Part of
Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 213256
References (30)
References
Aissen, Judith. 1999. Markedness and subject choice in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17(4): 673–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2011. Grammatical relations typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammatical Relations, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 399–444. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara. 2004. On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 95–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3): 626–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1997. A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, 71–113, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William. 1998. Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at the 3rd LFG conference, Brisbane, 30 June–3 July.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery 3(1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2006. A Grammar of Movima. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
. 2009a. Hierarchical alignment in Movima. International Journal of American Linguistics 75(4): 513–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Reference and predication in Movima. In New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 323–342. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010a. ‘She kisses her late husband’ = ‘she kissed her husband’: nominal tense marking in Movima. In Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity, Michael Cysouw & Jan Wohlgemuth (eds), 95–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. The intransitive basis of Movima clause structure. In Ergativity in Amazonia[Typological Studies in Language 89] Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds), 285–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. Referring to states and events: subordination in Movima. In Subordination in South American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 141–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Argument encoding in Movima: The local domain. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4): 559–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The expression of three-participant events in Movima. Linguistic Discovery 10(3): 80–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Animacy and inverse voice in Movima: A corpus study. Anthropological Linguistics 56(3–4): 294–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018a. Nonverbal predication in Movima. In Nonverbal predication in Amazonian Languages [Typological Studies in Language 122], Simon Overall, Rosa Vallejos & Spike Gildea (eds), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. A topic-marking cleft? Analyzing clause-initial pronouns in Movima. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages: Studies in Prosody and Syntax[Studies in Language Companion Series 199] Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina & Zúñiga, Fernando. 2016. Inverse and symmetrical voice: On languages with two transitive constructions. Linguistics 54(3): 443–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. Tagalog. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds), 350–376. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008. Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, Peter Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds), 247–293. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2009. Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35(1): 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 305–334. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1976. “The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 491–518. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1988. Voice in Philippine languages. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 85–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Rober M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Zúñiga, Fernando. 2006. Deixis and Alignment. Inverse Systems in Indigenous Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 70]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Haude, Katharina
2018. Chapter 8. Nonverbal predication in Movima. In Nonverbal Predication in Amazonian Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 122],  pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Haude, Katharina
2021. Clefting and nominal predication: Two focus-marking constructions in Movima. Faits de Langues 52:1  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Haude, Katharina
2022. Expressing directional caused accompanied motion in Movima. In Caused Accompanied Motion [Typological Studies in Language, 134],  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.