Chapter 10
The pragmatics of ‘light nouns’ in Besemah
Perhaps the most widely discussed aspect of the NP in western Austronesian languages is the relative clause, which is described in terms of its syntactic relation to the noun it modifies. It is expressed by a ‘relativizer’ and a so-called ‘gap’ in the modifying clause that is co-referential with the head noun. One western Austronesian language that appears to be quite different in this regard is Besemah, a little-described Malayic language of southwest Sumatra. This is because constructions analogous to relative clauses in Besemah are best described as Noun Modifying Constructions (NMC) following studies of similar phenomena in other languages, most notably Japanese. Like Japanese, Besemah NMCs most often occur with a so-called ‘light’ head noun, which has a general, abstract meaning, such as ‘thing’, ‘situation’, etc. This paper shows that NMCs headed by a closed class of light nouns serve a number interactional functions, including formulating reference to discourse entities that are recognizable to participants, elaborating upon discourse entities in increments, jointly working out the identity of a referent in other-initiations of repair, and constructing story beginnings with unattached light nouns among others. I argue that the semantically-bleached nature of light nouns and the ‘loose’ (pragmatically-determined) relationship between the light head noun and modifying elements allow speakers to construct NMCs that fit local contexts and serve various interactional purposes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Light nouns and noun-modifying constructions in Besemah
- 3.Data
- 4.Noun-modifying constructions in Besemah interaction
- 4.1Referring expressions
- 4.2Unattached light nouns in NMCs
- 4.3Light nouns in equational constructions
- 4.4Light nouns in lexicalizations and fixed expressions
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (41)
References
Clift, Rebecca. 2007. Grammar in time: The non-restrictive ‘which’-clause as an interactional resource. Tech. rep. 55: 51–82.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cole, Peter & Gabriella Hermon. 2005. Subject and non-subject relativization in Indonesian. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14(1): 59–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–85.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds). 2007. Turn Continuation in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Special issue of Pragmatics 17(4).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dingemanse, Mark, Giovanni Rossi & Simeon Floyd. 2017. Place reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional affordances. Language in Society 46(2): 129–158. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane Anne Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ewing, Michael C. 1991. The discourse function of relative clauses in Indonesian. Berkeley Linguistic Society 17: 81–91. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ewing, Michael C. 2005. Colloquial Indonesian. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, K. Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 227–258. New York NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ewing, Michael C. & Susanna Cumming. 1998. Relative clauses in Indonesian discourse: Face to face and cyberspace interaction. In Papers from the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, Shobhana L. Chelliah & Willem J. de Reuse (eds), 79–96. Tempe AZ: Program for Southeast Asian Studies, Arizona State Unviersity.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara, Fox A. & Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 14–38. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1990a. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66(2): 297–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 1984. Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 225–246. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendrick, Kobin H. 2015. Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1(1): 164–190. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kornfilt, Jaklin & Nadezhda Vinokurova. 2017. Turkish and Turkic complex noun phrase constructions. In Matsumoto, Comrie & Sells (eds), 251–292.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463–516. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo. 2015. Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversations. In Information Structuring of Spoken Language from a Cross-linguistic Perspective [Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 283], M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds), 149–166. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mandelbaum, Jenny. 2013. Storytelling in conversation. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds), 492–507. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Yoshiko, Bernard Comrie & Peter Sells. 2017b. Noun-modifying clause constructions in languages of Eurasia: Rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries. In Matsumoto, Comrie & Sells (eds), 3–21.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonnell, Bradley. 2016. Symmetrical Voice Constructions in Besemah: A Usage-based Approach. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonnell, Bradley. in prep. Generalized Noun Modifying Clause Constructions in Besemah. ms.
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English Conversation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20(1): 402–419. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Payne, Thomas Edward. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ryave, Alan L. 1978. On the achievement of a series of stories. In Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, Jim Schenkein (ed.), 113–132. New York NY: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey. 1986. Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics 15(1–2): 127–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. When ’others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2): 205–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2008. Relativization in Sasak and Sumbawa, Eastern Indonesia. Language and Linguistics 9(4): 865–916.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tjung, Yassir. 2006. The Formation of Relative Clauses in Jakarta Indonesian: A Subject-Object Asymmetry. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinert, Regina & Jim Miller. 1996. Cleft constructions in spoken language. Journal of Pragmatics 25(2): 173–206. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.