Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 363–390

Chapter 9
Life of =ti: Use and grammaticalization of a clausal nominalizer in Yurakaré

| University of Cologne | Australian National University
| Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Chinese University of Hong KongShenzhen
In this paper, we investigate the uses of the clausal nominalizer =ti in Yurakaré, a linguistic isolate spoken in Bolivia. Clauses nominalized with =ti can serve a variety of functions: filling an argument position, relativization, forming the complement of a complement-taking verb, and expressing adverbial modification. On the basis of synchronic spoken corpus data, we propose a grammaticalization path for =ti. We argue that its most plausible source is the demonstrative ati, thus suggesting that =ti is a demonstrative-based nominalizer. Further, we show that =ti has developed a range of insubordinate uses, indicating ‘intersubjective commitment’. We propose that from there, =ti is currently on its way toward becoming a stance marker, contrasting with other clause-final enclitics of Yurakaré.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Background on Yurakaré
    • 1.2Data
  • 2.Subordinating uses of =ti
    • 2.1=ti-marked clauses with argument function
    • 2.2=ti-marked clauses with relativizing function
    • 2.3=ti-marked clauses with complement function
    • 2.4=ti-marked clauses with adverbial function
    • 2.5Connection between subordinating uses
  • 3.The demonstrative ati as a possible source for =ti
  • 4.Insubordination of =ti
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.09gip
References (56)
References
Ahn, Mikyung & Yap, Foong Ha. 2014. On the diachronic development of Korean ‘say’ evidentials and their extended pragmatic functions. Diachronica 31(3): 299–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Evidentiality in interaction: A pragmatic analysis of Korean hearsay evidentials. Studies in Language 39(1): 46–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adachi, Mayumi. 2014. Demonstratives as sentence final particles in Vietnamese. Paper presented at the Second American Pragmatics Conference, UCLA, 17 October.Google Scholar
Clifton, Charles Jr. & Frazier, Lyn. 2010. Imperfect ellipsis: Antecedents beyond syntax? Syntax 13(4): 279–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Lexical nominalization. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 349–398. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1996. Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because . Pragmatics 6(3): 389–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2019. Nominalizations in diachronic cross-linguistic perspective. In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Eloranta, Rita. 2019. Lexical and grammatical nominalization in Mochica. In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2011. Nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. In Yap, Grunow-Hårsta & Wrona (eds), 163–193.
van Gijn, Rik. 2006. A grammar of Yurakaré. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2011. Semantic and grammatical integration in Yurakaré subordination. In Subordination in Native South American Languages [Typological Studies in Language 97], Rik van Gijn, Katharina Haude & Pieter Muysken (eds), 169–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Subordination strategies in South America: Nominalization. In The Native Languages of South America, Loretta O’Connor & Pieter Muysken (eds), 274–296. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Case markers as subordinators in South American indigenous languages. In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
van Gijn, Rik, Hirtzel, Vincent & Gipper, Sonja. 2011. The Yurakaré Archive. Online language documentation, DobeS Archive, MPI Nijmegen. < [URL] > Google Scholar
Gipper, Sonja. 2017. Pre-semantic pragmatics encoded: A non-spatial account of Yurakaré demonstratives. Journal of Pragmatics 120: 122–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization, [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko. 2006. From a Subordinate Clause to an Independent Clause: A History of English because-clause and Japanese kara-clause. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Hirtzel, Vincent. 2010. Le maître à deux têtes: Enquête sur le rapport à soi d’une population d’Amazonie bolivienne, les Yuracaré. PhD dissertation, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
Kratochvíl, Frantisek. 2011. Discourse-structuring functions of Abui demonstratives. In Yap, Grunow-Hårsta & Wrona (eds), 757–788.
Kurzon, Dennis. 1995. The right of silence: A socio-pragmatic model of interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 23: 55–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Machado, Adriana. 2019. Nominalization and its pervasiveness in Xavante. In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Malchukov, Andrej. 2004. Nominalization/Verbalization: Constraining a Typology of Transcategorial Operations [Lincom Studies in Language Typology 8]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
. 2006. Constraining nominalization: Function/form competition. Linguistics 44(5): 973–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morey, Stephen. 2011. Nominalization in Numhpuk Singpho. In Yap, Grunow-Hårsta & Wrona (eds), 289–311.
Nagaya, Naonori. 2011. Rise and fall of referentiality: Articles of Philippine languages. In Yap, Grunow-Hårsta & Wrona (eds), 589–626.
. 2014. Notes on stand-alone yung-nominalizations in Tagalog. Language and Linguistics 35: 177–186.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1997. Versatile nominalizations. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givon, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Nominalization in Bodic languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], Maria José Lopez-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), in collaboration with Teresa Fanego, 219–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Aspects of the historical development of nominalizers in the Tamangic languages. In Yap, Grunow-Hårsta & Wrona (eds), 195–214.
Ohori, Toshio. 1995. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2014. Analogy-driven grammaticalization: A case of grammaticalization of sentence-final markers from concomitance-connectives. Linguistic Research 31(3): 591–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Roque, Lila, Gawne, Lauren, Hoenigman, Darja, Miller, Julia Colleen, Rumsey, Alan, Spronck, Stef, Carroll, Alice & Evans, Nicholas. 2012. Getting the story straight: Language fieldwork using a narrative problem-solving task. Language Documentation & Conservation 6: 135–174.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette & San Roque, Lila. 2011. Demonstratives and non-embedded nominalisations in three Papuan languages of the Timor-Alor-Pantar family. Studies in Language 35(2): 380–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J. 1991. Paratactic because . Journal of Pragmatics 16: 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2013. What can Japanese dialects tell us about the function and development of the nominalization particle no? In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 20, Bjarke Frellesvig & Peter Sells (eds), 429–451. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2019. What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization. In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2015. Two types of conditionals and two different grammaticalization paths. In Sentence Final Particles, (ed.) Hencal, Sylvie, 157–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2008. The grammaticalization of clausal nominalizers in Burmese. In Rethinking Grammaticalization [Typlogical Studies in Language 76], Maria José Lopez-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), in collaboration with Teresa Fanego, 265–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sung, Li-May. 2011. Clausal nominalization in Budai Rukai. In Yap, Grunow-Hårsta & Wrona (eds), 523–559.
Tanangkingsing, Michael. (2012). Demonstratives as stance markers: An analysis of non-referential and pragmatic uses of deictic expressions in Cebuano. Ms, National Taipei University of Technology.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Heine, Bernd. 1991. Introduction. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, II: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Valle, Daniel & Zariquiey, Roberto. 2019. Clausal nominalization in Kakataibo (Panoan). In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Van linden, An. 2019. Nominalization in Harakmbut. In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Wai, Brian & Yap, Foong Ha. 2014. “Better left unsaid”: The role of silence and ellipsis in political discourse. Ms, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
Watters, David. 2008. Nominalization in the Kiranti and Central Himalayish languages of Nepal. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2): 1–43.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Choi, Pik-ling & Cheung, Kam Siu. 2010. De-lexicalizing di3: How a Chinese locative noun has evolved into an attitudinal nominalizer. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse, in collaboration with Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 63–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Yi Deng & Marco Caboara. 2017. Attitudinal nominalizer(s) in Chinese: Evidence of recursive grammaticalization and pragmaticization. Lingua 200: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Grunow-Hårsta, Karen. 2010. Non-referential uses of nominalization constructions: Asian perspectives. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(12): 1154–1175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Grunow-Hårsta, Karen & Wrona, Janick (eds). 2011. Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language96]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Meili Marie. 2010. Grammaticalization of the demonstrative ‘isa:a’in Saisiyat. Paper presented at theWorkshop on Pragmatic Markers in Asian Languages: A pre-conference workshop of The 4th Conference on Language, Discourse and Cognition, National Taiwan University, 30 April.
. 2014. Demonstrative as a discourse connective device: A case study of ‘isa:a’ in Saisiyat. Ms, National Hsinchu University of Education, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Zariquiey, Roberto. 2019. Nominalization and switch-reference in Iskonawa (Panoan, Peru). In Zariquiey, Shibatani & Fleck (eds). (this volume)
Zariquiey, Roberto, Shibatani, Masayoshi & Fleck, David W. (eds). 2019. Nominalization in Languages of the Americas [Typological Studies in Language 124]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar