Cover not available
Part of
Nominalization in Languages of the Americas
Edited by Roberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani and David W. Fleck
[Typological Studies in Language 124] 2019
► pp. 591–624

Chapter 17
Nominalization and its pervasiveness in Xavante

| Independent Scholar
The aim of this presentation is to show the ubiquitous character of nominalizations in Xavante, a Jê language spoken in central Brazil by approximately 15,000 speakers. After a brief presentation of background information, we will give a synchronic description of lexical and grammatical nominalizations. The section devoted to grammatical nominalization points out the hybrid nature of constituents we are inclined to call ‘nominalized clauses’: it offers an analysis of their internal (clausal) structure and their syntactic (nominal) behaviour. A final section presents a diachronic hypothesis involving several contexts where nominalizations can be argued to have operated at the clause level in a previous state of the language.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Background information
    • 1.1Nouns
      • 1.1.1Noun classes
      • 1.1.2Noun stems
    • 1.2Verbs
      • 1.2.1Verb classes
      • 1.2.2Verb stems
    • 1.3Parallels between nouns and verbs
      • 1.3.1Clitics and particles
      • 1.3.2Predicate function
      • 1.3.3Valency
  • 2.Nominalizations
    • 2.1Lexical nominalizations
      • 2.1.1‘Agent’ deverbal nouns
      • 2.1.2‘Non-agent’ deverbal nouns
      • 2.1.3‘Action’ deverbal nouns
    • 2.2Grammatical nominalization
      • 2.2.1Clause nominalization
        • 2.2.1.1Internal properties
        • 2.2.1.2External properties
      • 2.2.2Nominalization and discourse
        • 2.2.2.1Insubordination
        • 2.2.2.2Re-finitization
  • 3.Diachronic hypothesis
    • 3.1Stative verbs
    • 3.2Negation
    • 3.3Aspect
  • Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.17est
References (29)
References
Alves, Flávia de Castro. 2004. O Timbira falado pelos Canela Apãniekrá: Uma contribuição aos estudos da morfossintaxe de uma língua Jê. PhD dissertation, UNICAMP.Google Scholar
. 2010. Evolution of alignment in Timbira. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(4): 439–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word-formation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Eithne B. 2011. Theticity in Trio (Cariban). International Journal of American Linguistics 77(1): 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G. & Hale, Ken. 1988. Relational preverbs in some languages of the Americas: Typological and historical perspectives. Language 64: 312–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Langage 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Estevam, Adriana Machado. 2015. Expressando conceitos de qualidade em Xavante: Adjetivos ou verbos? Moara 43: 141–165.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike & Alves, Flávia de Castro. To appear. Reconstructing the source of nominative-absolutive alignment in two Amazonian language families. In Reconstructing Syntax: Cognates and Directionality [Brill Series in Historical Linguistics], Eugenio Luján, Jóhanna Barðdal & Spike Gildea (eds). Leiden: Brill.
Givón, T. 2016. Nominalization and re-finitization. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 271–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D. 2010. Understanding Morphology. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment. Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9(2): 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Launey, Michel. 1986. Catégories et opérations dans la grammaire nahuatl. Thèse d’État, Université Paris IV.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 1997. Yukagir focus in a typological perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 457–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Ruth & Mitchell, Valerie. 2003. Aspectos da língua xavante. Cuiabá: Publicações da SIL.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Christiane C. 2005. The language of the Apinajé people of Central Brazil. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc. 2005. Posse em katukína e valência dos nomes. In Novos estudos sobre línguas indígenas, Aryon Rodrigues & Ana Suelly A. C. Cabral (eds), 177–202. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
. 2006. The primacy and fate of predicativity in Tupi-Guarani. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, Ximena Lois & Valentina Vapnarsky (eds), 249–287. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2016. The role of nominalization in theticity. A Sikuani contribution. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 205–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Eduardo Rivail. 2002. O marcador de posse alienável em Karirí: Um morfema Macro-Jê revisitado. LIAMES 2: 31–48.Google Scholar
Salanova, Andrés. 2007. Nominalizations and aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2008. Uma análise unificada das construções ergativas em Mẽbengokre. Amérindia 32: 109–134.Google Scholar
. 2013. Event nominals in Mẽbengokre and the theory of nominalizations. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 58(2): 267–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25: 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Souza Filho, Sinval Martins de. 2007. Aspectos morfossintáticos da língua Akwẽ-Xerente (Jê). PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal de Goiás.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2009. Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t: The case of relativization. In T. Givón and Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), Syntactic complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution, 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar