Cover not available
Part of
Diverse Scenarios of Syntactic Complexity
Edited by Albert Álvarez González, Zarina Estrada-Fernández and Claudine Chamoreau
[Typological Studies in Language 126] 2019
► pp. 27–49

Models of grammar and the outcomes of long-term language contact

Language mixing in Dakkhini

| Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU
| University of Delhi & University of Hyderabad (formerly)

In this paper, we lay the groundwork for an explanation of the language mixing outcomes witnessed in the grammar of contemporary Dakkhini, which is the result of long-term diachronic contact between Hindi/Urdu and Telugu. We argue that an Exoskeletal Frame Model is well suited to account both for Dakkhini-type contact outcomes, and for “online” code-switching outcomes. The key element of our model is the assumption of a distinction between an underlying abstract syntactic skeleton and the instantiation of that skeleton by functional and lexical exponents. In the case of Dakkhini, we argue that the syntactic skeleton is mainly provided by Telugu, whereas both the functional and lexical exponents by and large are provided by Hindi/Urdu.

Keywords: code-switching, Dakkhini, exoskeletal frame, language contact, language mixing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theories of language mixing outcomes: The MLFM
  • 3.Dakkhini
    • 3.1Dakkhini: Basic facts
    • 3.2Dakkhini: Some examples
    • 3.3Dakkhini and the MLFM
  • 4.An exoskeletal frame model: EFM
    • 4.1The EFM is a generative competence model
    • 4.2The structure and properties of the EFM
    • 4.3How the EFM deals with CS type mixing data
  • 5.An exoskeletal EFM analysis of Dakkhini
    • 5.1Dakkhini and the EFM
    • 5.2Dakkhini and the complementizer ki
    • 5.3Dakkhini and Bol ke
    • 5.4Wider implications of our analysis
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.126.02afa
References
Åfarli, Tor A
2007 Do verbs have argument structure? In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], Eric Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giorgos Spathas (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A.
2015a A syntactic model for the analysis of language mixing phenomena: American Norwegian and beyond. In Moribund Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, B. Richard Page & Michael T. Putnam (eds), 12–33. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A
2015b Hybrid verb forms in American Norwegian and the analysis of the syntactic relation between the verb and its tense. In Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Acquisition, Attrition and Change [Studies in Language Variation 18], Janne Bondi Johannessen & Joseph C. Salmons (eds), 161–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Åfarli, Tor A. & Jin, Fufen
2014 Syntactic frames and single-word code-switching: A case study of Norwegian–Mandarin Chinese. In The Sociolinguistics of Grammar [Studies in Laguage Companion Series 154], Tor A. Åfarli & Brit Mæhlum (eds), 153–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Lohndal, Terje, Åfarli, Tor A. & Grimstad, Maren Berg
2015 Language mixing: A distributed morphology approach. In NELS 45: Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyildiz (eds), 25–38. Scotts Valley CA: Create Space Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Arora, Harbir
2004 Syntactic Convergence: The Case of Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu. Delhi: University of Delhi, Publication Division.Google Scholar
Arora, Harbir & Subbarao, Karumuri V
1989 Convergence and syntactic reanalysis: The case of so in Dakkhini. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Arora, Harbir, & Subbarao, Karumuri V
2004 Syntactic change and convergence. In Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds), 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter
2003 Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In The Mixed Language Debate. Theoretical and Empirical Advances, Yaron Matras & Peter Bakker (eds), 107–150. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter & Muysken, Pieter
1995 Mixed languages and language intertwining. In Pidgin and Creoles. An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], Jacques Arends, Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds), 41–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter & Papen, Robert A
1997 Michif: A mixed language based on Cree and French. In Contact Languages. A Wider Perspective [Creole Language Library 17], Sarah G. Thomason (ed.), 295–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentahila, Abdelali
1995 Review of Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in code switching by Carol Myers-Scotton. Language 71: 135–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2003 Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: Syntactic projections and the lexicon. In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, John Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds), 31–67. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2005a Structuring Sense: In Name Only, Vol. I. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005b Structuring Sense: The Normal Course of Events, Vol. II. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Structuring Sense: Taking Form, Vol. III. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boussafara-Omar, Naima
2003 Revisiting Arabic diglossic switching in light of the MLF model and its sub-models: The 4-M model and the Abstract Level model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6: 33–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Brian Hok-Shing
2007 Code-switching, word order and the lexical/functional category distinction. Lingua 118: 777–809. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2007 Distributed morphology and the syntax – morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
González-Vilbazo, Kay & López, Luis
2011 Some properties of light verbs in code-switching. Lingua 121: 832–850. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimstad, Maren B., Lohndal, Terje & Åfarli, Tor A.
2014 Language mixing and Exoskeletal Theory: A case study of word-internal mixing in American Norwegian. Nordlyd 41: 213–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimstad, Maren B., Riksem, Brita Ramsevik, Åfarli, Tor A. & Lohndal, Terje
2014 The inadequacy of feature-based lexicalist theories: A case-study of American Norwegian. Paper presented at The Fifth Annual Workshop on Immigrant Languages in the Americas, UCLA, Los Angeles, 17–19 October.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvian Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & S. Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1999 Distributed morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1953  The Norwegian Language in America. A Study in Bilingual Behavior, Vol. I & II. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
1996 Event Semantics and Verb Frame Alternations. PhD dissertation [TILDIL Dissertation Series], Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Jake, Janice, Myers-Scotton, Carol & Gross, Steven
2002 Making a minimalist approach to codeswitching work: Adding the Matrix Language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5: 69–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamwangamalu, Nkonko M.
1997 Language contact, code-switching, and I-languages: Evidence from Africa. South African Journal of Linguistics 15: 45–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khan, Masud Husain
1974 Dakhni-Urdu. In History of Medieval Deccan ( 1295-1724 ), Vol. II, Haroon K. Sherwani & P. M. Joshi (eds), 17–34. Hyderabad: The Government of Andhra Pradesh.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje
2012 Without specifiers. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
2014 Phrase Structure and Argument Structure: A Case Study of the Syntax – Semantics Interface. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacSwan, Jeff
1999  A Minimalist Approach to Intra-sentential Code-switching. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2000 The architecture of the bilingual faculty: Evidence from intrasentential code switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Codeswitching and generative grammar: A critique of the MLF model and some remarks on ‘modified minimalism’. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Generative approaches to code-switching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-Switching, Barbara E. Bullock & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 323–350. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Code-switching and grammatical theory. In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, Tej K. Bhatia & William C. Ritchie (eds), 309–335. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mahootian, Shahrzad
1993 A Null Theory of Code-switching. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2., Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark & Alexander Williams (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
2013 Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohiddin, S. Khader
1980 Dakhani Urdu. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Mustafa, Khateeb S.
2000 A Descriptive Grammar of Dhakkini. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
2000 Bilingual Speech. A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2008  Functional Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Root/affix asymmetries in contact and transfer: Case studies from the Andes. International Journal of Bilingualism 16: 22–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol
1993 Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2002 Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nygård Mari
2013 Discourse ellipses in spontaneously spoken Norwegian: Clausal architecture and licensing conditions. PhD dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Riksem, Brita Ramsevik
2018 Language mixing in American Norwegian noun phrases, PhD dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Subbarao, Karumuri V.
2012 South Asian Languages. A Syntactic Typology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Subbarao, Karumuri V. & Arora, Harbir
1988 On extreme convergence: The case of Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu. In Language Change and Language Variation, A. Mukherjee (ed.), 105–122. Osmania University, Hyderabad. (Also in: Indian Linguistics 49, 1988).Google Scholar
2009 The conjunctive participle in Dakkhini Hindi-Urdu: Making the best of both worlds. Indian Linguistics 70: 359–386.Google Scholar
Velupillai, Viveka
2015 Pidgins, Creoles & Mixed Languages. An Introduction [Creole Language Library 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Riksem, Brita Ramsevik, Maren Berg Grimstad, Terje Lohndal & Tor A. Åfarli
2019. Language mixing within verbs and nouns in American Norwegian. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Norwegian Discourse Ellipsis [Studies in Germanic Linguistics, 2], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.