Part of
Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic TypologyEdited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 35–58
Edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 35–58
Chapter 2Towards standardization of morphosyntactic terminology for general linguistics
This paper proposes that just like phonologists, linguists working on morphosyntax should have a core set of standard terms that are understood in exactly the same way across the discipline. Most of these terms are traditional terms that are given a standard retro-definition, because linguists already behave as if these terms had the same meaning for everyone. The definitions are definitions of general concepts (i.e. comparative concepts, applicable to all languages in exactly the same way), but they are expected to be highly similar to language-particular categories with the same labels. If linguists were close to finding out the true natural-kind categories of Human Language that all grammars consist of, there would be no need for definitions, but since this seems to be a remote goal, research on general linguistics must rely on uniformly defined general terms.
Article outline
- 1.Terminological consistency and standardization
- 2.Comparative concepts, language-particular categories, and natural kinds
- 3.Examples of possible standard definitions of well-known terms
- 4.Principles for standard morphosyntactic terms
- 5.Shared-core definitions of comparative concepts
- 6.Stereotypes and prototypes
- 7.Standard comparative terms and language-particular description
- 8.Concluding remarks
-
Acknowledgements -
Notes -
References
References (49)
Baker, Mark C.
2001. The Atoms of Language. New York NY: Basic Books.
Booij, Geert E.
2005. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Brentari, Diane. 2002. Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics. In
Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, Richard P.
Meier, Kearsy
Cormier & David
Quinto-Pozos
(eds), 35–64. Cambridge: CUP. 
Brown, Dunstan & Chumakina, Marina. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In
Canonical Morphology and Syntax, Dunstan
Brown, Marina
Chumakina & Greville G.
Corbett
(eds), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.
Chomsky, Noam A.
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1985. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.
. 1978. Ergativity. In
Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P.
Lehmann
(ed.), 329–394. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Corbett, Greville G.
2007. Gender and noun classes. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy
Shopen
(ed.), 241–279. Cambridge: CUP.
2009. Universals and features. In
Universals of Language Today, Sergio
Scalise, Elisabetta
Magni & Antonietta
Bisetto
(eds), 129–143. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2007. Deconstructing categories: Finiteness in a functional-typological perspective. In
Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina
Nikolaeva
(ed.), 91–114. Oxford: OUP.
Croft, William. 2016. Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology
20(2): 377–393.
.
Dingemanse, Mark. 2019. ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. In
Ideophones, Mimetics, and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature 16], Kimi
Akita & Prashant
Pardeshi
(eds), 13–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
.
Dryer, Matthew S.
2009. The branching direction theory of word order correlations revisited. In
Universals of Language Today, Sergio
Scalise, Elisabetta
Magni & Antonietta
Bisetto
(eds), 185–207. Dordrecht: Springer.
2016. Crosslinguistic categories, comparative concepts, and the Walman diminutive. Linguistic Typology
20(2): 305–331.
.
García García, Luisa. 2020. The basic valency orientation of Old English and the causative ja-formation: A synchronic and diachronic approach. English Language & Linguistics. Cambridge University Press 24(1). 153–177.
.
Grewendorf, Günther. 1989. Ergativity in German [Studies in Generative Grammar 35]. Dordrecht: Foris.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2005. Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types. Linguistic Discovery
3(1): 1–21.
. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology
11(1): 119–132.
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language
86(3): 663–687.
.
. 2011a. On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology
15(3): 535–567.
. 2011b. The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica
45(1): 31–80.
. 2012. How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. In
Theories of Everything: In Honor of Edward Keenan [UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 17, article 16], Thomas
Graf, Denis
Paperno, Anna
Szabolcsi & Jos
Tellings
(eds), 109–130. Los Angeles CA: UCLA. <[URL].
. 2013. Argument indexing: A conceptual framework for the syntax of bound person forms. In
Languages across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik
Bakker & Martin
Haspelmath
(eds), 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2015. Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. In
How Categorical are Categories? New Approaches to the Old Questions of Noun, Verb, and Adjective, Joanna
Błaszczak, Dorota
Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof
Migdalski
(eds), 273–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2016. The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics
17(3): 291–319.
. 2018a. How comparative concepts and descriptive linguistic categories are different. In
Aspects of Linguistic Variation: Studies in Honor of Johan van der Auwera, Daniël
Van Olmen, Tanja
Mortelmans & Frank
Brisard
(eds), 83–113. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
.
. 2018b. The last word on polysynthesis: A review article. Linguistic Typology
22(2): 307–326.
.
. 2018c. Toward a new conceptual framework for comparing gender systems and some so-called classifier systems. Stockholm University talk handout.
. 2019. Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo
62(1): 93–115.
. 2020. The morph as a minimal linguistic form. Morphology 30(2). 117–134.
.
. 2021a. Bound forms, welded forms, and affixes: Basic concepts for morphological comparison. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2021(1). 7–28.
. 2021b. Comparing reflexive constructions in the world’s languages. In Janic, Katarzyna & Puddu, Nicoletta & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Reflexive constructions in the world’s languages (to appear). Berlin: Language Science Press.
Hennig, Mathilde. 2012. Grammatische Terminologie in der Schule: Einladung zur Diskussion. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik
40(3): 443–450.
.
Kibort, Anna. 2010. Towards a typology of grammatical features. In
Features: Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics, Anna
Kibort & Greville G.
Corbett
(eds), 64–106. Oxford: OUP.
Ladd, D. Robert. 2011. Phonetics in phonology. In
The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A.
Goldsmith, Jason
Riggle & Alan C.L.
Yu
(eds), 348–373. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lazard, Gilbert. 2002. Transitivity revisited as an example of a more strict approach in typological research. Folia Linguistica
36(3–4): 141–190.
Lehmann, Christian. 1983. Rektion und syntaktische Relationen. Folia Linguistica
17(1–4): 339–378.
Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol. 2009. Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. In
The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle
Lieber & Pavol
Štekauer
(eds), 3–18. Oxford: OUP.
List, Johann Mattis, Greenhill, Simon, Rzymski, Christoph, Schweikhard, Nathanael & Forkel, Robert
(eds). 2019. Concepticon 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. <[URL].
Massam, Diane. 2017. Incorporation and pseudo-incorporation in syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.
.
Moran, Steven & McCloy, Daniel
(eds). 2019. PHOIBLE 2.0. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. <[URL].
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Nichols, Johanna. 1984. Direct and oblique objects in Chechen-Ingush and Russian. In
Objects, Frans
Plank
(ed.), 183–209. London: Academic Press.
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2014. Serial verbs in Wambaya. In
Language Description Informed by Theory [Studies in Language Companion Series 147], Rob
Pensalfini, Myfany
Turpin & Diana
Guillemin
(eds), 263–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reuland, Eric. 2018. Reflexives and reflexivity. Annual Review of Linguistics
4(1): 81–107.
.
Spencer, Andrew & Luís, Ana R.
2012. Clitics. Cambridge: CUP.
Taylor, John R.
1989. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Tallman, Adam J. R. & Sandra Auderset
2023. Measuring and assessing indeterminacy and variation in the morphology-syntax distinction. Linguistic Typology 27:1 ► pp. 113 ff. 
Alfieri, Luca
2021. Parts of speech, comparative concepts and Indo-European linguistics. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 313 ff.
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff.
Reiner, Tabea
2021. Comparative concepts are not a different kind of thing. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 211 ff.
Zaefferer, Dietmar
2021. Beware of the emperor’s conceptual clothes: general linguistics must not be based on shaky dichotomies. Theoretical Linguistics 47:1-2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2020. The structural uniqueness of languages and the value of comparison for language description. Asian Languages and Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 346 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2023. Defining the word. WORD 69:3 ► pp. 283 ff.
Haspelmath, Martin
2024. Inflection and derivation as traditional comparative concepts. Linguistics 62:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Sufyan, Abu, Yani Rohmayani, Tubagus Chaeru Nugraha & Mohammed H. Al-Khresheh
2020. INTERFERENCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARABIC VOCABULARY (A MORPHOLOGICAL REVIEW). Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:4 ► pp. 1319 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.