & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 259–298. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, David. 1996. Una gramática del quechua del Huallaga [Lingüística Peruana 40]. Lima: SIL.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011a. A Grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Relaciones gramaticales en cashibo-cacataibo. In Estudios sobre lenguas andinas y amazónicas. Homenaje a Rodolfo Cerrón-Palomino, Willem Adelaar, Pilar Valenzuela & Roberto Zariquiey (eds), 327–347. Lima: PUCP.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Olguín Martínez, Jesús
2023. Chapter 14. A typological study of tail-head linkage constructions. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 403 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.