Cover not available
Part of
Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity
Edited by Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández and Claudine Chamoreau
[Typological Studies in Language 126] 2019
► pp. 13–26

Switch-reference in Kobon and Haruai

Areal influences within Highland New Guinea

| SIL International
| University of California Santa Barbara | Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Kobon and Haruai are two neighboring unrelated Papuan languages with similar syntactic typology. Within the overall space of cross-linguistic variation, their switch-reference systems are remarkably similar, though not identical, for instance strictly tracking the referent of the grammatical subject. Kobon uses same-subject marking when the referent of the controller is properly included in that of the target, and also in the inverse configuration when both noun phrases are of the same grammatical person; different-subject marking is only used when the referent of the target is properly included in that of the controller and the two noun phrases are of different persons. Haruai has essentially the same system, but allows more variation to express subjective assessment of degrees of coreferentiality.
Keywords: switch-reference, Papuan languages, experiencer construction, overlapping reference, language contact
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Switch-reference in Kobon and Haruai: The basics
    • 2.1Switch-reference morphology in Kobon and Haruai
  • 3.Switch-reference in Kobon and Haruai: What is tracked?
  • 4.Switch-reference in Kobon and Haruai: Overlapping reference
    • 4.1Overlapping reference in Kobon
    • 4.2Overlapping reference in Haruai
  • 5.Conclusion and prospects
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.126.01dav
References (11)
References
Bhatia, Kuldeep, Carol Jenkins, , Prasad Madhuri, George Koki & Julie Lomange. 1989. Immunogenetic studies of two recently contacted populations from Papua New Guinea. Human Biology 61: 45–64.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Haruai verb structure and language classification in the Upper Yuat. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 17(1–2): 140–160.Google Scholar
. 1998. Switch reference in Haruai: Grammar and discourse. In Productivity and Creativity: Studies in General and Descriptive Linguistics in Honor of E.M. Uhlenbeck [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 116], Marc Janse (ed.), 421–432. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Language contact, lexical borrowing, and semantic fields. In Languages in Contact [Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 28], Dicky Gilbers, John Nerbonne & Jos Schaeken (eds), 73–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2016. Finiteness in Haruai. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language 113], Claudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds), 71–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Daniels, Don. 2015. A Reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, Lexicon, and Morphosyntax. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Davies, John. 1981. Kobon [Lingua Descriptive Studies 3]. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Carol L. 1987. Medical anthropology in the Western Schrader Range, Papua New Guinea. National Geographic Research 3: 412–430.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina (ed.). 2007. Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Reesink, Ger P. 1983. Switch reference and topicality hierarchies. Studies in Language 7(2): 215–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1997. Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: a preliminary survey. In Papers in Papuan Linguistics No 3 [Pacific Linguistics A-87], Andrew Pawley (ed.), 101–241. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar