In co-present interaction, our bodies are continuously available for sense-making. Linguists, however, have generally analyzed grammatical patterns, such as noun phrases, separately from the rest of human behavior. This chapter looks at a collection of cases in Swedish, English, and Estonian, where the speaker initiates a noun phrase but completes it with an embodied demonstration. Other participants treat this multimodal structure as complete and comprehensible. Building on earlier research on syntactic-bodily units (Keevallik 2013, 2017) this study calls into question the analytic boundary between language and the body and argues that grammatical projection cross-cuts modalities even within the assumedly robust noun phrase.
Article outline
Introduction
The data and the collection
Simple NP-initiations: An article, a demonstrative, an adjective
Article
Demonstrative
Adjective
Complex NP-initiations
Article + adjective(s)
Demonstrative + adjective
Participant orientation to a multimodal noun phrase: Collaborative completion
The paper uses multimodal transcription conventions developed by Lorenza Mondada: <[URL]>
References
Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1): 7–36.
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31(1):1–13.
Broth, Mathias & Keevallik, Leelo. 2014. Getting ready to move as a couple: Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space and Culture 17(2): 107–121.
Enfield, Nick. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. Cambridge: CUP.
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.
Goodwin, Charles. 2002. Time in action. Current Anthropology 43: 19–35.
Goodwin, Charles. 2006. Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In Roots of Human Sociality, Nicholas J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds), 96–125. London: Berg Press.
Haviland, John B.2007. Master speakers, master gesturers: A string quartet master class. In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimension of Language: Essays in Honor of David McNeill [Gesture Studies 1], Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell & Elena T. Levy (eds), 147–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2005. Joint turn construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica 156: 21–53.
Hopper, Paul. 1998. Emergent grammar. In New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155–175. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jones, Stanley E. & LeBaron, Curtis D.2002. Research on the relationship between verbal and nonverbal communication: Emerging integrations. Journal of Communication 52: 499–521.
Genetti, Carol. 2015. How Languages Work. Cambridge: CUP.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2011. Pro-forms as projective devices in interaction. Discourse Processes 48(6): 404–431.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2013. The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(1): 1–21.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2015. Coordinating the temporalities of talk and dance. In: Temporality in Interaction, A. Deppermann & S. Günthner (eds.), 309–336. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2017. Linking performances: The temporality of contrastive grammar. In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds), 54–72. Helsinki: Finnish Literary Society.
Keevallik, Leelo. 2018. What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1): 1–23.
Lerner, Gene H.1995. Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19: 111–131.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2014. The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(3): 336–366.
Mori, Junko & Hayashi, Makoto. 2006. The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics 27: 195–219.
Olsher, David. 2004. Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In Second Language Conversations, Rod Gardner & Johannes Wagner (eds), 221–245. London: Continuum.
Pajusalu, Renate. 1997. Is there an article in (spoken) Estonian? In Estonian Typological Studies II [Tartu Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 8], Mati Erelt (ed.), 146–177. Tartu: Tartu ülikooli kirjastus.
Pajusalu, Renate. 2005. Anaphoric pronouns in spoken Estonian. Crossing the paradigms. In Minimal Reference. The Use of Pronouns in Finnish and Estonian Discourse [Studia Fennica Linguistica 12], Ritva Laury (ed.), 107–134. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.
Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana. 1976. Nonverbal components in message sequence: Mixed syntax. In Language and Man: Anthropological Issues, William Charles McCormack & Stephen Wurm (eds), 217–227. The Hague: Mouton.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.