Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 197–248

Chapter 4
Case markers as subordinators in South American indigenous languages

| University of Zurich
Nominalization (in different forms and guises) is one of the most common subordination strategies in South American indigenous languages. A frequently used nominalization strategy is to use case markers to indicate the semantic or structural relationship of the nominalized clause to the proposition expressed in the main clause. This paper aims to establish the extent to which these extensions of case markers to subordinate clauses are non-random, and to separate the role of language contact, genealogical retention, and universal preferences in explaining the distribution of case markers as subordinators in South American indigenous languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Preliminaries
  • 3.Case systems in South American languages and their extensions to subordinate clauses
    • 3.1Presence of case
    • 3.2Core case
    • 3.3Dative cases
    • 3.4Comitatives and instruments
    • 3.5Spatial cases
    • 3.6Oblique cases
    • 3.7Other cases
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.04gij
References (113)
References
Adelaar, Willem. 2008. Towards a typological profile of the Andean languages. In Evidence and Counter-Evidence. Essays in Honour of Frederik Kortlandt, Vol. 2: General Linguistics, Alexander Lubotsky, Jos Schaeken & Jeroen Wiedenhof (eds), 23–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adelaar, Willem with Pieter Muysken. 2004. The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 65–106.Google Scholar
2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003. A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alves, Flavia. 2004. O Timbira falado pelos canela apãniekrá: uma contribuição aos estudos da morfossintaxe de uma língua Jê. PhD dissertation Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paolo.Google Scholar
Andrade-Martins, Silvana. 2004. Fonologia e gramática Dâw. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Antunes, Gabriel. 2004. A grammar of Sabanê: A Nambikwaran language. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Bacelar, Laércio. 2004. Gramática da língua Kanoê. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew & Brown, Dunstan. 2005. Case syncretism. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 118–121. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 169–240. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The geography of case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 479–493. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Golluscio, Lucía A., González, Hebe & Vidal, Alejandra. 2010. El Chaco como área lingüística. In Estudios de lenguas amerindias, 2: Contribuciones al estudio de las lenguas originarias de América, Zarina Estrada-Fernández & Ramón Arzápalo Marín (eds), 85–132. Hermosillo, Sonora: Editorial Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Crevels, Mily. 2012. Itonama. In Las lenguas de Bolivia, Tomo II: Amazonía, Mily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds), 233–394. La Paz: Plural.Google Scholar
Crevels, Mily & van der Voort, Hein. 2008. The Guaporé-Mamoré region as a linguistic area. In From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 90], Pieter Muysken (ed.) 151–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crowell, Thomas H. 1979. A grammar of Bororo. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy. 1997. A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquier): An indigenous language of south-western Colombia. PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Danielsen, Swintha 2007. Baure: An Arawak Language of Bolivia. Leiden: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond D. 1985. Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology. Arlington TX: SIL and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
1999. Carib. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 23–64.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Connie. 2002. Complex predicates in Tsafiki. PhD disssertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Diehl, Lon 1975. Space case: Some principles and their implications concerning linear ordering in natural language. SIL working papers, University of Dakota. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2004. The Jarawara Language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. Introduction. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–22.Google Scholar
Duff-Trip, Martha. 1997. Gramática del idioma yanesha’ (amuesha). Lima: Ministerio de Educación; Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Eberhard, David. 2009. Mamaindê Grammar: A Northern Nambikwara Language and its Cultural Context. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. 2008. A Grammar of Hup. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Caleb. 2006. Gestural, perceptual, and conceptual patterns in Karitiana. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Everett, Dan & Barbara Kern. 1997. Wari’: The Pacaas Novos Language of Western Brazil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Facundes, Sidney. 2000. The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Faust, Norma & Loos, Eugene. 2002. Gramática del idioma yaminahua. Lima: SIL.Google Scholar
Fernández-Garay, Ana. 1998. El Tehuelche: Una lengua en vías de extinción. Valdivia: Andros Lta.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Garay, Ana. 2004. Diccionario Tehuelche Español/Índice Español-Tehuelche. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Fleck, David William. 2003. A Grammar of Matsés. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Frank, Paul. 1985. A grammar of Ika. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Gabas Jr., Nilson. 1999. A grammar of Karo, Tupi (Brazil). PhD dissertation, University of California at Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Galucio, Ana Vilacy. 2001. The morphosyntax of Mekens. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 1986. The development of subordinators from postpositions in Bodic languages. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder (eds), 387–400. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society, University of California.Google Scholar
van Gijn, Rik. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
. 2014. Subordination strategies in South America: Nominalization. In The Native Languages of South America: Origins, Development, Typology, Loretta O’Connor & Pieter Muysken (eds), 274–297. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Morphological synthesis in the Guaporé-Mamoré. A contact feature? Linguistic Discovery 13(2): 96–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gijn, Rik, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken 2011. Subordination strategies in South America: An overview. In Subordination in Native South American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1998. On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Linguistic studies in the Cariban family. In The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide, Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds), 441–494. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Girón, Jesús Mario. 2008. Una gramática del Wã́nsöjöt (Puinave). PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
González, Hebe 2005. A grammar of Tapiete (Tupi-Guaraní). PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Goodwin-Gómez, Gale. 1990. The Shirina dialect of Yanam (northern Brazil). PhD dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Grondona, Verónica. 1998. A grammar of Mocoví. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine. 2008. A Grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine & Rose, Françoise. 2010. Sociative causative markers in South American languages: A possible areal feature. In Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale: Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, Franck Floricic (ed.), 383–402. Charenton-le-Pont: ENS ÉditionsGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Introduction to argument-encoding systems in Bolivian Amazonian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 77(4): 459–468 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guirardello, Raquel. 1999. A reference grammar of Trumai. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Hardman, Martha J. 2001. Aymara. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the Languages of the World. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2006. A grammar of Movima. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2008. Grammaticalization of cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 458–469. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2008. Case and contact linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 494–504. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jung, Ingrid. 2008. Gramática del páez o nasa yuwe: Descripción de una lengua indígena de Colombia. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
van de Kerke, Simon. 2009. Leko. In Las lenguas de Bolivia, Tomo I: Ámbito andino, Mily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds), 287–332. La Paz: Plural.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2006. Case systems in a diachronic perspective: A typological sketch. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 23–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The evolution of case systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 439–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1987b. Nouns and verbs. Language 63: 53–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire & Muysken, Pieter. 1988. Mixed Categories: Nominalizations in Quechua. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Loos, Eugene. 1999. Pano. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 227–250.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej. 2006. Constraining nominalization: Form/function competition. Linguistics 44 (5): 973–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4): 829–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Michael & Morse, Nancy L. 1999. Cubeo Grammar. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B. 2009. Typology of ergativity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 480–508 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meira, Sérgio. 1999. A grammar of Tiriyó. PhD dissertation, Rice University.Google Scholar
Miller, Marion. 1999. Desano Grammar. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Charles. 1999. A Reference Grammar of the Northern Embera Languages. Arlington TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2003. Diversity and stability in language. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds). Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nonato, Rafael. 2008. Ainore Boe egore: Um estudo descritivo da língua bororo. MA thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Olawsky, Knut. 2006. A Grammar of Urarina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overall, Simon. 2007. A grammar of Aguaruna. PhD dissertation, LaTrobe University.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris. 1985. Aspects of the Grammar of Yagua: A Typological Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas & Payne, Doris. 2013. A Typological Grammar of Panare: A Cariban Language of Venezuela. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Popjes, Jack & Popjes, Josephine. 1986. Canela-Krahô. In Handbook of Amazonian Languages Vol. 1, Desmond C. Derbyshire & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 128–199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. 1999. Macro-Jê. In The Amazonian Languages, Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 165–206.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Aryon D. & Cabral, Ana Suelly Arruda Câmara. 2012. Tupían. In The Indigenous Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide, Lyle Campbell & Verónica Grondona (eds), 495–574. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero-Figeroa, Andrés. 1997. A Reference Grammar of Warao. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Rose, Françoise. 2011. Grammaire de l’Émérillon Teko: Une langue Tupí-Guaraní de Guyane Française. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette. 2004. A Grammar of Mosetén. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2005. The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática do Kamiurá: Língua Tupi-Guarani do Alto Xingu. São Paolo: UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Silva, Leia. 2011. Morphosyntaxe du Rikbaktsa. PhD dissertation, Université Denis Diderot, Paris 7.Google Scholar
Smeets, Ineke. 2008. A Grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina. 2005. Comitatives and instrumentals. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 214–217. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. On Comitatives and Related Categories: A Typological Study with Special Focus on the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Storto, Luciana R. 1999. Aspects of a Karitiana grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Storto, Luciana. 2011. Subordination in Karitiana. Amerindia 35: 219–236.Google Scholar
Terraza, Jimena. 2009. Gramática del Wichí: Fonología y morfosintaxis. PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
Thiesen, Wesley & Weber, David. 2012. A Grammar of Bora with Special Attention to Tone. Dallas TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah & Kaufmann, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Torero, Alfredo. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e historia. Lima: Editorial Horizonte/IFEA.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Vallejos, Rosa. 2010. A grammar of Kokama-Kokamilla. PhD dissertation, University of OregonGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Alejandra. 2001. Pilagá grammar (Guaykuruan family, Argentina). PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
van der Voort, Hein. 2004. A Grammar of Kwaza. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine. 2012. A grammar of Ese Ejja, a Takanan language of the Bolvian Amazon. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Weber, David. 1989. A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York NY: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Wise, Mary Ruth. 2002. Applicative affixes in Peruvian Amazonian languages. In Current Studies on South American Languages, Milly Crevels, Simon van de Kerke, Sergio Meira & Hein van der Voort (eds), 329–344. Leiden: CNWS.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. PhD dissertation, LaTrobe University.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Olguín Martínez, Jesús & Manuel Peregrina Llanes
2023. ‘Without V-ing’ clauses: clausal negative concomitance in typological perspective. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Olguín Martínez, Jesús & Alonso Vásquez-Aguilar
2022. The contribution of amazonian languages to the typology of purpose clauses. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 22 ► pp. e022018 ff. DOI logo
Gipper, Sonja & Foong Ha Yap
2019. Chapter 9. Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré. In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Zariquiey, Roberto
2019. Chapter 15. Nominalization and switch-reference in Iskonawa (Panoan, Peru). In Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language, 124], ► pp. 537 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.