Part of
Edited by Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe and Lila San Roque
[Typological Studies in Language 118] 2018
► pp. 109137
Aris, Michael
1979Bhutan, the Early History of a Himalayan Kingdom. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar
Aronson, Howard
1967The grammatical categories of the indicative in the contemporary Bulgarian literary language. In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, 11 October 1966, 82–98. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena
2010Traces of mirativity in Shina. Himalayan Linguistics 9(2): 1–55.Google Scholar
Bosch, Andre
2016Language contact in Upper Mangdep: A comparative grammar of verbal constructions. Sydney: University of Sydney Honours thesis.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2000Why “first/non-first person” is not grammaticalized mirativity. In Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan & John Henderson (eds). [URL]
DeLancey, Scott
1990Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics 1(3): 289–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensa 25: 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Kurtöp and Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 29–38. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
2012Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16: 529–564.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connie
2000Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(2): 379–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George
1998Dzongkha [Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region 1]. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor
1977The Grammatical Categories of the Mecedonian Indicative. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
1986Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 168–187. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren & Hill, Nathan
(eds) 2017Evidential Systems in Tibetic Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol
2009An introduction to Dzala, an East Bodish language of Bhutan. Presented at the 15th Himalayan Languages Symposium, August 1, Eugene OR.Google Scholar
Grunow-Harsta, Karen
2007Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 30(2): 151–194.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A, 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan
2012‘Mirativity’ does not exist: ‘Lhasa’ ḥdug and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16: 289–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2008Kurtöp and the classification of the languages of Bhutan. In Proceedings from the 44th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 141–152. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2009Kurtöp tone: A tonogenetic case study. Lingua 119: 827–845. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2011Mirativity in Kurtöp. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 4(1): 43–60.Google Scholar
2017A Grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn & Tshering, Karma
2017. An overview of some epistemic categories in Dzongkha. In Evidential Systems of Tibetan Languages, Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill eds 331 365 Berlin De Gruyter Mouton
Michailovsky, Boyd & Mazaudon, Martine
1994Preliminary notes on languages of the Bumthang groups. In Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 6th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Vol. 2, 545–557. Fagernes: The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2013Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103], Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds), 107–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Robert
1954The linguistic position of Dwags. Oriens, Zeitschrift Der Internationalen Gesellschraft Für Orientforschung 7: 348–356.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1993Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academica Sinica 63(4): 945–1001.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008Against the concept of ‘Conjunct’/’Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy J.
2014Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 240–63. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Watters, David
2002A Grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2023. Speaking about knowledge. Studies in Language DOI logo
Grollmann, Selin
2020. Diachronic aspects of Bjokapakha epistemic verbal morphology. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 43:1  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Grzech, Karolina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Henrik Bergqvist
2020. Knowing in interaction: An introduction. Folia Linguistica 54:2  pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Hyslop, Gwendolyn
2020. Grammaticalized sources of Kurtöp verbal morphology. Studies in Language 44:1  pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.