Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 391–417

Chapter 10
The rise of the nominalizations

The case of the grammaticalization of clause types in Ecuadorian Siona

| University of Leiden
The nominalization of verbs in Ecuadorian Siona is carried out by nominal classifiers. The major types of nominalization in the language are event nominalization and subject nominalization. Object nominalization needs additional morphology. When verbs are not nominalized they carry portmanteau morphology that marks the categories of subject, clause type (assertive, reportative, interrogative, and dependent clauses) and tense. A peculiarity of the system is that the reportative, interrogative and dependent clause subject paradigms show a remarkable resemblance with nominal classifiers in the language. This paper proposes that the reportative forms grammaticalized from a reported speech construction through clause union, the interrogative forms grammaticalized from a (pseudo-)cleft construction through insubordination and the dependent clause forms developed from nominalizations that were used adverbially.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Nominalization in Ecuadorian Siona
    • 2.1The role of nominal classifiers
    • 2.2Types of nominalizations
    • 2.3Functions of nominalizations
  • 3.Subject agreement morphology
    • 3.1Clause type paradigms
      • 3.1.1Assertive clauses
      • 3.1.2Non-assertive clauses
      • 3.1.3Dependent clauses
    • 3.2Tense and subject agreement morphology
  • 4.The source of the subject agreement suffixes
  • 5.Reconstructing the non-assertive and dependent constructions
    • 5.1The origin of the reportative
    • 5.2The origin of the interrogative
    • 5.3The origin of the dependent verb marking
  • 6.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.10bru
References (42)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barnes, Janet. 1984. The evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50(3): 255–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy & Thangjam Hindustani Devi. 2004. Why cleft? In SALA XXIII Procedings, Doug Bigham, Mark Brown, Q Wan Kim & Sadia Rahman (eds), 1–10. Stanford CA: CSLI. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Bruil, Martine. 2014. Clause-typing and Evidentiality in Ecuadorian Siona. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
. 2015. When evidentials are not evidentials: The case of the Ecuadorian Siona reportative. Linguistic Typology 19(3): 385–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 2000. Lingüística aimara. Cuzco: Centro “Bartolomé de Las Casas”.Google Scholar
Chacón, Thiago Costa. 2012. The phonology and morphology of Kubeo: The documentation, theory, and description of an Amazonian language. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai'i.Google Scholar
. 2014. A revised proposal of Proto-Tukanoan and Tukanoan family classification. International Journal of American Linguistics 80(3): 275–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua [Lingua Descriptive Series 5]. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordition and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2002. The semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gomez-Imbert, Elsa. 1997. Morphologie et phonologie Barasana: Approche non-linéaire. PhD dissertation, Unversité de Paris 8.Google Scholar
. 2004. Fonología de dos idiomas tukano del Piraparaná: Barasana y Tatuyo. Amerindia 29: 43–80.Google Scholar
. 2011. Le Tatuyo. In Dictionnaire de langues, Emilio Bonvini, Joëlle Busuttil & Alain Peyraube (eds), 1548–1555. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Harris, Martin. 1978. The Evolution of French Syntax: A Comparative Approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Idiatov, Dmitry & van der Auwera, Johan. 2004. Nominalization as a question formation strategy in Tucanoan. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 15: 9–24.Google Scholar
. 2008. From nominalizations to questions – Evidence from Tucanoan. Jezikoslovlje 1(1–2): 35–51.Google Scholar
Jones, Wendell H. & Jones, Pamela Simmons. 1991. Barasano Syntax [Studies in the Languages of Colombia 2]. Dallas TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Kinch, Rodney A. & Kinch, Pamela G. 2000. El yurutí. In Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visíon descriptiva, María Stella González de Pérez & María Luisa Rodríguez de Montes (eds), 469–488. Santafé de Bogotá: Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter. 2007. Speech act distinctions in grammar. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 276–324. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malone, Terrell. 1988. The origin and development of Tuyuca evidentials. International Journal of American Linguistics 54(2): 119–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malone, Terrell & Barnes, Janet. 2000. El tuyuca. In Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: una visíon descriptiva, María Stella González de Pérez & María Luisa Rodríguez de Montes (eds), 437–452. Santafé de Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa, Davis, Henry & Rullmann, Hotze. 2007. Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St'át'imcets. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7(1): 201–254.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev D. 2012a. Máíjìkì finite verbal inflectional paradigms. Ms, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
2012b. Tone in Máíhĩ̀kì. Ms, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Miller, Marion. 1999. Desano Grammar [Studies in the Languages of Colombia 6]. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Overall, Simon E. 2011. Clause-chaining and nominalisations in Aguaruna (Jivaroan). Paper presented at the SLE, Universidad de la Rioja, Logroño.Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler Roy Gösta. 2010. Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Gitksan at the semantics-pragmatics interface. PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Speech acts distinctions in syntax. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 155–196. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Anne. 2012. Speaker confidence and speculation. The epistemic dichotomy in the verb inflection in Secoya. Paper presented at the Friday Afternoon Lectures, Leiden University.Google Scholar
da Silva, Wilson. 2012. A descriptive grammar of Desano. PhD dissertation, University of Utah.Google Scholar
Smothermon, Jeffrey R., Smothermon, Josephine H. & Frank, Paul Stephen. 1995. Bosquejo del Macuna. Santafé de Bogotá: Editorial Alberto Lleras Camargo.Google Scholar
Stenzel, Kristine. 2013. A Reference Grammar of Kotiria (Wanano). Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sung, Li-May. 2011. Clausal nominalization in Budai Rukai. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perpsectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 523–559. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vallejos, Rosa. 2015. On the fuzzy bounderies between complex predicates and multiclause constructions: The case of Secoya. Paper presented at the Western Tukanoan Workshop, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Velie, Daniel & Velie, Virginia. 1981. Vocabulario Orejón. Lima: Ministerio de Educación, Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Waldie, Ryan J., Peterson, Tyler Roy Gösta, Rullmann, Hotze & Mackie, Sott. 2009. Evidentials as epistemic modals or speech act operators: Testing the tests. Paper presented at the Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas 13, Purdue University. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Wheeler, Alva. 1987. Gantëya Bain, el pueble siona del río Putumayo, Colombia, Tomo I. Lomalinda: Editorial Townsend.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Wang, Jiao. 2011. From light noun to nominalizer and more: The grammaticalization of zhe and suo in Old and Middle Chinese. In Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perpsectives [Typological Studies in Language 96], Foong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds), 61–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Krasnoukhova, Olga, Johan van der Auwera & Sietze Norder
2023. Standard negation: the curious case of South America. Linguistic Typology 27:3 ► pp. 629 ff. DOI logo
Bruil, Martine
2018. The development of the portmanteau verbal morphology in Ecuadorian Siona. Journal of Historical Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.