Cover not available
Part of
Antipassive: Typology, diachrony, and related constructions
Edited by Katarzyna Janic and Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
[Typological Studies in Language 130] 2021
► pp. 483–514

Chapter 15
Indirect antipassive in Circassian

| Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences | Russian State University for the Humanities
| Higher School of Economics | Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
The article focuses on antipassive formation in Adyghe and Kabardian (Circassian < West Caucasian), polysynthetic languages with ergative alignment of basic morphosyntax. The Circassian antipassive is typologically unusual in several respects. First, it is derived not only from transitive, but also from intransitive verbs: in these cases, it eliminates the indirect object. Thus, antipassive in Circassian targets an object argument, but not necessarily the direct object, contradicting the general ergative patterning. Second, the Circassian antipassive is expressed by the change of the root-final vowel, which complicates the determination of the direction of the valency change. Third, although the Circassian antipassive mainly fulfils the semantic functions typologically associated with antipassives, sometimes the syntactic type of the argument (i.e. nominal vs. clause) is relevant for the choice of the valency frame as well.
Keywords: Circassian languages, polysynthesis, intransitive verbs, lability, applicatives
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Typologically relevant features of Circassian languages
  • 3.The morphology of the Circassian antipassive
    • 3.1Marked antipassive
    • 3.2Unmarked antipassive
    • 3.3The issue of directionality and formal marking
  • 4.Antipassive and the verbal lexicon
  • 5.Syntax, semantics and pragmatics of antipassivization in Circassian
  • 6.Typological outlook and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 23 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.15ark
References (59)
References
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Lander, Yury A. 2021. The North-West Caucasian languages. In The Oxford Handbook of the Languages of the Caucasus, Maria Polinsky (ed.), 369–446. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Letuchiy, Alexander B. 2011. Prefixes and suffixes in the Adyghe polysynthetic wordform: Types of interaction. In Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus, Vittorio S. Tomelleri, Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds), 495–514. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Testelets, Yakov G. 2019. Differential nominal marking in Circassian. Studies in Language 43(3): 715–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Ann. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 49–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie. 2008. Valency-changing operations in Wolof and the notion of “co-participation”. In Reciprocals and Reflexives, Theoretical and Typological Explanations, Ekkehard König & Volker Gast (eds), 289–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael & Wohlgemuth, Jan. 2010. The other end of universals: Theory and typology of rara . In Rethinking Universals. How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theories, Jan Wohlgemuth & Michael Cysouw (eds), 1–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dzuganova, Rita X. 2005. Ablautnye čeredovanija i ix funkcii v kabardino-čerkesskom jazyke (Ablaut alternations and their functions in Kabardian). PhD dissertation, Nal’čik.Google Scholar
Gishev, Nux T. 2008. Izbrannye trudy po jazykoznaniju (Selected Writings in Linguistics). Majkop: Kačestvo.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1988. The tale of two passives in Ute. In Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 417–440. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 86–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1976. Antipassivization: A functional typology. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicki Edge, Jeri J. Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van ValinJr. (eds), 202–211. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina. 2017. A Typology of Antipassives, with Special Reference to Mayan. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Hewitt, B. George. 1981. ‘Anti-passive’ and ‘labile’ constructions in North Caucasian. General Linguistics 22(3): 158–171.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2013. L’antipassif dans les langues accusatifs. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna & Nau, Nicole (eds). 2016 [2017]. Valency-changing Operations within and across Languages. Special issue of Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2).Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin I. 1994a. On the lexical distribution of agent-preserving and object-preserving transitivity alternations. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994b. Split syntactic ergativity: Toward an implicational hierarchy. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 47(2): 78–98.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo. 2010. Transitivity typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae-Jung Song (ed.), 346–367. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Korotkova, Natalia A. & Lander, Yury A. 2010. Deriving suffix ordering in polysynthesis: Evidence from Adyghe. Morphology 20: 299–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I. 2010. Voice typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae-Jung Song (ed.), 368–398. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kumakhov, Mukhadin A. 1971. Slovoizmenenie adygskix jazykov (Inflection in the Circassian languages). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1974. K probleme ablauta v abxazo-adygskix jazykax (On the problem of ablaut in West Caucasian). Ežegodnik iberijsko-kavkazskogo jazykoznanija (Annual of Ibero-Caucasian Linguistics) 1: 80–90.Google Scholar
1981. Sravnitelʹno-istoričeskaja fonetika adygskix (čerkesskix) jazykov (Historical-comparative Phonetics of the Circassian Languages). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kumakhov, Mukhadin A. & Vamling, Karina. 2009. Circassian Clause Structure. Malmö: Malmö University.Google Scholar
Lacroix, René. 2009. Description du dialecte laze d’Arhavi (caucasique du sud, Turquie). Grammaire et textes. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Lander, Yury A. 2012. Subject properties of the Adyghe absolutive: Evidence from relatives. Ms.Google Scholar
2016. Word formation in Adyghe. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 5, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 3508–3526. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lander, Yury A. & Letuchiy, Alexander B. 2010. Kinds of recursion in Adyghe morphology. In Recursion and Human Language, Harry van der Hulst (ed.), 263–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lander, Yury A. & Testelets, Yakov G. 2017. Adyghe. In The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis, Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds), 948–970. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian & Verhoeven, Elisabeth. 2006. Extraversive transitivization in Yucatec Maya and the nature of the applicative. In Case, Valency and Transitivity: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid I. Kulikov, Andrey L. Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 465–493. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letuchiy (Letučij), Aleksander B. 2009a. Affiksy benefaktiva i malefaktiva: Sintaksičeskie osobennosti i krug upotreblenij (Benefactive and malefactive markers: Syntactic peculiarities and range of uses). In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka (Aspects of Polysynthesis: Studies in Adyghe Grammar), Yakov Testelets (ed.), 329–371. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.Google Scholar
2009b. Kauzativ, dekauzativ i labil’nost’ (Causative, anticausative, and lability). In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygej-skogo jazyka (Aspects of Polysynthesis: Studies in Adyghe Grammar), Yakov Testelets (ed.), 372–428. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander B. 2009c. Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges in Typology: Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Alexandre Arkhipov & Patience Epps (eds), 147–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012. Ergativity in the Adyghe system of valency-changing derivations. In Ergativity, Valency and Voice, Gilles Authier & Katharina Haude (eds), 323–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letuchiy (|Letučij), Aleksander B. 2013. Tipologija labil’nyx glagolov (Typology of Labile Verbs). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander B. 2015. Scope versus ordering of operations: Causativization and ordering of valency-changing operations in Adyghe. In Affix Ordering across Languages and Frameworks, Stela Manova (ed.), 53–81. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. 2007. Prototypical Transitivity [Typological Studies in Language 72]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie. 2002. Relations entre fonctions syntaxiques et fonctions sémantiques en wolof. PhD dissertation, Lumière University Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Paris, Catherine. 1995. Localisation en tcherkesse: Forme et substance du référent. In Les Préverbes dans les langues d’Europe. Introduction à l’étude de la préverbation, André Rousseau (ed.), 345–379. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Septentrion.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2007. Applicative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. n.d. Introductory notes. Das grammatische Raritätenkabinett, University of Konstanz. <[URL]> (28 May 2017).
Polinsky, Maria. 2005a. Applicative constructions. In World Atlas of Language Structures, Matthew Dryer, Martin Haspelmath, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 442–445. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Antipassive constructions. In World Atlas of Language Structures, Matthew Dryer, Martin Haspelmath, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 438–441. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2017. Antipassive. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa D. Travis (eds), 308–331. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Renaudier, Marie. 2011. The antipassive in accusative languages: The case of Sereer (Senegal, Atlantic). Handout, February 2011. <[URL]> (1 August 2018).
Say, Sergey S. 2008. K tipologii antipassivnyx konstrukcij: Semantika, pragmatika, sintaksis (Towards a typology of antipassive constructions: Semantics, pragmatics, syntax). PhD dissertation, Institute of Linguistic Studies, Saint Petersburg.Google Scholar
Antipassive and the lexical meaning of verbs. In Antipassive: Typology, Diachrony, and Related Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 130], Katarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (This volume).
Serdobolskaya, Natalia V. 2011. Grammaticalization patterns of the Adyghe instrumental case. In Languages and Cultures in the Caucasus, Vittorio S. Tomelleri, Manana Topadze & Anna Lukianowicz (eds), 515–539. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.). 1976. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Voice parameters. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, Leonid I. Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 117–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2001. The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Smeets, Rieks. 1992. On valencies, actants and actant coding in Circassian. In Caucasian Perspectives, George Hewitt (ed.), 98–144. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19(5–6): 389–438.Google Scholar
Vigus, Meagan. 2018. Antipassive constructions: Correlations of form and function across languages. Linguistic Typology 22(3): 339–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Arkadiev, Peter
2022. Morphology of the Caucasian Languages: A Typological Overview. Jezikoslovni zapiski 28:1 DOI logo
Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker, Zaira Khalilova & Helma van den Berg
2021. Chapter 16. Antipassives in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2021. Chapter 1. The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
2021. Typology of coding patterns and frequency effects of antipassives. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 968 ff. DOI logo
Vidal, Alejandra & Doris L. Payne
2021. Chapter 11. Polyfunctional vanka- in Nivaĉle and the antipassive category. In Antipassive [Typological Studies in Language, 130], ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.