Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology
Edited by Luca Alfieri, Giorgio Francesco Arcodia and Paolo Ramat
[Typological Studies in Language 132] 2021
► pp. 279–312

Chapter 8
The non-universality of linguistic categories

Evidence from pluractional constructions

| University of Bologna
This paper aims at giving a typological overview of pluractionality in order to show how grammatical categories, in cross-linguistic perspective, cannot be considered as universally valid entities. After having defined the phenomenon, I will present the main functions and some formal characteristics that pluractional markers have in the languages of the world. Then, I will describe the diachronic sources from which pluractional markers probably come from. Finally, I will discuss the grammatical status that pluractionality has in cross-linguistic perspective in the light of the broad variety it shows in the languages of the world and also taking into consideration data from specific languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and methodological preliminaries
  • 3.Functional characteristics of pluractional markers
    • 3.1Core functions
    • 3.2Additional functions
    • 3.3Rare functions
    • 3.4The pluractional conceptual space
  • 4.Formal properties of pluractional markers
  • 5.Diachronic sources of pluractional markers
  • 6.The grammatical status of pluractional markers in cross-linguistic perspective
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations (cf. Leipzig Glossing Rules)
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 9 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.132.08mat
References (72)
References
Alamin, Suzan. 2012. The Nominal and Verbal Morphology of Tima: A Niger-Congo Language Spoken in the Nuba Mountains. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Bar-el, Leonora. 2008. Verbal number and aspect in Skw̠kw̠ú7mush. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 37: 31–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz. 1911. Introduction. In Handbook of North American Languages, Part 1, Franz Boas (ed.), 1–83. Washington DC: Smithsonian, Institution, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cabredo-Hofherr, Patricia & Laca, Brenda. 2012. Introduction – Event plurality, verbal plurality and distributivity. In Verbal Plurality and Distributivity, Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds), 1–24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1998. Plurality in ǂHoan. Cologne: Khoisan-Forum at the Institut für Afrikanistik, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1982. Grammatical relations in Huichol. In Studies in Transitivity, Paul J. Hopper & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 95–115. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2000. Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2009. Grammatical categories and relations: Universality vs. language-specificity and construction-specificity. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1): 441–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cusic, David. 1981. Verbal Plurality and Aspect. PhD dissertation, University of Stanford.
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 1983. The Turkana Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dom, Sebastian, Segerer, Guillaume & Bostoen, Koen. 2015. Antipassive/associative polysemy in Cilubà (Bantu, L31a). Studies in Language 39(2): 354–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1968. Studien sur verbalen Pluralität: Iterativum, Distributivum, Durativum, Intensivum in der allgemeinen Grammatik, in Lateinischen und Hethitischen. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In Essays in Language Function and Language Type, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds). 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (5 May 2019).Google Scholar
Du Feu, Veronica. 1996. Rapanui. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dunn, Michael J. 1999. A Grammar of Chukchi. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.
Durie, Mark. 1986. The grammaticization of number as a verbal category. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: February 15–17, 1986, Berkeley, Vassiliki Nikiforidou, Mary VanClay, Mary Niepokuj & Deborah Feder (eds), 355–370. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel Leonard & Kern, Barbara. 1997. Wari’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Colleen M. 2016. Morphology in the Muskogean languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 10: 681–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas Language of New Guinea. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1993. A Grammar of Mupun. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
. 1997. Grammaticalization of number: From demonstratives to nominal and verbal plural. Linguistic Typology 1(2): 193–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. A Grammar of Lele. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2012. A Grammar of Wandala. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gates, Jesse P. 2017. Verbal triplication morphology in Stau (Mazi dialect). Transactions of the Philological Society 115(1): 14–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Polis, Stéphane. 2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12: e12270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Tom. 2011. Ute Reference Grammar [Culture and Language Use 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Bank, Sebastian, Forkel, Robert & Haspelmath, Martin. 2018. Glottolog 3.2. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. <[URL]> (24 September 2018).Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 217–242. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 119–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David & Comrie, Bernard (eds). 2005. The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). PhD dissertation, Université Paris-Diderot – Paris VII.
. 2014. Clause linking in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 264–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The spontaneous-autobenefactive prefix in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38(2): 271–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaggar, Philip. 2001. Hausa [London Oriental and African Language Library 7]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Wendell & Jones, Paula. 1991. Barasano Syntax. Dallas TX: SIL & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, Christa. 2008. A Grammar of Modern Khwe (Central Khoisan). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Kimball, Geoffrey D. 1991. Koasati Grammar. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Lindström, Eva. 2002. Topics in the Grammar of Kuot. A Non-Austronesian Language of New Ireland, Papua New Guinea. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
Mattiola, Simone. 2017. The conceptual space of pluractional constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio 16(1): 119–146.Google Scholar
. 2019. Typology of Pluractional Constructions in the Languages of the World [Typological Studies in Language 125]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattiola, Simone & Gildea, Spike. In preparation. The pluractional marker -pödï of Akawaio (Cariban).
Melis, Antonino. 1999. Description du Masa (Tchad): Phonologie, sintaxe et dictionnaire encyclopédique. PhD dissertation, University of Tours.
Mithun, Marianne. 1988. Lexical category and the evolution of number marking. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 211–234. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Noun and verb in Iroquoian languages: Multicategorization from multiple criteria. In Approaches to the typology of word classes, Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds), 397–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1974. Topics in Mojave Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of California San Diego.
Munshi, Sadaf. 2006. Jammu and Kashmir Burushaski. Language, Language Contact, and Change. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Newman, Paul. 1980. The Classification of Chadic within Afroasiatic. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.Google Scholar
. 1990. Nominal and Verbal Plurality in Chadic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The Hausa Language. An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1992. A Grammar of Lango. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orkaydo, Ongaye Oda. 2013. The category of number in Konso. In Sounds and Words through the Ages: Afroasiatic Studies from Turin, Alessandro Mengozzi & Mauro Tosco (eds), 253–266. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Orkaydo, Ongaye Oda & Mous, Maarten. 2017. The semantics of pluractionals and punctuals in Konso (Cushitic, Ethiopia). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38(2): 223–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 2013. The challenge of Maa ‘Away’. In Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In Honor of Scott DeLancey [Typological Studies in Language 103], Tim Thornes, Erik Andvik, Gwendolyn Hyslop & Joana Jansen (eds), 260–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reh, Mechthild. 1985. Die Krongo-Sprache (Nìinò Mó-Dì). Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Rosen, Joan. 1977. The functions of reduplication in Indonesian. In Miscellaneous Studies in Indonesian and Languages of Indonesia, Part IV, Ignatius Suharno (ed.). NUSA 5: 1–9.Google Scholar
Sambou, Pierre. 2014. Relations entre les rôles syntaxiques et les rôles sémantiques dans les langues jóola. PhD dissertation, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar.
Smeets, Ineke. 2008. A Grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Součková, Kateřina. 2011. Pluractionality in Hausa. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Steeman, Sander. 2012. A Grammar of Sandawe. A Khoisan Language of Tanzania. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Tatevosov, Sergej. 2002. The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology 6(3): 317–401.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Mark. 2008. A Grammar of Eton. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2017. Le Bedja. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba N. 2005. Verbal number and suppletion. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 326–29. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013. Verbal number and suppletion. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (4 May 2019).Google Scholar
Weber, David J. 1989. A Grammar Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Esther. 2007. The Semantic Typology of Pluractionality. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
Woollams, Geoff. 1996. A Grammar of Karo Batak, Sumatra. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar