Cover not available
Part of
The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An emergent unit in interaction
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono and Sandra A. Thompson
[Typological Studies in Language 128] 2020
► pp. 179–207

Chapter 8
Nouns and noun phrases in other-initiated repair in English atypical interaction

A case study of Augmentative and Alternative Communication

 | University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
This study investigates the interaction of one American English-speaking individual who uses an Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) device, equipped with speech-generation software to talk with able-bodied participants. Other-initiated repair is common in this context, and a few studies have hinted at the importance of nouns and noun phrases, leading to questions about what role these forms play in repair sequences. The analysis shows that when a trouble source occurs inside a noun phrase, the trajectory of the repair sequence depends critically on already produced forms that help the recipient project the grammatical role of the trouble source. The analysis also supports recent research suggesting that resolving trouble in understanding (intersubjectivity) takes priority over progressivity in interaction.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • Repair actions, personnel, and sequential trajectory
    • The relevance of competing preferences for AI
    • The grammatical relationship between the trouble source and repair
  • Data and method
  • Repairing the head noun in a noun phrase
  • Repairing more complex noun phrases
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 15 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.08may
References (52)
References
Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Projection in minimalistic syntax in interaction. Discourse Processes 46: 180–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Scott & Ferguson, Alison. 2015. Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: Some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology 29(3): 315–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Steven. 2011. Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation 33(3): 261–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Steven & Wilkinson, Ray. 2004. The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 20(4): 272–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 46(5): 769–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, Fabienne H. G. & Clift, Rebecca. 2008. Unfinished turns in French conversation: Projectability, syntax and action. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1731–1752. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Sarah. 1996. Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European Perspectives, Stephen von Tetzchner & Mogens Hygum Jensen (eds), 89–100. San Diego CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Enfield, Nicholas J. 2015. Other-initiated repair across languages: Towards a typology of conversational structures. Open Linguistics 1: 96–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dionigi, Alberto & Canestrari, Carla. 2018. The role of laughter in cognitive-behavioral therapy: Case studies. Discourse Studies 20(3): 323–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1984. Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 129–151. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1997. ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, Stuart. 2012. Addressing a trouble source outside of the repair space. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 374–386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134–184. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2013. Interviewees volunteered laughter in employment interviews: A case of ‘nervous’ laughter? In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, Phillip Glenn & Elizabeth Holt (eds), 255–275. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2003. Introduction. In Conversation and Brain Damage, Charles Goodwin (ed), 3–20. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku. 2001. Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text 21(1–2): 187–219.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1337–1374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto & Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. Proffering insertable elements: A study of other-initiated repair in Japanese. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30], Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds), 293–321. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey & Sidnell, Jack. 2013. Conversational repair and human understanding: An introduction. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30], Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds), 1–40. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2004. Shared syntax: The grammar of co-constructions. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1315–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2007. Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives, Nicholas J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds), 255–280. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1987. On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In Talk and Social Organisation, Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (eds), 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 125], Gene H. Lerner (ed), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2012. Compromising progressivity: ‘No’-prefacing in Estonian. Pragmatics 22(1): 119–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. 2015a. The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b. Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1: 164–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1996. On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 238–76. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. & Kitzinger, Celia. 2010. Repair prefacing: Preparing the way for same-turn self-repair. Paper presented at the International Conference for Conversation Analysis, Mannheim, Germany.
Lilja, Niina. 2014. Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 98–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayes, Patricia & Clinkenbeard, Mary. 2015. Identifying referents in everyday conversation involving Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems. Paper presented at the 5th Annual Meeting of the Language and Social Interaction Working Group. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
. 2016. The trouble with repair in AAC Interaction. Paper presented at the 3rd Atypical Interaction Conference. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Müller, Eve & Soto, Gloria. 2002. Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 18(2): 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penn, Claire, Frankel, Tali & Wilkinson, Ray. 2015. Problems with the understandability of aphasic talk: Mentions of persons as trouble sources in interaction. Aphasiology 29(3): 291–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Lisa. 2003. Negotiating repair in aphasic conversations. In Conversation and Brain Damage, Charles Goodwin (ed.), 147–162. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Petitjean, Cécile & Cangemi, Francesco. 2016. Laughter in correction sequences in speech therapy sessions. Journal of Pragmatics 99: 17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Hepburn, Alexa. 2010. Putting aspiration into words: ‘Laugh particles’, managing descriptive trouble and modulating action. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1543–1555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saldert, Charlotta, Ferm, Ulrika & Bloch, Steven. 2014. Semantic trouble sources and their repair in conversations affected by Parkinson’s disease. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 49(6): 710–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Discourse and Syntax [Syntax and Semantics 12], Talmy Givón (ed.), 261–286. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. On the organization of sequences as a source of ‘coherence’ in talk-in-interaction. In Conversational Organization and its Development [Advances in Discourse Processes 38], Bruce Dorval (ed.), 51–77. Ablex NJ: Norwood.Google Scholar
1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2): 205–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 30], Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond & Jack Sidnell (eds), 41–70. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail & Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2006. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society 35(3): 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vöge, Monika. 2010. Local identity process in business meetings displayed through laughter in complaint sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 42(6): 1556–1576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Ray. 1995. Doing ‘being ordinary’: Aphasia as a problem of interaction. In Work in Progress 5, M. Kersner & S. Pepe (eds), 134–150. London: Department of Human Communication Sciences, University College of London.Google Scholar
. 2007. Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 542–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Conversation analysis and communication disorders. In The Handbook of Clinical Linguistics, Martin Ball & Nicole Müller (eds), 92–106. Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2016. Known-response elicitation sequences in aphasic conversation. Paper presented at the 3rd Atypical Interaction Conference. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Wilkinson, Sue & Weatherall, Ann. 2011. Insertion repair. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(1): 65–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Haakana, Markku, Salla Kurhila, Niina Lilja & Marjo Savijärvi
2021. Extending sequences of other-initiated repair in Finnish conversation. In Intersubjectivity in Action [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 326], ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.