Some references on nominalizations in Chantyal and other works referred to in the discussion

DeLancey, Scott
2005Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. Tibeto-Burman Linguistics: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian Linguistics in Honor of Prof. James A. Matisoff, 55–72. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1997Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. In Honor of T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The “double demonstratives” of Chantyal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(2): 173–188.Google Scholar
2003Chantyal. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Randy J. LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds), 315–335. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005Chantyal discourses. Himalayan Linguistics: Himalayan Linguistics Archive 2. With Ram Prasad Bhulanja. [URL]
2006Direct speech as a rhetorical style in Chantyal. Himalayan Linguistics, Himalayan Linguistics Journal 6. [URL]
2008aCase compounding in the Bodic languages. In Case and Grammatical Relations [Typological Studies in Language 81], Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds), 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bNominalizations in Bodic languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives for the Twenty-first Century [Typological Studies in Language 76], María José López-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), in collaboration with Teresa Fanego, 219–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008cContact-induced change in the Himalayas: The case of the Tamangic languages. In Language Contact and Contact Languages [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 7], Peter Siemund & Noemi Kintana (eds), 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Aspects of the historical development of nominalizers in the Tamangic languages. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 195–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael MS.
Crosslinguistic investigation of referential density. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, University of Cagliari, September, 2003. [URL] (21 April 2016).
Noonan, Michael, with Bhulanja, Ram Prasad, Chhantyal, Jag Man & Pagliuca, William
1999Chantyal Dictionary and Texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar