Cover not available
Part of
The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 1–8

Chapter 1
Introduction

| University of California, Santa Barbara
| University of Alberta
Published online: 15 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.01tho
References (52)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko & Clancy, Patricia M. 1993. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean: Evidence from the emergence of conditionals. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2: 177–192.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 2007. Deontic conditionals and desirability: Structure and socialization in child-directed speech. In Festschrift for Noriko Akatsuka, Susumu Kuno, Seiichi Makino & Susan Strauss (eds), 1–11. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Akatsuka, Noriko & Strauss, Susan. 1997. Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. In Directions in Functional Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2007. Grammar in time: The non-restrictive ‘which’-clause as an interactional resource. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 55: 51–82.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. On assessing situations and events in conversation: Extraposition and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10(4): 443–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini, Ewing, Michael C. & Manns, Howard. 2018. Style and Intersubjectivity in Youth Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Noun phrase structure. In Complex Constructions, Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 2d edn, Vol. 2, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 151–205. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2003. Searching for Structure: The Problem of Complementation in Colloquial Indonesian Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In On Conditionals Again [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 143], Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds), 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–38. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 2007. Relative clauses in English conversation: Relativizers, frequency and the notion of construction. Studies in Language 31(2): 293–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald. 1987. Tails (right-dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversation. In Getting One’s Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, Jan Nuyts & Georges de Schutter (eds), 119–129. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left Dislocation in English [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol (ed.). 2015. How Languages Work. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 97–121. New York NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne. 2000. From concessive connector to discourse marker: The use of obwohl in everyday German interaction. In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast, Bernd Kortmann & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 439–468. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001a. Syntax in the Making: The Emergence of Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1997. Discourse and the category ‘verb’ in English. Language and Communication 17(2): 93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic Society 40: 239–256.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra A. 1984. The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2001. “Sentence” in spontaneous spoken Japanese discourse. In Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, Essays in Honor of Sandra A. Thompson, Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds), 175–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2008. Clause combining and sequenced actions: The Estonian complementizer and evidential particle et . In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Laury, Ritva & Seppänen, Eeva-Leena. 2011. Syntactic and actional characteristics of Finnish etta-clauses. In Subordination in Conversation. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 69–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva. 2012. Syntactically non-integrated Finnish jos ‘if’ conditional clauses as directives. Discourse Processes 49: 213–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2015. Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversation. In Information Structuring of Spoken Language from a Crosslinguistic Perspective, M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin (eds), 149–166. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Seppänen, Eeva-Leena. 2008. Clause combining, interaction, evidentiality, participation structure and the particle-conjunction continuum. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifuntionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 153–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Edward N. 1993. The Essence of Chaos. Seattle WA: University of Washington Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun-modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame-semantic Approach [Studies in Language Companion Series 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko, Comrie, Bernard & Sells, Peter (eds). 2017. Noun-modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: Rethinking Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries [Typological Studies in Language 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim. 1995. Does spoken language have sentences? In Grammar and Meaning: Essays in Honour of Sir John Lyons, Frank R. Palmer (ed.), 116–135. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifuntionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed.), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Penry Williams, Cara. 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Comparative grammatical studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English Around the World G39], Peter Collins & Pam Peters (eds), 39–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1983. Topic as a discourse notion. In Acquisition of Conversational Competence, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 158–174. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Platt, Martha. 1979. Propositions across utterances and speakers. In Developmental Pragmatics, Elinor Ochs & Bambi B. Schieffelin (eds), 251–268. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Jones, Kimberly. 2008. Conversation and Grammar: Approaching So-called Conditionals in Japanese. In Junko Mori & Amy Ohta, eds., Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives. London: Continuum International. 21–51.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Laury, Ritva & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2019. Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units. Studies in Language 43:2Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 402–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Japanese (w)atashi/ore/boku ‘I’: They’re not just pronouns. Cognitive Linguistics 14(4): 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Fixedness in Japanese adjectives in conversation: Toward a new understanding of a lexical (part-of-speech) category. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change [Typological Studies in Language 82], Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 117–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Thompson, Sandra A. & Sasaki, Yumi. 2012. Japanese negotiation through emerging final particles in everyday talk. Discourse Processes 49(3–4): 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2010. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left- and right-dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds), 45–87. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, De Stefani, Elwys & Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie. 2015. Time and Emergence in Grammar: Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French Talk- in-interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1992. Conditionals as topics in discourse. Linguistics 30(1): 165–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena & Laury, Ritva. 2007. Complement clauses as turn continuations: The Finnish että-clause. Pragmatics 17(4): 553–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, Steven H. 1994. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos. Boston MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 1992. NP intonation units and referent identification. BLS 18: 237–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse and Grammar [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. ‘Object complements’ and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1): 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 481–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar