Cover not available
Part of
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 309–342

Chapter 9
Incipient hierarchical alignment in four Central Salish languages from the Proto-Salish middle

 | University of Oregon
There are three distinct transitive constructions in four Coast Salish languages, Squamish, Halkomelem, Klallam and Lushootseed. In the V-tr construction, both A and P are unmarked for case; in the V-mid construction (often considered antipassive), A is unmarked and P marked; in the V-tr-mid construction (often considered passive), P is unmarked and A marked. Individually, none of these constructions is a hierarchical system, but in combination, asymmetries in their distribution are well on the way to creating a person-based hierarchical system. This paper discusses the diachronic development of each of these constructions, then describes their differential distribution into the four functional domains: local (SAP A → SAP P), direct (SAP → 3P), nonlocal (3A → 3P), and inverse (3A → SAP P). While the distribution is not identical in each of the languages, the trend is clear: the etymologically passive V-tr-mid construction cannot occur in the direct domain and has become the pragmatically unmarked construction in the inverse domain, whereas the etymologically antipassive V-mid construction cannot occur in the inverse domain. While it only occurs in the direct and nonlocal domains, even there it is rare, giving the appearance that its function is still that of an antipassive. In combination, the result is that whenever the two core arguments of a clause are an SAP and a third person, regardless of grammatical role the SAP participant is always an unmarked core argument, whereas the third person is most often marked, leading to a situation where the oblique case in these languages is beginning to resemble the obviative case-marker of inverse languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Introducing and reconstructing the three distinct constructions
    • 2.1The transitive (tr) construction
    • 2.2 The reflexive > middle > antipassive construction
      • 2.2.1Reflexive
      • 2.2.2Middle
      • 2.2.3Antipassive
    • 2.3The transitive-reflexive > passive (-tr-mid) construction
  • 3.Towards creating the hierarchy: The synchronic distribution of the three constructions
    • 3.1The local quadrant
    • 3.2The inverse quadrant
    • 3.3The direct quadrant
    • 3.4The nonlocal quadrant
  • 4.Discussion
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.121.09zah
References (36)
References
Bates, Dawn, Hesss, Thom & Hilbert, Vi. 1994. Lushootseed Dictionary. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique, 2: La phrase. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Schepper, Kees. 2010. The space between one and two transitives, intransitives and the middle voice Transitivity. In Transitivity: Form, Meaning, Acquisition, and Processing, Patrick Brandt & Marco Garcia Garcia (eds), 191–207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. 1997. Mapping Halkomelem voice. In Salish Languages and Linguistics: Theoretical and Descriptive Perspectives, Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins & M. Dale Kinkade (eds), 305–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E. 2006. The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics 48: 44–81.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1994. Introduction. In Voice and Inversion. Ed. T. Givón, pp. 3–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Syntax. A Functional-typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1997. Evolution of grammatical relations in Cariban: How functional motivation precedes syntactic change. In Grammatical Relations: A Functionalist Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 35], T. Givón (ed.), 155–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Are there universal cognitive motivations for ergativity? In L’ergativité en Amazonie, Vol. 2, Francesc Queixalós (ed.), 1–37. Brasília: CNRS, IRD and Laboratório de Línguas Indígenas, UnB.Google Scholar
. 2014. Diachronic typology of passive in the Cariban family. Paper read at the Workshop: Voice systems in diachrony: A comparative perspective. University of Pavia, Italy, 11 September.
Gildea, Spike & Fernando Zúñiga. 2016. Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Linguistics 54(3): 483–529.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. The grammaticization of passive morphology. In Studies in Language 14.1:25–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and crosslinguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–242. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess, Thom & Hilbert, Vi. 1978a. Lushootseed, 1. Seattle WA: Daybreak Star Press.Google Scholar
. 1978b. Lushootseed, 2. Seattle WA: Daybreak Star Press.Google Scholar
Hess, Thom. 1993. A schema for the presentation of Lushootseed verb stems. In American Indian Linguistics and Ethnography in Honor of Laurence C. Thomas, Anthony Mattina & Timothy Montler (eds). Missoula MT: Linguistics Laboratory, University of Montana.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Peter. 1994. The inverse in Squamish. In Voice and Inversion [Typological Studies in Language 28], T. Givón (ed.), 121–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiyosawa, Kaoru & Gerdts, Donna B. (eds). 2010. Salish Applicatives. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, James D. 1999. The Salish Language Family: Reconstructing Syntax. Lincoln ME: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2007. Integrating approaches to diversity: Argument structure on the NW coast. In Diversity in Language: Perspectives and Implications, Yoshiko Matsumoto, David Oshima, Orrin Robinson & Peter Sells (eds), 1–28. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2012. Core argument patterns and deep genetic relations: Hierarchical systems in Northern California. In Typology of Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations, Bernard Comrie (ed.), 257–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montler, Timothy. 2001. Auxiliaries and other grammatical categories in Klallam. University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 237–264.Google Scholar
. 2003. Auxiliaries and other categories in Straits Salish. International Journal of American Linguistics 69: 103–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Klallam language models and dialogs. unpublished ms.Google Scholar
. 2010. A Double Passive Construction in Klallam. Bellingham WA: Whatcom Museum.Google Scholar
. 2012. Klallam Dictionary. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Squamish Nation Education Department. 2011. Skwxwu7mesh Snichim-Xweliten Snichim Skexwts; Squamish-English Dictionary. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Zahir, Zalmai. 2000. sx̌alx̌al ʔə tiił tuʔiišədčəł; Writings of Our People. Redondo WA: Zahir Consulting Services.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming(a). Elements of Grammar, Syntax and Discourse in Lushootseed. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
. Forthcoming(b). A Lushootseed Analysis of an 1877 Dictionary by George Gibbs.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sapién, Racquel-María, Natalia Cáceres Arandia, Spike Gildea & Sérgio Meira
2021. Chapter 3. Antipassive in the Cariban family. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Gildea, Spike & Joana Jansen
2018. Chapter 4. The development of referential hierarchy effects in Sahaptian. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121], ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.