Part of
The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 153178
References (34)
Transcription conventions
The paper uses multimodal transcription conventions developed by Lorenza Mondada: <[URL]>
References
Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1):1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias & Keevallik, Leelo. 2014. Getting ready to move as a couple: Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture 17(2): 107–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Time in action. Current Anthropology 43: 19–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In Roots of Human Sociality, Nicholas J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 96–125. London: Berg Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. 2007. Master speakers, master gesturers: A string quartet master class. In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill [Gesture Studies 1], Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds), 147–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2005. Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica 156: 21–53.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001. Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Studies in Interactional Linguistics [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10], Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1998. Emergent grammar. In New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155–175. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Jones, Stanley E. & LeBaron, Curtis D. 2002. Research on the relationship between verbal and nonverbal communication: Emerging integrations. Journal of Communication 52: 499–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2015. How Languages Work. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. The interactional profile of a placeholder: The Estonian demonstrative see. In Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders [Typological Studies in Language 93], Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds), 139–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Pro-forms as projective devices in interaction. Discourse Processes 48(6): 404–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. In: Temporality in Interaction, A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (eds.), 309–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2017. Linking performances: The temporality of contrastive grammar. In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 54–72. Helsinki: Finnish Literary Society.Google Scholar
. 2018. What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1995. Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19: 111–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xiaoting. 2013. Language and the body in the construction of units in Mandarin face-to-face interaction. In Units of Talk – Units of Action [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25], Beatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (eds), 343–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mori, Junko & Hayashi, Makoto. 2006. The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics 27: 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsher, David. 2004. Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In Second Language Conversations, Rod Gardner & Johannes Wagner (eds), 221–245. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pajusalu, Renate. 1997. Is there an article in (spoken) Estonian? In Estonian Typological Studies II [Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 8], Mati Erelt (ed.), 146–177. Tartu: Tartu ülikooli kirjastus.Google Scholar
. 2005. Anaphoric pronouns in spoken Estonian. Crossing the paradigms. In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse [Studia Fennica Linguistica 12], Ritva Laury (ed.), 107–134. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. 1976. Nonverbal components in message sequence: Mixed syntax. In Language and Man: Anthropological Issues, William Charles McCormack & Stephen Wurm (eds), 217–227. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Sidnell, Jack. 2005. Multi-modal interaction. Semiotica 156: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen & Jordan, J. Scott (eds). 2009. Projection and anticipation in embodied communication. Discourse Processes 46: 93–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Peter. 1996. A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(3): 247–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Suzuki, Ryoko
2024. Chapter 8. Manipulating referentiality and creating phaticness. In (Non)referentiality in Conversation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 344],  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Oloff, Florence
2022. The Particle Jako (“Like”) in Spoken Czech: From Expressing Comparison to Mobilizing Affiliative Responses. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021. When Gesture “Takes Over”: Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021.  In other gestures: Multimodal iteration in cello master classes. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo
Tao, Hongyin
2020. Chapter 11. NP clustering in Mandarin conversational interaction. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 272 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.