Part of
Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony
Edited by Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga
[Typological Studies in Language 121] 2018
► pp. 128
References

References

Aissen, Judith
2003Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2016Synchronic vs. Diachronic Explanations and the Nature of the Language Faculty. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 11–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristar, Anthony R.
1991On diachronic sources and synchronic patterns: An investigation into the origin of linguistic universals. Language 67: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2001The Atoms of Language. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & McCloskey, James
2007On the relation of typology to theoretical syntax. Linguistic Typology 11: 285–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2007Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11: 239–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2014Evolutionary phonology and the life cycle of voiceless sonorants. [URL]
2004Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, Vit
1998A Historical Syntax of Late Middle Indo-Aryan (Apabhraṃśa) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 165]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1988The diachronic dimension in explanation. In Explaining Language Universals, John A. Hawkins (ed.), 350–379. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Language change and universals. In Linguistic Universals, Ricardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds), 179–194. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Formal universals as emergent phenomena: The origins of structure preservation. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 108–121. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1980Inverse verb forms in Siberia: Evidence from Chukchee, Koryak, and Kamchadal. Folia Linguistica 1: 61–74.Google Scholar
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2000Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2018The obligatory coding principle in diachronic perspective. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2011Language universals and linguistic knowledge. In Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 227–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013The referential hierarchy: Reviewing the evidence in diachronic perspective. In Languages across Boundaries: Studies in the Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 69–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Competing motivations and diachrony: What evidence for what motivations? In MacWhinney, Malchukov & Moravcsik (eds), 282–298.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Implicational universals and dependencies between grammatical phenomena. In Dependencies in Language: On the Causal Ontology of Linguistic Systems, Nicholas Enfield (ed.), 9–24. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2003Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57: 626–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55: 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Functionalism and the metalanguage – Theory confusion. In Phonology, Morphology, and the Empirical Imperative: Papers in Honour of Bruce Derwing, Grace Wiebe, Gary Libben, Tom Priestly, Ron Smyth & Sam Wang (eds), 27–59. Taipei: The Crane.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John A.
1985Competing motivations. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 343–366. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
1990The origin of NP split ergativity. Language 66: 261–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike
1998On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Zúñiga, Fernando
2016Referential hierarchies: A new look at some historical and typological patterns. Linguistics (54): 483–529.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2001Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1966Language Universals, with Particular Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1978Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 1: Method and Theory, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles H. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsick (eds), 62–91. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1995The diachronic typological approach. In Approaches to Language Typology, Masayoshi Shibatani & Theadora Bynon (eds), 145–166. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Aaron
2018Diachrony and the referential hierarchy in Old Irish. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2005Occurrence of nominal plurality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Bernard Comrie, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Martin Haspelmath (eds), 142–145. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42: 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008aCreating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 185–214. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bDescriptive scales versus comparative scales. In Richards & Malchukov (eds), 39–53.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1983Word Order Universals. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1994A Performance Theory of Word Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1996Pragmatic skewing in 1<->2 pronominal combinations in native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64: 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Song, Kyung An
2011On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47: 1–44. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary
2008The rise and fall of semantic alignment in Northern Halmahera, Indonesia. In The Typology of Semantic Alignment , Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), 252–276. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2011A panchronic study of aspirated fricatives, with new evidence from Pumi. Lingua 121: 1518–1538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016On the directionality of analogy in a Dhegiha paradigm. International Journal of American Linguistics 82: 239–248.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2008Universals constrain change; Change results in typological generalizations. In Linguistic Universals and Language Change, Jeff Good (ed.), 23–53. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Zúñiga, Fernando
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Hunter T. & Macaulay, Monica
2012Prominence hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass 36: 431–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Malchukov, Andrej & Moravcsik, Edith
(eds). 2014Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2000A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4: 307–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaud, Alexis, Jacques, Guillaume & Rankin, Robert L.
Mithun, Marianne
1991aActive / agentive case marking and its motivation. Language 67: 510–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991bThe develoment of bound pronominal paradigms. In Language Typology 1988: Typological Models in Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 81], Winfred P. Lehmann & Helen-Jo Jakusz Hewitt (eds), 85–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Reconstructing the unidentified. In Historical Linguistics 1989 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 106] Henk Aertsen & Robert J. Jeffers (eds), 329–347. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Functional perspectives on syntactic change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Richard D. Janda & Brian D. Joseph (eds), 552–572. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Ergativity and language contact on the Oregon Coast: Alsea, Siuslaw, and Coosan. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 77–95. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2008The emergence of agentive systems in core argument marking. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds), The Typology of Semantic Alignment, 297–333. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Deconstructing teleology: The place of synchronic usage patterns among processes of diachronic development. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne & Chafe, Wallace
1999What are S, A, and O? Studies in Language 23: 569–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A.
1978On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45: 233–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002Optimality and functionality: A critique of functionally-based optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 43–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Possible and Probable Languages. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Marc & Malchukov, Andrej L.
2008Scales. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise
2018Are the Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexing systems really motivated by the person hierarchy? In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language 121], Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume)DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aborigenal Studies.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2001Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard D.
2005Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando
2006Deixis and Alignment [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Deixis and alignment: How many hierarchies, really? Evidence from several Algonquian languages. In Richards & Malchukov (eds), 99–129.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Ballarè, Silvia & Guglielmo Inglese
2022. The development of locative relative markers. Studies in Language 46:1  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Berman, Ruth A. & Elitzur Dattner
2020. Introduction. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chappell, Hilary
2024. From oblique to core case in the Southern Min languages. Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:1  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2018. Chapter 3. Deconstructing teleology. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Rose, Françoise
2018. Chapter 8. Are the Tupi-Guarani hierarchical indexing systems really motivated by the person hierarchy?. In Typological Hierarchies in Synchrony and Diachrony [Typological Studies in Language, 121],  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.