Part of
Caused Accompanied Motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg and Birgit Hellwig
[Typological Studies in Language 134] 2022
► pp. 341368
Brewer, W. F.
(1985) The story schema: Universal and culture-specific properties. In D. R. Olsen, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 167–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Vries, L.
(2005) Towards a typology of tail-head linkage in Papuan languages. Studies in Language, 29(2), 363–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Areal pragmatics of New Guinea: Thematization, distribution and recapitulative linkage in Papuan narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(6), 811–828. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, M., Reesink, G., & Terrill, A.
(2002) The East Papuan languages: A preliminary typological appraisal. Oceanic Linguistics, 41(1), 28–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ELAN (Version 5.0) [Computer software]
(2017) Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from [URL]
Foley, W. A.
(1986) The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, H.
(2019) Child-directed speech in Qaqet: A language of East New Britain, Papua New Guinea (Doctoral dissertation). Universität zu Köln, Cologne.
Heeschen, V.
(1998) An ethnographic grammar of the Eipo language spoken in the central mountains of Irian Jaya (West New Guinea), Indonesia. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Hellwig, B.
(2019) A grammar of Qaqet. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P.
(2004) Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maas, U.
(2010) Literat und orat. Grundbegriffe der Analyse geschriebener und gesprochener Sprache. Grazer Linguistische Studien, 73, 21–150.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, B., Kopecka, A., Bowerman, M., Gullberg, M., & Majid, A.
(2012) Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In A. Kopecka & B. Narasimhan (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. K.
(1993) A language which defies description by ordinary means. In W. A. Foley (Ed.), The role of theory in language description (pp. 87–130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A. K., & Hammarström, H.
(2017) The Trans New Guinea family. In B. Palmer (Ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide (pp. 21–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Praat (Version 6.0.25) [Computer software]
(2017) P. Boersma & D. Weenin. Retrieved from [URL]
Stebbins, T. N.
(2009) The Papuan languages of the Eastern Bismarcks: Migration, origins and connections. In B. Evans (Ed.), Discovering history through language: Papers in honour of Malcolm Ross (pp. 223–243). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Toolbox (Version 1.6.2) [Computer software]
(2017) SIL International. Retrieved from [URL]
Unterladstetter, V.
(2018) Multi-verb constructions in Eastern Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation). Universität zu Köln, Cologne.
Wilkins, D. P., & Hill, D.
(1995) When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(2/3), 209–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar