Cover not available
Part of
The Linguistics of Olfaction: Typological and Diachronic Approaches to Synchronic Diversity
Edited by Łukasz Jędrzejowski and Przemysław Staniewski
[Typological Studies in Language 131] 2021
► pp. 221–250

How to talk about smell in Japanese

| Hokkaido University
This chapter presents a corpus-informed description of olfactory language in Japanese, centering on everyday speech. Core smell vocabulary takes in the verbs kagu and niou, the nouns nioi and kaori, and the adjective kusai, and exhibits the clear presence of evaluation. Additional basic resources comprise major syntactic and collocational patterns, with smell nouns sharing combinatorial behavior with other perceptual nouns, as well as morphological patterns for complex adjectives in -kusai and sensory smell vocabulary involving mimetic adverbs with iconic encoding of temporal contour and intensity. Some smell terms describe intra-mouth perception as a component of taste in addition to regular olfaction. A review of smell vocabulary used in more formal registers again shows evaluation as a prominent feature.
Keywords: smell, Japanese, collocations, mimetics, olfaction in taste
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Core lexicon
  • 3.Expanding the core
    • 3.1Collocations of basic vocabulary
      • 3.1.1 kagu
      • 3.1.2niou
      • 3.1.3 kusai
      • 3.1.4 nioi
      • 3.1.5 kaori
      • 3.1.6Summary of collocational information
    • 3.2Morphology: -kusai
    • 3.3Sensory smell descriptors: Mimetics
      • 3.3.1 pun, puun, punpun
      • 3.3.2 tsun, tsuun, tsuntsun
      • 3.3.3Other mimetics: kunkun
      • 3.3.4Summary of mimetics
  • 4.Beyond the core
    • 4.1Other smell verbs: kaoru
    • 4.2Other smell adjectives
    • 4.3Other smell nouns
      • 4.3.1Derived nouns in -kusasa
      • 4.3.2Complex nouns with bound roots -ga, -koo-, -shuu-
      • 4.3.3Derived nouns with suffixoid -shuu
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.131.08bac
References (18)
References
Amanuma, Yasushi. 1974. Giongo Gitaigo Jiten (Dictionary of Mimetics). Tokyo: Tookyoodoo.Google Scholar
Backhouse, Anthony E. 1994. The Lexical Field of Taste: A Semantic Study of Japanese Taste Terms [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Supplementary Volume]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design 1: 59–86.Google Scholar
Hamano, Shoko. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese [Studies in Japanese Linguistics 10]. Stanford ca: CSLI.Google Scholar
JpWaC (Web-based corpus of Japanese), accessed via Sketch Engine <[URL]> (3 September 2020).
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vit, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1997. Noun-Modifying Constructions in Japanese: A Frame-Semantic Approach [Studies in Language Companion Series 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyajima, Tatsuo. 1972. Dooshi no Imi Yoohoo no Kijutsuteki Kenkyuu ( A Descriptive Study of the Meaning and Uses of Japanese Verbs). Tokyo: Shuuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki. 1989. Kiso Nihongo Jiten (Dictionary of Basic Japanese). Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Hirosi. 2012. The importance of taste verbs in some Khoe languages. Linguistics 50(3): 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishio, Toraya. 1972. Keiyooshi no Imi Yoohoo no Kijutsuteki Kenkyuu ( A Descriptive Study of the Meaning and Uses of Japanese Adjectives). Tokyo: Shuuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
NKD : Nihon Kokugo Daijiten (2nd ed.), Vol. 10, (Shogakukan Dictionary of Japanese). 2001. Tokyo: Shoogakukan.Google Scholar
Tokugawa, Munemasa & Miyajima, Tatsuo. 1972. Ruigigo Jiten (Dictionary of Near-Synonyms). Tokyo: Tookyoodoo.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1983. The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21(1): 123–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Sensation, perception and cognition: Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language 22(1): 96–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Nakami. 2003. Kurashi no Kotoba Giongitaigo Jiten (Dictionary of Everyday Mimetics). Tokyo: Koodansha.Google Scholar
Yanagi, Munetami, Adachi, Tooko, Gillet, Sylvie & Tanaka, Nozomi. 1986. Hana o mederu kokoro – Nihon to Seiyoo (Appreciating flowers – Japan and the West). Gengo Seikatsu 413: 4–17.Google Scholar