Chapter 11
NP clustering in Mandarin conversational interaction
Noun phrases (NPs) have traditionally been analyzed as a phrasal level unit with hierarchical internal structures as well as syntactic roles in larger syntactic units. In this chapter, I examine NP-related patterns at the discourse level. Using Mandarin conversation data, this chapter focuses on multiple NPs that cluster as adjacent turn constructional units. The patterns identified include: (1) deictic forms supported by gestures for mutual gaze and joint attention; (2) repeated (first person singular) pronouns for mitigation of conflicting stance and self-distancing; (3) diverse NP forms for step-wise reference identification or elaboration; (4) joint production of multiple NPs to display shared stance or mutual orientation; and (5) lists of multiple items for persuasion, exemplification, and clarification as well as for affiliative stance or mutual orientation. As these patterns go beyond the realm of clausal level syntax with demonstrable interactional effects, they are taken to show that there is discourse-level grammar, or grammar-in-interaction, to be accounted for when syntactic notions such as NPs are examined in context, and interactional discourse-based constructions, though non-conventional at times, raise important questions about the shape, formation, and dynamic nature of interaction and grammar.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Scope and data
- 3.Patterns of clustering NPs
- 3.1Multiple NPs for mutual gaze and joint attention
- 3.2Repeated (first person singular) pronouns for mitigation of stance and self-distancing
- 3.3Multiple NPs, in varying forms, for step-wise referential identification
- 3.4Jointly produced multiple NPs for stance negotiation and mutual orientation
- 3.4.1Referent establishment
- 3.4.2Referent elaboration
- 3.5Multiple NPs in list constructions
- 4.Summary and discussion
- 4.1Locus, process, and nature of multiple NP units
- 4.2Multiple NP units as an interactional format
- 4.3Are multiple NP units features of grammar in interaction?
- 5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Appendix
References (73)
References
Canavan, Alexandra & Zipperlen, George. 1996. CALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert & Marshall, Catherine. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Elements of Discourse Understanding, Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds), 10–63. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna. 1986. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22(1): 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Brennan, Susan E. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Lauren B. Resnick & John M. Levine (eds), 127–149. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2007. Intonation units and grammatical structure in Wardaman and in cross-linguistic perspective. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27(1): 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2009. Intonation units and grammatical structure. Linguistics 33(5): 839–882. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, Wallace Chafe (ed.), 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4): 805–855. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45–89. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Barbara A. 1987. Discourse Structure and Anaphora. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Barbara A. 2007. Principles shaping grammatical practices: An exploration. Discourse Studies 9(3): 299–318. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geluykens, Ronald. 1988. The interactional nature of referent-introduction. Chicago Linguistic Society (24): 141–154.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, George Psathas (ed.), 97–121. New York NY: Irvington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. In Special double issue on Language and Social Interaction, Don H. Zimmerman & Candace West (eds). Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4): 272–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62(1–2): 29–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles. 2013. The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1): 8–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, Charles & Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Charles Goodwin & Allesandro Duranti (eds), 147–190. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59(4): 781–819. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 1997. When Discourse Becomes Syntax: Noun Phrases and Clauses as Emergent Syntactic Units in Finnish Conversational Discourse. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, John. 2007. Intersubjectivity and progressivity in references to persons (and places). In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, Tanya Stivers & Nicholas J. Enfield (eds), 255–280. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. 1987. Emergent grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society (13): 139–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. 1998. Emergent grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 155–75. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. The structure of intonation units in Japanese. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 3, Soonja Choi (ed.), 39–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Hongyin Tao. 1993. A comparative study of the structure of the intonation unit in English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Los Angeles, CA, January 9.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2005. Intonation units and the structure of spontaneous spoken language: A view from Hebrew. In Proceedings of the IDP05 International Symposium on Discourse-Prosody Interfaces, Auran Cyril, Roxanne Bertrand, Catherine Chanet, Annie Colas, Albert Di Cristo, Cristel Portes, Alain Reynier & Monique Vion (eds), 1–20. <[URL]>
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. List-construction as a task and a resource. In Interaction Competence, George Psathas (ed.), 63–92. Washington DC: University Press of America.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keevallik, Leelo. 2013. The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46(1): 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keevallik, Leelo. 2020. Multimodal “noun phrases”. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An Emergent Unit in Interaction [Typological Studies in Language 128], Sandra A. Thompson & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Haeyeon. 2005. Retroactive elaboration as non-error repair in English conversation. Language Research 41(4): 785–806.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lantolf, Jame & Thorne, Steve L. 2007. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition, Bill van Patten & Jessica C. Williams (eds), 201–224. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laury, Ritva & Helasvuo, Maria-Liisa. 2015. Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversation. In Information Structuring of Spoken Language from a Crosslinguistic Perspective, M. M. Jocelyn Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds), 149–166. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, Jee Won. 2010a. Repetition of Personal Pronominal Forms in Mandarin and Construction of Stance in Interaction. PhD dissertation, UCLA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene H. 1994. Responsive list construction: A conversational resource for accomplishing multifaceted social action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13(1): 20–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene H. 2002. Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In The Language of Turn and Sequence, Celia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 225–257. New York NY: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, Gene H. 2013. On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn-constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, Jack Sidnell, Makoto Hayashi & Geoffrey Raymond (eds), 95–134. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matsumoto, Kazuko. 1998. Detached NPs in Japanese conversation: Types and functions. Text 18(3): 417–444. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1996. Introduction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 1–51. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. Berkeley Linguistic Society (20): 402–419. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Thompson, Sandra A. 1995. What can conversation tell us about syntax? In Descriptive and Theoretical Modes in the Alternative Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 102], Philip W. Davis (ed.), 213–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 57–101. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Vol. II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sánchez-Ayala, Ivo. 2003. Constructions as resources for interaction: Lists in English and Spanish conversation. Discourse Studies 5(3): 323–349. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One direction for inquiry into grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 52–133. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selting, Margret. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 483–526. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1): 31–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tao, Hongyin. 1992. NP intonation units and referent identification. Berkeley Linguistic Society (18): 237–247. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tao, Hongyin. 1993. Units in Mandarin: Discourse and Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tao, Hongyin. 2001. Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember
. In Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, Rita Simpson & John Swales (eds), 116–144. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tao, Hongyin. 2016. Disputed memory and the social interactive functions of remembering/forgetting expressions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 106: 184–202. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tao, Hongyin. 2019. List gestures in Mandarin conversation and their implications for understanding multimodal interaction. In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction, Xiaoting Li & Tsuyoshi Ono (eds), 65–98. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Sandra A. & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7(4–5):481–505. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1962. Thought and Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J. 2002. Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Takanashi, Hiroko
2022.
Language reproduction and coordinated agency through resonant play.
East Asian Pragmatics 7:3
► pp. 395 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Tao, Hongyin
2022.
Multimodal amusement resonance as a conversation interactional device.
East Asian Pragmatics 7:3
► pp. 333 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Tao, Hongyin & Ryoko Suzuki
2022.
The pragmatics of creative language use in East Asian languages.
East Asian Pragmatics 7:3
► pp. 297 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.