Cover not available
Part of
Uralic Essive and the Expression of Impermanent State
Edited by Casper de Groot
[Typological Studies in Language 119] 2017
► pp. 325–351

Chapter 14
The essives in Hungarian

This chapter presents an empirical study of the distribution of the three essive markers in Hungarian on the basis of a linguistic questionnaire that captures the contexts in which essive and translative markers may occur in the Uralic languages. The study specifically investigates the opposition between permanent and impermanent state in non-verbal predications. The linguistic domains involved are non-verbal main predication, secondary predication, complementation, and manner, temporal, and circumstantial adverbial phrases. The use of the essives (associated with state) is contrasted with the use of the translative (associated with change). Finally, the syntactic position of elements marked by an essive is discussed in relation to the position of focus constituents.
Keywords: Hungarian, depictive, essive case, impermanent state, non-verbal predication, focus
Article outline
  • 0.Preliminary
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Hungarian and the Hungarians
    • 1.2The case inventory of Hungarian
    • 1.3Hungarian productive essive forms
    • 1.4Less productive and non-productive forms
  • 2.Non-verbal predication
  • 3.Secondary predication
    • 3.1Depictive
      • 3.1.1General properties of depictives with an essive in Hungarian
      • 3.1.2-ként
      • 3.1.3-ul/-ül
      • 3.1.4-n/-an/-en
      • 3.1.5Other (markers of) depictives
    • 3.2Resultative
  • 4.Predicative complements
  • 5.Manner adverbials
  • 6.Temporality, circumstance, and location
    • 6.1Temporal expressions
    • 6.2Circumstantial expressions
    • 6.3Locational expressions
  • 7.Comparative and simile expressions
  • 8.Essive versus translative
  • 9.Word order
  • 10.Conclusions and final remarks
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 30 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.119.14deg
References (18)
Sources
The Hungarian Gigaword Corpus: <[URL]>
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 1992. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
de Groot, Casper. 2008. Depictive secondary predication in Hungarian. In Schroeder et al. (eds), 69–96.Google Scholar
. 2009. Identifiability and verbal cross-referencing markers in Hungarian. In Interpersonal Grammar: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, Evelien Keizer & Miriam van Staden (eds). Special issue of Linguistics 47(4): 997–1019.Google Scholar
. 2012. Oriented adjuncts and representational frames: Depictives and manner in Hungarian. In Between East and West. Festschrift for Wim Honselaar [POES 20], René Genis, Eric de Haard, Janneke Kalsbeek, Evelien Keizer & Jenny Stelleman (eds), 217–239. Amsterdam: Pegasus.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenyvesi, Anna (ed.). 2005. Hungarian Language Contact Outside Hungary [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 20]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gyurgyík, László & Sebők, László. 2003. Népszámlálási körkép Közép-Európából 1989–2002 (An overview of Central European censuses, 1989–2002). Budapest: Teleki László Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva F. Schultze-Berndt (eds), 1–67. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert M. & Fenyvesi, Anna. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc (ed.). 2000. Strukturális magyar nyelvtan, 3. Kötet: Morfológia (A structural grammar of Hungarian, Part 3: Morphology). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kiss, Jenő & Pusztai, Ferenc. 2005. Magyar nyelvtörténet (A history of the Hungarian language). Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2013. The family of secondary predications in English: An FDG view. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 67: 43–58.Google Scholar
Nose, Masahiko. 2003. Word order positions of the Finno-Ugric essive case forms. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 2: 103–114. Google Scholar
Oravecz, Csaba, Váradi, Tamás & Sass, Bálint. 2014. The Hungarian gigaword corpus. In Proceedings of LREC 2014, 1719–1723.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva F. & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Depictive secondary predicates. Linguistic Typology 8(1): 59–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tompa, Jozsef (1968), Ungarische Grammatik. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

den Dikken, Marcel & Éva Dékány
2023. The morphosyntax of the Hungarian sociative and dissociative suffixes. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Schvarcz, Brigitta R.
2022.  Hárman, sokan, mindannyian . Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.