Part of
Edited by Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe and Lila San Roque
[Typological Studies in Language 118] 2018
► pp. 305345
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anand, Pranav & Nevins, Andrew
2004Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Kazuha Watanabe & Robert B. Young (eds), 20–37. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Beuchat, Henri, & Rivet, Paul
(1910) Affinités des langues du sud de la Colombie et du nord de l’Équateur. Le Mouséon, 11, 33–68, 141–198.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2000Introduction: Person and evidence in Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2): 1–11.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna
2007Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2nd (ed.), Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
(1997) American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Soon Ae, & Zubin, David A.
1990Experiential vs. agentive constructions in Korean narrative. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Kira Hall, Jean Pierre Koenig, Michael Meacham, Sondra Reinman & Laurel Sutton (eds), 81–93. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Constenla Umanã, Adolfo
1991Las lenguas del área intermedia: Introducción a su estudio areal. San José: Universidad de Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Remarks on so-called ‘conjunct/disjunct’ systems. Paper presented at the conference Syntax of the World’s Languages III, Berlin.
Curnow, Timothy J.
1997A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of Southwestern Colombia. Phd dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2000Why “first/non-first person” is not grammaticalized mirativity. In Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan & John Henderson (eds). [URL]
2002Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics 40(3): 611–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2003The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking [Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand
2001The place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American Linguistics 67: 193–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1992The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25: 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Connie
2000Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24(3): 379–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Grammaticalizing the knower in Tsafiki. Handout from the Workshop on The Grammar of Knowledge Asymmetries: ‘Conjunct/disjunct’ Alignment from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Linguistics Society of America [LSA] Institute, Boulder CO.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert. M.W.
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2009Grammar and psychosocial cognition. Course handout, LSA Institute 2009, Berkeley CA.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T.
2002Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University CA.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der
1901Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Garrett, Edward J.
2001Evidentiality and Assertion in Tibetan. PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2009Feature economy in the linguistic cycle. In Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory, Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds), 93–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzales Castaño, Geny
2014Esquisse de description de la langue nam trik. Langue amerindienne parlée dans les Andes Colombiennes. Unpublished Masters thesis. Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H
1960General classification of Central and South American languages. In Men and Cultures: Fifth international congress of anthropological and ethnological sciences (1956), Anthony F. C. Wallace (ed.), 791–794. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1987Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Austin
1980Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 [Pacific Linguistics Series A, 53], Ronald L. Trail (ed.), 95–106. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J.
1986Data-source marking in the Jaqi languages. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 113–136. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David
1991The conceptual structure of intentional action: Data from Kathmandu Newari. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 379–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5, 1–48.Google Scholar
Hodge, Carleton
1970The linguistic cycle. Language Sciences 13: 1–7.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and other Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence
1990Language history in South America: What we know and how to know more. In Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, Doris L. Payne (ed.), 13–67. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1994The native languages of South America. In Atlas of the world’s languages, Christopher Mosley & R. E. Asher (eds), 46–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, Stephen S.
2003Santa. In The Mongolic Languages, Juha Janhunen (ed.), 346–363. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
2005Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loughnane, Robyn
2009A Grammar of Oksapmin. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Malone, Terry
1988The origin and development of Tuyuca evidentials. International Journal of American Linguistics 54: 119–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2003Evidentiality in Yukaghir. In Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 219–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa
SubmittedEvidence type, evidence location, evidence strength.Google Scholar
Miller, Amy
2001A Grammar of Jamul Tiipay [Mouton Grammar Library 23]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1999The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E.
2010Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana
2001Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2012Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology 16: 233–263.Google Scholar
Nugteren, Hans
2003Shira Yughur. In The Mongolic Languages, Juha Janhunen (ed.), 265–285. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L.
1986The evidential system of Kashaya. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 29–45. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pabón, Marta
1989Introducción al estudio de los auxiliares – idioma totoró. Unpublished Masters thesis. Santafé de Bogotá: CCELA.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir A.
2001The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark
2013Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo: Historical origins and functional motivation. In Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103], Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds), 105–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren D.
1986Some remarks on direct and indirect speech in Slave (Northern Atapaskan). In Direct and Indirect Speech, Florian Coulmas (ed.), 47–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojas Curieux, Tulio, Roció Nieves Oviedo, y Marcos Yule Yatacue
1991Estudios Grammaticales de la Lengua Páez (Nasa Yuwe). Descripciones 7. Colciencias: Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá.Google Scholar
Rule, W. Murray
1977A Comparative Study of the Foe, Huli, and Pole languages of Papua New Guinea. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila
2008An Introduction to Duna Grammar. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon & Norcliffe, Elisabeth
2017Evidentiality and interrogativity. Lingua 186–187: 120–143. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
2003A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 29–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seyoum, Mulugeta
2008A Grammar of Dime. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Sydney
1968Self-reference and self-awareness. The Journal of Philosophy 65(19): 555–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970Persons and their pasts. American Philosophical Quarterly 7(4): 269–285.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D.
2017Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Twentieth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy
2000Person and point of view in Navajo. In WCCFL Papers in Honor of Ken Hale, Eloise Jelinek (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
2008Against the concept of ‘Conjunct’/’Disjunct’ in Tibetan. In Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Paul Widmer & Peter Schwieger (eds), 281–308. Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Triviño Garzón, Lilia
1991Sobre la modalidad en la lengua guambiana (Quizgó). In Memorias II. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
1994aAlgunas particularidades de los verbs de posición en la lengua guambiana (Quizgó). Amerindia 29–30: 195–206.Google Scholar
1994bHacia una tipología de la predicacíon de la oración simple en la lengua guambiana. BIFEA 23(3): 601–618.Google Scholar
Vásquez de Ruíz, Beatriz
1988La predicación en guambiano [Lenguas Aborígenes de Colombia. Série Descripciones 2]. Santafé de Bogotá: CCELA.Google Scholar
1994La oración compuesta en guambiano. BIFEA 23(3): 619–637.Google Scholar
2007Les opérations de modélisation épistémique en guambiano (Cauca, Colombie). In L’Énonciation médiatiseé II, Zlatka Guentchéva & Jon Landaburu (eds), 87–110. Louvain: Éditions Peeters.Google Scholar
Waldie, Ryan James
2012Evidentiality in Nuu-chah-nulth. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Watters, David E.
2006The conjunct-disjunct distinction in Kaike. Nepalese Linguistics 22: 300–319.Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2014A Descriptive Grammar of Bunan. PhD dissertation, University of Bern.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1958Philosophical Investigations. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Anthony C.
1986Interaction of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology [Advances in Discourse Processes 20], Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 188–202. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Pancheva, Roumyana & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta
2019. On the role of person features in the evidential-temporal connection. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:4  pp. 673 ff. DOI logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
Sandman, Erika & Karolina Grzech
2022. Egophoricity and evidentiality: Different categories, similar discourse functions. Interactional Linguistics 2:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.