Cover not available
Part of
Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations
Edited by Alena Witzlack-Makarevich and Balthasar Bickel
[Typological Studies in Language 123] 2019
► pp. 433–467

Grammatical relations in Yaqui

| IIFL-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

This paper describes a number of selectors for grammatical relations in Yaqui. The main selectors discussed in the paper include case marking, word order, suppletion, passive and valency-increasing mechanisms, control and anaphoric constructions. The study reveals two crucial aspects: Yaqui is a good example of a language where grammatical relations can be characterized as a construction-specific category, and the distinction between core and non-core arguments is essential to determine the selected argument in particular constructions.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Case marking
  • 3.Word order
  • 4.Suppletion and number marking
  • 5.Dative case, oblique arguments and adjuncts
  • 6.Double-object constructions and valence-change mechanisms
    • 6.1Three-place predicates.
    • 6.2Applicative constructions.
    • 6.3Causative constructions.
  • 7.Control constructions
  • 8.Anaphoric constructions
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.12gue
References
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.
2005 The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belloro, Valeria & Guerrero, Lilián
2010a Sobre la función discursiva de la posposición de constituyentes en yaqui. In Análisis lingüístico: Enfoques sincrónico, diacrónico e interdisciplinario[Estudios Lingüísticos 2], Rosa María Ortíz Ciscomani (ed.), 71–95. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
2010b On word order and information structure in the Yaqui. In Information Structure in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, José Camacho, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo & Liliana Sánchez (eds), 115–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa, Gullberg, Marianne, Majid, Asifa & Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2004 Put project: The crosslinguistic encoding of placement events. In Field Manual, Vol. 9, Asifa Majid (ed.), 10–18. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1982 Grammatical relations in Huichol. In Syntactic and Semantics. Studies in Transitivity, Paul J. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 95–115. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dedrick, John & Casad, Eugene
1999 Sonora Yaqui Language Structure. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
1986 Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative. Language 62(4): 808–845. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escalante, Fernando
1990 Voice and Argument Structure in Yaqui. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Estrada Fernández, Zarina
2009 Yaqui de Sonora. Mexico: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Estrada Fernández, Zarina, Buitimea Valenzuela, Crescencio, Gurrola Camacho, Adriana Elizabeth, Castillo Celaya, María Elena & Carlón Flores, Anabela
2004 Diccionario yaqui-español y textos. Mexico: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Félix Armendáriz, Rolando
2000 Las relaciones gramaticales en yaqui: Un análisis en el marco de la Gramática del Rol y Referencia. MA thesis, University of Sonora.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Lilián & Robert D. Van Valin Jr..
2004 Yaqui and the analysis of primary object languages. The International Journal of American Linguistics 70(3): 290–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, Lilián
2006 The Structure and Function of Yaqui Complementation. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2008 Yaqui causation, its form-function interface. In Studies in Voice and Transitivity, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Sören Wichmann, Claudine Chamoreau & Albert Álvarez González (eds), 201–221. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2017 On purpose, causal and reason clauses in Yaqui. The International Journal of American Linguistics 83(4): 679–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Propiedades formales y funcionales de las posposiciones en yaqui. In Adposiciones y elementos de su tipo en lenguas de América, L. Guerrero (ed). México: UNAM.Google Scholar
Submitted a. Supleción en yaqui y wixárika.
Submitted b. La codificación de eventos de poner y remover en yaqui.
Gurrola, Adriana
2005 Posesión e individuación en yaqui. MA thesis, Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth, LaVerne, Jeanne & Pranka, Paul
1991 On suppletion, selection, and agreement. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, Carol Georgopoulos & Roberta Ishihara (eds), 225–270. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi, Tubino, Mercedes & Haugen, Jason
2006 Applicative constructions and suppletive verbs in Hiaki. Paper presented at the Complex Predicates Workshop, Rice University.Google Scholar
INEGI
2010 Censo de población y vivienda. [URL]
Jelinek, Eloise & Escalante, Fernando
2000 Unaccusative and unergative verbs in Yaqui. In Uto-Aztecan: Structural, Temporal and Geographic Perspectives, 171–182. Mexico: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jean B.
1962 El idioma yaqui. Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, Jelinek
1973 Yaqui Syntax. Berkeley BA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Roland W
1977 An Overview of Uto-Aztecan Grammar. Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar 1(1) . Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1988 Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. In Theoretical Morphology, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 211–234. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rude, Noel
1996 Cláusulas de objetos dobles en yaqui. In Memorias del III Encuentro de Lingüística del Noroeste, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Max Figueroa Esteva & Gerardo López Cruz (eds), 191–214. México: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Silva Encinas, Manuel Carlos, Buitimea Valenzuela, Crescencio, Alvarez Romero
, Pablo & Estrada Fernández, Zarina 1998 Jiak nokpo etejoim, Pláticas en lengua yaqui. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. & Fennig, Charles D.
2017 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 20th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. [URL]Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. & Charles D. Fennig
(eds.) 2018 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Twenty-first edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
2007 Towards a typology of complement control. In Studies in Complement Control [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47], Barbara Stiebels (ed.), 1–80. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Robert D., Van Valin
1990 Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2): 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert D., Van Valin Jr. & LaPolla, Randy
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
2005 Exploring the Syntax-Semantic-interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, Verónica
1996 El Participante no sujeto en Cora: Orden de palabras, codificación y marcación de número. In Memorias del III Encuentro de Lingüística del Noroeste, Zarina Estrada Fernández, Max Figueroa Esteva & Gerardo López Cruz (eds), 533–554. México: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar