Cover not available
Part of
Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages
Edited by Simon E. Overall, Rosa Vallejos and Spike Gildea
[Typological Studies in Language 122] 2018
► pp. 365–402

Chapter 14
Reconstructing the copulas and nonverbal predicate constructions in Cariban

 | University of Oregon
This paper represents a first effort to characterize the different kinds of nonverbal predicate constructions in the Cariban family, to identify the functions served by copulas, and then to reconstruct the various attested copular forms to a limited number of source forms in Proto-Cariban. Given limitations of space, it is not possible to illustrate all of the cognate nonverbal predicate constructions attested in all of the languages, so the comparative look at the constructions is more programmatic, offering illustrations of the alternatives attested so far in the literature as a way to orient future field studies of nonverbal predication in Cariban languages. In contrast, the reconstruction of the copulas is as detailed as possible given the forms available in the current descriptive literature.
Keywords: nonverbal predicate constructions, Cariban, Proto-Cariban
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntax of nonverbal predicates in the Cariban family
    • 2.1The juxtaposition construction: NP predicates with no copula
    • 2.2Copular constructions: Adverbial predicates (PP or Adverb)
    • 2.3Existential constructions
    • 2.4Other constructions that use the copula (in more of an auxiliary function)
  • 3.Morphology of copulas in the Cariban family
    • 3.1Reconstructing three inflections with *a/*ap ‘cop1’
    • 3.2Reconstructing *eti ‘dwell’ > ‘cop2’
    • 3.3Looking for more cognates: Relic zones
  • 4.A first approximation of the story of copular innovation in Cariban
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 21 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.122.14gil
References (41)
References
Abbott, Miriam. 1991. Macushi. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 3, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 23–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Álvarez, José. 1998. Split ergativity and complementary distribution of NPs and pronominal affixes in Pemón (Cariban). Opción 25: 69–94. Maracaibo, Venezuela: Universidad de Zúlia.Google Scholar
. 2005a. The morphosyntax of clausal negation in Kari’ña, Cariban. Núcleo 17(22): 9–39. <[URL]>
. 2005b. Predicación no verbal en pemón y kari’ña: ¿Un camino universal en la gramaticalización? Presented at Grammaire des Langues caribes – Grammar of Cariban Languages, CELIA-CNRS, Villejuif, December.
. 2015. El pemón y la rama venezolana de lenguas caribes. Presented at Venezuelan Cariban: Working Conference on the Lexicon and Morphosyntax, DDL, Lyon, France, May.
Bruno, Ana Carla dos Santos. 2003. Waimiri Atroari Grammar: Some Phonological, Morphological and Syntactic Aspects. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Cáceres, Natalia. 2011. Grammaire Fonctionnelle-typologique Du Ye’kwana, langue Caribe du Venezuela. PhD dissertation, Université Lyon.Google Scholar
. 2014. Pronombres con función innovadora en predicados no verbales ye’kwana. Paper presented at Amazónicas 5: La estructura de las lenguas amazónicas: Fonología y sintaxis. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi & Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil, May.Google Scholar
Carlin, Eithne. 2004. A grammar of Trio, a Cariban language of Suriname [Duisburg Papers on Research in Language and Culture 55]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2014. Functive phrases in typological and diachronic perspective. Studies in Language 38(3): 605–647 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985. Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1987. Copula auxiliarization: How and why? In Historical Development of Auxiliaries, Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds), 53–84. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Clause types. Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol 1: Clause Structure, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224–275. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira Alves, Ana Carolina. 2014. Predicação não-verbal em Arara (Karib). Paper presented at Amazónicas 5: La estructura de las lenguas amazónicas: Fonología y sintaxis. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi & Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil, May.
Fleck, David. 2003. A grammar of Matses (Panoan). PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Franchetto, Bruna. 2010. The ergativity effect in Kuikuro (Southern Carib, Brazil). In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds), 121–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The copula -i in Kuikuro non-verbal predication and beyond. Paper presented at Amazónicas 5: La estructura de las lenguas amazónicas: fonología y sintaxis. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi & Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil, May.
Gildea, Spike. 1989. Simple and Relative Clauses in Panare. MA thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
. 1993. The development of tense markers from demonstrative pronouns in Panare (Cariban). Studies in Language 17: 53–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. A comparative description of syllable reduction in the Cariban language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 61: 62–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax [Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics 18]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. Akawaio (Cariban) and typologies of nonverbal predication. Paper presented at Grammaire des Langues Caribes – Grammar of Cariban Languages, CELIA-CNRS, Villejuif.
. 2012. Linguistic studies in the Cariban family. In Handbook of South American Languages, Lyle Campbell & Veronica Grondona (eds), 441–494. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2015. On the diachrony of the Bantu copula ni . In The Diachrony of Grammar, Vol. 1, ch. 6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Robert. 1998. Waiwai. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 25–202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoff, Berend J. 1968. The Carib Language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehn, Edward & Koehn, Sally. 1986. Apalaí. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 33–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neves Lacerda, Edith Maria. 1991. Waimiri-Atroari: Observações Linguísticas. Manaus: Programa Waimiri-Atroari (Convênio Eletronorte / FUNAI).Google Scholar
Meira, Sérgio. 1999. A Grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
. 2005. Cariban languages. In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistic Theory, Keith Brown (ed.), 199–204. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2006. Orações relativas em línguas Karíb. Boletím Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Ciências humanas 1(1): 105–121. <[URL]>
. 2015. Elaboration of TAM suffixes by addition of particles in Parukotoan (Cariban). Paper presented at the workshop Diachronic Syntax in South American Languages. Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage, Lyon, France, May.
Meira, Sérgio & Gildea, Spike. 2009. Property concepts in the Cariban family: Adjectives, adverbs and/or nouns? In The Linguistics of Endangered Languages – Contributions to Morphology and Morphosyntax, W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), 95–133. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Christiane. 2005. The Language of the Apinajé People of Central Brazil. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Frantomé. 2001. Morfossintaxe do verbo Ikpeng. PhD dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP).Google Scholar
. 2014. Predicação não-verbal em Ikpéng: Uma contribuição para o estudo da cópula nas línguas Karib. Paper presented at Amazónicas 5: La estructura de las lenguas amazónicas: Fonología y sintaxis. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi & Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil, May.
Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas & Payne, Doris. 2013. A typological Reference Grammar of Panare. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc. 1992. Auxiliares de postura corporal en sikuani. In II Congreso del C.C.E.L.A., Lenguas aborígenes de Colombia, Vol. 2, 185–197. Bogota: Memorias Bogotá & C.C.E.L.A., Universidad de los Andes.Google Scholar
Tavares, Petronila. 2005. A Grammar of Wayana. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gildea, Spike & Jóhanna Barðdal
2023. From grammaticalization to Diachronic Construction Grammar. Studies in Language 47:4 ► pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Luca Ciucci & Margherita Farina
2019. Two types of morphologically expressed non-verbal predication. Studies in Language 43:1 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.