Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology
Edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 101–136

Chapter 4
Typology of functional domains

| University of Colorado

The aim of this study is to advocate one of the aims of linguistic typology, viz. the discovery of how languages are similar or different with respect to the functions they encode and consequently for the development of a typology based solely on the functions encoded in the grammatical systems of individual languages. Such a typology has the advantage of not requiring or depending on aprioristic definitions. Such a typology also has the following additional advantages: it can serve as a tool in explaining the forms of utterances in individual languages and in explaining why certain languages have functions that other languages do not.

Article outline
  • 1.Aims of typology
  • 2.Approaches to the study of functional categories
  • 3.Problems with conceptual frameworks (comparative concepts)
  • 4.Current approaches to the discovery of functions
  • 5.Theoretical foundations for a non-aprioristic description of functions
  • 6.Discovery of the function of a linguistic form
    • 6.1The prerequisites for the discovery of functions
    • 6.2Two types of functions in the present approach
      • 6.2.1Relationship between functions as a main discovery tool
  • 7.The basic questions in the cross-linguistic study of functions
  • 8.Proposed object of typology of functions
  • 9.Point of view
    • 9.1Point of view of the subject as a marked category
    • 9.2Point of view of the subject as unmarked category
    • 9.3Goal orientation
    • 9.4Point of view of the subject and goal orientation in Hdi
  • 10.Locative predication
  • 11.Benefactive, malefactive, and the indirect object
    • 11.1Benefactive function
    • 11.2Indirectly affected argument
    • 11.3Conclusions
  • 12.Advantages of comparing functions encoded in the grammatical systems
  • 13.What the typology of functional functions will look like
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 9 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.132.04fra
References
Beeching, Kate
1980–1990 Un corpus d’entretiens spontanés. Enregistrés et transcrits par Kate Beeching. Southampton: LLAS Centre for Languages, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
COCA
Corpus of Contemporary American English.
Cohen, David
1989 L’aspect verbal. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1985 Tense. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1991 Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, Herbert , Davidse, Kristin & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
(eds.) 2010 Grammaticalization and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1991 SOV languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68(1): 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order. In Word Order in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 30], Michael Noonan & Pamela Downing (eds), 105–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a Definite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (28 May 2017).Google Scholar
2013b Indefinite articles. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (28 May 2017).Google Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud
1989 Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics 27(3): 517–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud & Fenk, August
2005 Crosslinguistic correlations between size of syllables, number of cases, and adposition order. In Sprache und Natürlichkeit: Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler, Gertraud Fenk-Oczlon & Christian Winkler (eds), 75–86. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1968 The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Richard, Harms (eds), 1–88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Fortescue, Michael, Mithun, Marianne & Evans, Nicholas
(eds) 2017 The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1985a Ergativity, number, and agreement. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds), 96–106. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1985b Truth and the indicative sentence. Studies in Language 9(2): 243–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Truth and the compositionality principle: A reply to Palmer. Studies in Language 11(1): 211–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence: A Case Study in Chadic [Studies in Language Companion Series 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Grammaticalization of number: From demonstratives to nominal and verbal plural. Linguistic Typology 1: 193–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Domains of point of view and coreferentiality: System interaction approach to the study of reflexives. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions, Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 40], Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Walker (eds), 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 A Grammar of Lele [Stanford Monographs in African Linguistics]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004 Principle of functional transparency in language structure and language change. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, David Rood & Adam Hodges (eds), 259–283. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a A Grammar of Gidar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008b Grammaticalization, typology, and semantics: Expanding the agenda. In Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], Maria Jose Lopez-Couso & Elena Seoane (eds), 61–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Grammaticalization within and outside of the domain. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds), 43–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammaticalization of the reference systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 625–635. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012 A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Indirect object and benefactive predications in Chadic: A typological sketch. Studies in African Linguistics 42(1): 33–68.Google Scholar
2016 Inflectional markers of sentential parsing. Lingua 183: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018a Toward a typology of reference systems. Languages and Linguistics 79: 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018b Coding locative predication in Chadic. In Afroasiatic: Data and Perspectives [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339], Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds), 203–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 What the grammaticalization of ‘head’ reveals about the semantic structure of a language. In Embodiment in Cross-Linguistic Studies: The ‘Head’, Iwona Kraska-Szlenk (ed.), 51–75. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Butters, Marielle
2020 The Emergence of Grammatical Functions. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Johnston, Eric, with Edwards, Adrian
2005 A Grammar of Mina. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Liu, Meichun, Ye, Yingying
2020 The reference system of Modern Mandarin Chinese. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40(1).
https://doi.org/
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Mycielski, Jan
1998 On some fundamental problems of mathematical linguistics. In Mathematical and Computational Analysis of Natural Language [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 45], Carlos Martin-Vide (ed.), 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt with Shay, Erin
2002 A Grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt with Erin Shay
2003 Explaining Language Structure through Systems Interaction [Typological Studies in Language 55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 The Role of Functions in Syntax: A Unified Approach to Language Theory, Description, and Typology [Typological Studies in Language 111]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Munkaila, Mohammed
In progress Locative predications in Hausa.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
n.d. Field-notes on Hona.
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Johnston, Eric
n.d. Field-notes for Mina dictionary.
Garrigues-Cresswell, Martine with Weibegué, Christophe
1981 Livre de Lecture Lélé. Sarh: Centre D’études Linguistiques.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & van der Auwera, Johan
2012 This is to count as a construction. Folia Linguistica 46(1): 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Gilles Gaston
1960 Pensée Formelle et Science de l’Homme. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Grammar, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine
2016 Associated motion in South America: Typological and areal perspectives. Linguistic Typology 20(1): 81–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in cross-linguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15(3): 535–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang & Perdue, Clive
1997 The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Heine, Bernd, Hong, Bo, Long, Haiping, Narrog, Heiko & Rhee, Seongha
(eds) 2019 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, second, extensively revised and updated edition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
2004 On the status of linguistics with particular regard to typology. The Linguistic Review 21: 389–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K.
2007 Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3): 393–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milewski, Tadeusz
1950 La structure de la phrase dans les langues indigènes de l’Amérique du nord. Lingua Posnaniensis 2: 162–207.Google Scholar
1962 Typological similarities between Caucasian and American Indian languages. Folia Orientalia IV: 221–230.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1991 Active/agentive case and its motivations. Language 67: 510–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne & Chafe, Wallace
1999 What are S, A, and O? Studies in Language 23(3): 579–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul
2000 The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
NKJP: Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego-Polish National Corpus
Radetzky, Paula & Smith, Tomoko
2010 An areal and cross-linguistic study of benefactive and malefactive constructions. In Benefactives and Malefactives. Typological Perspectives and Case Studies [Typological Studies in Language 92], Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds), 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Otanes, Fe T.
1972 Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuh, Russell G.
2017 A Chadic Cornucopia, Paul Newman (ed.). Oakland CA: California Digital Library. [URL] (12 November 2020).Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2006 Word order and linearization. In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 13, Keith Brown (ed.), 642–649. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Variation in major constituent order: A global and European perspective. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Anna Siewierska (ed.), 475–552. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Bakker, Dik
1996 The distribution of subject and object agreement and word order type. Studies in Language 20(1): 115–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanini, Jean
1962 La voix pronominale en ancien et en moyen français. Aix-en-Provence: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1963 Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Cysouw, Michael
(eds) 2010 Rara & Rarissima. Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.