Cover not available
Part of
Verb Valency Changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives
Edited by Albert Álvarez González and Ia Navarro
[Typological Studies in Language 120] 2017
► pp. 134–164

Valency-changing operations in Yaqui resultatives

| Universidad de Sonora
This paper describes the resultative constructions existing in Yaqui (Uto-Aztecan) and discusses the valency issues involved in these constructions. The study shows that Yaqui has five different syntactic types of resultatives: S-, A- and bivalent S-resultatives marked by the suffix -(l)a, and P- and R-resultatives marked by the suffix -(r)i. The analysis of the different valency-changing operations present in these constructions demonstrates that the -(l)a resultativization does not trigger a valency change, contrary to the -(r)i resultativization that always implies a valency decreasing operation. More specifically, it is shown that P-resultatives and personal passives exhibit a functional overlap, that R-resultatives are derived from an applicative construction, and that the bivalent S-resultative is in fact an externally possessed S-resultative that can be considered an external possession construction if the base verb is a non-derived intransitive verb root and if the possessive relation is an inanimate inalienable possession. As for the suffix -la used in A-resultatives, some evidences indicate that it is in the process of being grammaticalized as a perfect/anterior marker in Yaqui.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Yaqui language
  • 3.Resultative constructions
  • 4.Resultative constructions in Yaqui
    • 4.1Monovalent resultatives in Yaqui
      • 4.1.1S-resultative in Yaqui
      • 4.1.2P-resultative in Yaqui
      • 4.1.3Relationship between P-resultative and passive in Yaqui
      • 4.1.4Triggering feature for the Yaqui monovalent resultative marking
    • 4.2Bivalent resultatives in Yaqui
      • 4.2.1A-resultative in Yaqui
      • 4.2.2Relationship between A-resultative and perfect in Yaqui
      • 4.2.3R-resultative in Yaqui and its relationship with applicative
      • 4.2.4Bivalent S-resultative
      • 4.2.5Relationship between bivalent S-resultative and external possession
  • 5.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.120.06alv
References (31)
References
Álvarez González, Albert. 2007. Construcciones de aspecto resultativo en yaqui. In Mecanismos de voz y formación de palabra, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Albert Álvarez González, Lilián Guerrero & María Belén Carpio (eds), 17–44. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
. 2010. Eventos no-agentivos, alternancia causativo/incoativo y gramaticalización en lengua yaqui. Lingüística Mexicana IV(2007): 5–30.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1982. The ‘perfect’ as a universal and as a language-particular category. In Tense and Aspect [Typological Studies in Language 1], Paul Hopper (ed.), 227–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the language of the world. Studies in Language 13(1): 53–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Aspect and voice: Some reflexions on perfect and passive. In Tense and Aspect [Syntax and Semantics 14], Philip J. Tedeschi & Annie Zaenen (eds), 65–78. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Possible verbs and the structure of events. In Meanings and Prototypes, Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), 48–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Garey, Howard B. 1957. Verbal aspects in French. Language 33: 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, Lilián. 2007. Estructuras argumentales alternativas: Las cláusulas aplicativas en yaqui. In Mecanismos de voz y formación de palabra, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Albert Álvarez González, Lilián Guerrero & María Belén Carpio (eds), 177–204. México: Editorial Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Müller-Bardey, Thomas. 2001. Valency change. In Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Vol. 2 [Handbücher zur Sprach‑ und Kommunikationswissenschaft], Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), 1130–1145. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1992. From resultative to perfect in ancient Greek. Función 11–12: 187–224.Google Scholar
. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2011. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 2001. Internal and external possessor. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 970–978. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Les constructions à possesseur externe dans les langues de l’Europe. In Actance et Valence dans les langues de l’Europe, Jack Feuillet (ed.), 525–606. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. 1995. Even. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen. 2011. Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121: 35–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin, Haspelmath & Bernard, Comrie. 2010. Ditransitive construction: A typological overview. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath, & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij S. 1988. Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Languages 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P . 2001. Resultative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 928–940. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jaxontov, Sergej Je. 1988. The typology of Resultative Constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Languages 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris & Barshi, Immanuel (eds). 1999. External Possession [Typological Studies in Language 39]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 1998. Inflection. In The Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 13–43. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Juárez, Cristian & Albert Álvarez González
2017. The antipassive marking in Mocoví. In Verb Valency Changes [Typological Studies in Language, 120], ► pp. 228 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.