Cover not available
Part of
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 129–190

Chapter 4
The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian

| Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon
| Northwest Indian Language Institute, University of Oregon
Sahaptin and Nez Perce, the two languages of the Sahaptian family, have both been cited as case studies in the typological literature on hierarchical patterns in main clause grammar. Nez Perce has ergative case marking on only third person singular transitive subjects, plus a minor pattern of indexation of SAP participants via (rarely occurring) second position enclitics. Sahaptin has one of the more complex hierarchical systems ever described, with SAP indexation via enclitics, third person indexation on verbs, differential object marking, an inverse verbal direction prefix, and two distinct ergative suffixes, each restricted to a subset of third person singular transitive subjects (one when objects are SAP, the other when objects are third person). This paper begins by reviewing, evaluating, and occasionally expanding on existing knowledge: we summarize the hierarchical patterns in Sahaptian and characterize each distinct construction. Then we compare relevant Sahaptin morphemes with cognates in Nez Perce, and review their reconstruction to Proto-Sahaptian. The primary contribution of this paper is organizing the morphemes (and their accompanying hierarchical patterns) in both languages into cognate constructions, then reconstructing each to its Proto-Sahaptian origins. We conclude by reviewing and evaluating proposals for Pre-Proto-Sahaptian developments claimed to explain the origins of hierarchical patterns that reconstruct to Proto-Sahaptian. The mechanisms we identify as having created the Sahaptian hierarchical effects are diverse, some motivated and others not, some arising from internal sources, others arguably from contact.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The Sahaptian language family and its hierarchical patterns
  • 2.Previously described hierarchies in Sahaptin
    • 2.1Hierarchical patterns in Sahaptin
      • 2.1.1Intransitive clauses
      • 2.1.2Mixed direct quadrant
      • 2.1.3Local quadrant
      • 2.1.4 Mixed inverse quadrant
      • 2.1.5Nonlocal quadrant
    • 2.2 Aligning the morphemes and constructions
      • 2.2.1Coding arguments: Morphology
      • 2.2.2Coding arguments: Constructions
  • 3.Reconstructing hierarchical morphology to Proto-Sahaptian
    • 3.1Enclitics
    • 3.2Verbal indexation
    • 3.3Case marking
  • 4.Reconstructing the main clause constructions of Proto-Sahaptian
    • 4.1Reconstructing the Proto-Sahaptian direct, local, and inverse quadrants
      • 4.1.1Enclitics
      • 4.1.2Verbal prefixes
      • 4.1.3Case markers
    • 4.2 Reconstructing the Proto-Sahaptian nonlocal quadrant
      • 4.2.1The *nonlocal direct construction
      • 4.2.2The *3pl.A direct and *3pl.O inverse constructions
      • 4.2.3 The *nonlocal inverse construction
      • 4.2.4Summary of nonlocal constructions
  • 5.Discussion: The sources of hierarchical patterns in the Sahaptian family
    • 5.1 Pronouns and verbal indexation
    • 5.2Case marking
    • 5.3Passive to inverse
    • 5.4Contact and pattern copying
    • 5.5In lieu of a conclusion
  • Appendix
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.04gil
References (76)
References
Aoki, Haruo. 1970. Nez Perce Grammar [University of California Publications in Linguistics 62]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Nez Perce Texts [University of California Publications in Linguistics 90]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2014. Syntax and syntactic reconstruction. In The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds), 343–373. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2012. Reconstructing syntax: Construction Grammar and the comparative method. In Sign-Based Construction Grammar, Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds), 257–308. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Gildea, Spike. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Grammar 18], Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds), 1–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavert, Virginia & Jansen, Joana. 2013. Agent case marking in Sahaptian. In Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation. In Honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103], Tim Thornes, Gwendolyn Hyslop, Joana Jansen and Erik Andvik (eds), 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blackburn Morrow, Jesse. 2006. Topicality and the Inverse Voice in Umatilla Sahaptin: An Experimental Study. MA thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1940. Race, Language and Culture. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2010. Ergative case and the transitive subject: A view from Nez Perce. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 73–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57: 626–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Lectures on functional syntax. Notes for the Summer School, July 2001, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
. 2014. Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Languages of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1): 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott & Golla, Victor. 1997. The Penutian hypothesis: Retrospect and prospect. International Journal of American Linguistics 63: 171–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estival, Dominique & Myhill, John. 1988. Formal and functional aspects of the development from passive to ergative systems. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 441–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2008. Reciprocal constructions: Towards a structural typology. In Reciprocals and Reflexives: Corss-Linguistic and Theoretical Explorations, Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds), 33–104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fadden, Lorna Marie. 2000. The Inverse Continuum. MA thesis, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1994. Semantic and pragmatic inverse: ‘Inverse alignment’ and ‘inverse voice’ in Carib of Surinam. In Givón (ed.), 187–230.Google Scholar
. 1998. On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Castro Alves, Flávia. In Press. Reconstructing the source of nominative-absolutive alignment in two Amazonian language families. In Reconstructing Syntax: Cognates and Directionality, Eugenio Luján, Jóhanna Barðdal & Spike Gildea (eds). Leiden: Brill.
Gildea, Spike & Zúñiga, Fernando. 2016. Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Journal of Linguistics 54(3): 483–529.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1994. Introduction. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed.), 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2018. From ergative case-marking to hierarchical agreement: A reconstruction of the argument-marking system of Reyesano (Takanan, Bolivia). In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haig, Geoffrey. 2008. Alignment Change in Iranian Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hargus, Sharon & Beavert, Virginia. 2002. Predictable versus underlying vocalism in Yakima Sahaptin. International Journal of American Linguistics 68: 316–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. High-ranking affix faithfulness in Yakima Sahaptin. In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Don Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds), 177–185. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1): 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. Pragmatic skewing in 1 ↔ 2 pronominal combinations in Amerindian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64: 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunn, Eugene S. 2000. Review of Linguistic Information. Kennewick Man, Cultural Affiliation Report. Department of the Interior and National Park Service. <[URL]> (19 December 2009).
Hunn, Eugene S. & Selam, James. 1990. Nch’i-wána, “The Big River”, Mid-Columbia Indians and their Land. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Virginia. 1984. Some features of Warm Springs Sahaptin. Working Papers of Linguistics Circle of University of Victoria 4: 229–235.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio. 2012. Towards a Typological Study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation. PhD dissertation, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Melville. 1929. Northwest Sahaptin texts. University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 2(6): 175–244. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
. 1931. A Sketch of Northern Sahaptin grammar. University of Washington Publications in Anthropology 4(6): 85–291. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
. 1934. Northwest Sahaptin texts (English Translations). Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology, Vol. 19, Part 1. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
. 1937. Northwest Sahaptin texts (Indian Text). Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology, Vol. 19, Part 2. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Jansen, Joana. 2010. A Grammar of Yakima Ichishkíin/Sahaptin. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
. 2012a. Ditransitive alignment in Yakima Sahaptin. Linguistic Discovery 10(3): 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Joana & Beavert, Virginia. 2012b. Plurality and hierarchical alignment in Northwest Sahaptin. Presented at the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon, 7 January.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale. 1989. When patients are topics: Topic maintenance in North American Indian Languages. International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages 24: 1–41.Google Scholar
. 1990. Sorting out third persons in Salishan discourse. International Journal of American Linguistics 56: 341–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Transmontane lexical borrowing in Salish. International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages 30: 27–46.Google Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale, Elmendorf, William W., Rigsby, Bruce & Aoki, Haruo. 1998. Languages. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 12: Plateau , Deward E. Walker Jr. (ed.), 30–51. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2000. Reciprocals without reflexives. In Reciprocals: Forms and Functions [Typological Studies in Language 41], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds), 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B. 2009. A typology of ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 480–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2006. Integrating approaches to diversity: Argument structure on the NW coast. In Diversity in Language: Perspectives and Implications, Yoshiko Matsumoto, David Oshima, Orrin Robinson & Peter Sells (eds), 9–36. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2012. Core argument patterns and deep genetic relations: Hierarchical systems in Northern California. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie, & Valery Solovyev (eds), 258–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2014. The grammaticalization chain of case functions: Extension and reanalysis of case-marking vs. universals of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 69–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pharris, Nicholas & Thomason, Sarah. 2005. Lexical transfer between Southern Interior Salish and Molalla-Sahaptian. International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages 40: 184–210.Google Scholar
Phinney, Archie. 1934. Nez Percé Texts. Reprint: New York NY: AMS Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Rigsby, Bruce & Rude, Noel. 1996. Sketch of Sahaptin, a Sahaptian language. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 17: Languages , Ives Goddard & William C. Sturtevant (eds), 666–92. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel. 1985. Studies in Nez Perce Grammar and Discourse. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
. 1988. Ergative, passive, and antipassive in Nez Perce: A discourse perspective. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 547–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. On the origin of the Nez Perce ergative NP suffix. International Journal of American Linguistics 57: 24–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Direct, inverse and passive in Northwest Sahaptin. In Voice and Inversion, Talmy Givón (ed), 101–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. On the history of nominal case in Sahaptian. International Journal of American Linguistics 63: 113–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Transitivity in Northwest Sahaptin. Journal of Northwest Linguistics 3: 1–37.Google Scholar
. 2012. Reconstructing Proto-Sahaptian sounds. International Conference on Salish and Neighboring Languages 47: 292–324.Google Scholar
. n.d. Proto-Sahaptian Glossary. Ms.
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Chad. 1994. Passive and inverse constructions. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed), 47–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zahir, Zalmai. 2018. Incipient hierarchical alignment in four Central Salish languages from the Proto-Salish middle. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zavala Maldonado, Roberto. 2011. Reciprocal constructions in Olutec. In Reciprocals and Semantic Typology [Typological Studies in Language 98], Nicholas Evans, Alice Gaby, Stephen C. Levinson & Asifa Majid (eds), 265–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2006. Deixis and Alignment: Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal
2023. From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language 47:4 ► pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
DeLancey, Scott
2018. Chapter 10. Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman SAP indexation. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Guillaume, Antoine
2018. Chapter 6. From ergative case-marking to hierarchical agreement. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.