References
Agha, Asif. 1993. Structural Form and Utterance Context in Lhasa Tibetan. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences 30(4): 383–422.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alcázar, Asier & Saltarelli, Mario. 2014. The Syntax of Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baerman, Matthew & Brown, Dunstan. 2013. Syncretism in verbal person/number marking. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (21 April 2016).
Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50(3): 255–271. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bartee, Ellen Lynn. 2007. A Grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara. <[URL]> (20 April 2016).
Belyaev, Oleg. 2013. Optimal agreement at m-structure: Person in Dargwa. In Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds). <[URL]> (21 April 2016).
Bendix, Edward H. 1974. Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman contact as seen through Nepali and Newari verb tenses. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 3(1): 42–59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bendix, Edward H. 1992. The grammaticalization of responsibility and evidence: Interactional manipulation of evidential categories in Newari. In Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine (eds), 226–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2000. Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23: 1–37.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2001a. Die Kategorie der Person in den Sprachen der Welt. Handout of talk given at the University of Zurich, 11 May.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. Verb agreement and epistemic marking: A typological journey from the Himalayas to the Caucasus. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 2 Vols, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 1–14. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatial Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birchall, Joshua. 2014. Argument Marking Patterns in South American Languages. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics. <[URL]> (21 April 2016). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bond, Oliver. 2006. A broader perspective on point of view: Logophoricity in Ogonoid languages. In Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. African Languages and Linguistics in Broad Perspectives, John Mugane, John P. Hutchison & Dee A. Worman (eds). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press. <[URL]> (18 April 2016).
Brugman, Claudia M. & Macaulay, Monica. 2015. Characterizing evidentiality. Linguistic Typology 19(2): 201–237. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruil, Martine. 2015. When evidentials are not evidentials: The case of the Ecuadorian Siona reportative. Linguistic Typology 19(3): 385–423.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L., Pagliuca, William & Perkins, Revere D. 1990. On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In Studies in Typology and Diachrony: Papers Presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th Birthday [Typological Studies in Language 20], William A. Croft, Suzanne Kemmer & Keith Denning (eds),1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chun, Soon Ae & Zubin, David A. 1990. Experiential vs. agentive constructions in Korean narrative. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 16: 81–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clements, George N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10: 141–177.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clynes, Adrian. 1995. Topics in the Phonology and Morphosyntax of Balinese: Based on the Dialect of Singaraja, North Bali. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The canonical approach in typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creissels, Denis. 2008. Person variations in Akhvakh verb morphology: Functional motivation and origin of an uncommon pattern. STUF-Language Typology and Universals 61(4): 309–325. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creissels, Denis. 2009. Language documentation and verb inflection typology: The case of Northern Akhvakh (Nakh-Daghestanian). Paper presented at Chronos 9, Paris.
Creissels, Denis. 2010. Person deixis in Northern Akhvakh reported speech. Paper presented at Workshop on Reported Speech in East Caucasian Languages, Lyon, September 22.
Culy, Christopher. 1994. Aspects of logophoric marking. Linguistics 32(6): 1055–1094. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culy, Christopher. 1997. Logophoric pronouns and point of view. Linguistics 35(5): 845–860. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 1997. A Grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An Indigenous Language of South-western Colombia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2000. Why ‘first/non-first person’ is not grammaticalized mirativity. In Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan & John Henderson (eds). <[URL]>
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002a. Three types of verbal logophoricity in African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 31(1–2): 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002b. Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3): 611–627.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002c. Types of interaction between evidentials and first-person subjects. Anthropological Linguistics 44(2): 178–196.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cysouw, Michael. 2010. The expression of person and number: A typologist’s perspective. Morphology 21(2): 419–443.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen. 2008. Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua 118(2): 141–150.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Mark. 2011. Corpus of American Soap Operas: 100 million words. Available online at [URL].
DeLancey, Scott. Forthcoming. Evidentiality in Tibetic. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeLancey, Scott. 1990. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3): 289–322. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25: 39–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1): 33–52.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33(3): 369–382.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 529–564.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan [London Oriental and African Language Library 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Mathew. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and Basic Linguistic Theory. In Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, Felix K. Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. <
>
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds). 2013. WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (27 June 2016).
Egerod, Søren. 1974. Further notes on Akha sentence particles. Paper presented at the Sino-Tibetan Conference 7
, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Egerod, Søren & Hansson, Inga-Lill. 1976. Aspects of Akha grammar. Lampang Reports 5: 230–243. Copenhagen: Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas. 1997. Grammaticizing the knower: Towards a partial typology of person effects on predicates. Handout from plenary presentation at the Third Australian Linguistics Institute, ANU.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas. 2006. View with a view: Towards a typology of multiple perspective constructions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 31(1): 93–120. <[URL]> (1 August 2013).
Forker, Diana. In press. Evidentiality in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forker, Diana. nd. The semantics of evidentiality and epistemic modality in Avar.
Garrett, Edward John. 2001. Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gawne, Lauren. 2013. Lamjung Yolmo Copulas in Use: Evidentiality, Reported Speech and Questions. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne. <[URL]>
Gawne, Lauren & Hill, Nathan W. (eds). 2017. Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genetti, Carol. 1990. A Descriptive and Historical Account of the Dolakha Newari Dialect. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genetti, Carol, Applebaum, Ayla, Balodis, Bird, Christy, Rosenblum, Daisy, Suzuki, Ryoko & Walker, Alex. 2009. An Introduction to Dzala: An East-Bodish language of eastern Bhutan. Paper presented at the 15th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Eugene OR, July 31.
Giles, Glenda. nd.. A guide to the pronunciation of Duna and Duna language lessons.
Gossner, Jan D. 1994. Aspects of Edolo Grammar. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagège, Claude. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69(1): 287–310.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 7: 95–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Austin & Shrestha, Kedār P. 2006. Newār (Nepal Bhāsā). Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hale, Austin & Watters, David E. 1973. A survey of clause patterns. In Clause, Sentence, and Discourse Patterns in Selected Languages of Nepal, Part II, Austin Hale & David E. Watters (eds), 175–249. Kathmandu: SIL and Tribhuvan University Press. <[URL]>.
Hansson, Inga-Lill. 2003. Akha. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 236–252. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hargreaves, David. 1991. The conceptual structure of intentional action: Data from Kathmandu Newari. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17(1): 379–389.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hargreaves, David. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5: 1–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasegawa, Yoko & Hirose, Yukio. 2005. What the Japanese language tells us about the alleged Japanese relational self. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 219–251.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Häsler, Katrin. 2001. An empathy-based approach to the description of the verb system of the Dege dialect of Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1): 1–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A. & Gilligan, Gary. 1988. Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order. Lingua 74(2–3): 219–259. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heineman, Paul. 1998. A Grammar of Lembena. Arlington TX: SIL. <[URL]> (19 April 2016).
Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. ‘Mirativity’ does not exist: ḥdug in ‘Lhasa’ Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3): 389–433.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huber, Brigitte. 2005. The Tibetan Dialect of Lende (Kyirong): A Grammatical Description with Historical Annotations. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyman, Larry M. & Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3(1): 19–37. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irvine, Judith T. 1996. Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In Natural Histories of Discourse, Michael Silverstein & Greg Urban (eds). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillame. Under review. Evidentiality in Japhug.
Janhunen, Juha A. 2007. Typological interaction in the Qinghai linguistic complex. Studia Orientalia Electronica 101: 85–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knuchel, Dominique. 2015. A Comparative Study of Egophoric Marking: Investigating its Relation to Person and Epistemic Marking in Three Language Families. MA dissertation, University of Stockholm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William & Fanshel, David. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lang, Adrianne. 1973. Enga Dictionary with English Index. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(6): 643–686.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Christian. 2010. Speech-act participants in modality. <[URL]>
Loughnane, Robyn. 2005. Reported speech constructions in Golin. In Materials on Golin: Grammar, Texts and Dictionary, Nicholas Evans, Hywel Stoakes, Alan Lee & Jutta Besold (eds), 131–152. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loughnane, Robyn. 2009. A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne. <[URL]>
Lum, Jonathon. 2016. A conjunct-disjunct analysis of Dhivehi verbal morphology. Paper presented at The Symposium on Evidentiality, Egophoricity, and Engagement, University of Stockholm.
Magometov, Aleksandr A. 1982. Megebskij dijalekt darginskogo jazyka. Tblisi: Mecniereba.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCready, Eric. 2007. Context shifting in questions and elsewhere. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, Estella Puig-Wladmüller (ed.) 433–447. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Amy. 2001. A Grammar of Jamul Tipay. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mueller, Neele. 2013. Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality Marking in South American Indigenous Languages. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murray, Sarah E. 2010. Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University. <[URL]>
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2012. Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology 16: 233–263.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oisel, Guillaume. 2014. From motion verbs to evidentiality in Tibetan. Paper presented at the 24th Meeting of Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. <[URL]>
Oswalt, Robert L. 1986. The evidential system of Kashaya. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Encoding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 29–45. Norwood NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pitkin, Harvey. 1984. Wintu Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plank, Frans (ed.). 2007. Linguistic Typology 11(1). (Special Issue).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plungian, Vladimir. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anne. 1980. Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4): 186–198. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Regmi, Dan Raj. 2013. Khwopa Newar: A Grammar Sketch. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Ruiter, Jan P.(ed.) 2012. Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rule, W. Murray. 1977. A Comparative Study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole Languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumsey, Alan. Forthcoming. Egophoricity, engagement, and the centring of intersubjectivity.
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, Lila. 2008. An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth. 2017. Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua186–187: 120–143.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robyn. 2012a. The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Linguistic Typology 16(1): 111–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
San Roque, Lila & Loughnane, Robyn. 2012b. Inheritance, contact and change in the New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia: Special Issue 2012(Part II): 397–427.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandman, Erika & Simon, Camille. 2016. Tibetan as a ‘model language’ in the Amdo Sprachbund: Evidence from Salar and Wutun. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 3(1): 85–122.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schultze-Berndt, Eva & Faller, Martina. 2015. Inclusive pronouns as intersubjective evidentials: Shared access vs. primary access to knowledge. Paper presented at the Workshop Person and Knowledge: From Participant Role to Epistemic Marking, 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE 2015), Leiden.
Seyoum, Mulugeta. 2008. A Grammar of Dime. Utrecht: LOT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siemund, Peter. 2001. Interrogative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1010–1028. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slater, Keith W. 2003. A grammar of Mangghuer: A Mongolic Language of China’s Qinghai-Gansu Sprachbund. London: RoutledgeCurzon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speas, M. 2004. Evidential paradigms, world variables and person agreement features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16(1): 253–280.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strahm, Ester. 1975. Clause patterns in Jirel. Collected Papers on Sherpa Jirel [Nepal Studies in Linguistics 2]. Kirtipur: SIL & Institute of Nepal and Asian Studies. <[URL]> (21 April 2016).
Sumbatova, Nina. 2011. Person hierarchies and the problem of person marker origin in Dargwa: Facts and diachronic problems. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages [Diversitas Linguarum 30], Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 131–160. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson Tianshin. Forthcoming. Evidentials and person. In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sun, Jackson Tianshin. 1993. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 63(4): 945–1001.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurgood, Graham. 1981. The historical development of the Akha evidentials system. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 295–302.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurgood, Graham. 1986. The nature and origins of the Akha evidentials system. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 214–222. Norwood NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1992. La déixis en tibétain: Quelques faits remarquables. In La Deixis: Colloque en Sorbonne, 8–9 juin 1990, Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds), 197–208. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1994. Personne et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de langues 2(3): 149–158.
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996. Comparaison des systèmes médiatifs de quatre dialectes Tibétains: Tibétain Central, Ladakhi, Dzongkha et Amdo. Louvain: Peeters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2005. L’aire linguistique tibétaine et ses divers dialectes. Lalies 25: 7–56.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vokurková, Zuzana. 2008. Epistemic modalities in spoken Standard Tibetan. Ms, Charles University, Prague, and University of Paris 8.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watters, David. 2006. The conjunct-disjunct distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics 22: 300–319.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weber, Tobias. 2011. Conjunct/disjunct marking: Diachrony, origins, areality. Paper presented at the Workshop on Conjunct/Disjunct Alignment, Linguistic Society of America Summer Institute, Boulder CO.
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. What “you” and “I” mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2): 332–365. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widmer, Manuel. 2013. Semi-direct speech as a source of assertor’s involvement marking. Paper presented at the 19th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Australian National University.
Widmer, Manuel. 2014. A Descriptive Grammar of Bunan. PhD dissertation, University of Bern.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widmer, Manuel. 2015a. Towards a diachronic typology of egophoricity. Paper presented at the Transalpine Typology Meeting, Lyon.
Widmer, Manuel. 2015b. The transformation of verb agreement into epistemic marking: Evidence from Tibeto-Burman. In Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective, Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodbury, Anthony C. 1986. Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 188–202. Norwood NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yliniemi, Juha. 2017. Copulas in Denjongke or Sikkimese Bhutia. In Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds), 297-349. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeisler, Bettina. 2004. Relative Tense and Aspectual Values in Tibetan Languages: A Comparative Study. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeisler, Bettina. 2012. Evidentiality and inferentiality: Overlapping and contradictory functions of the so-called evidential markers in Ladakhi (West Tibetan). Paper presented at The Nature of Evidentiality Conference, Leiden.