The Discourse and Interactive Functions of Obligation Expressions

Cited by eight other publications

Orthaber, Sara

2023. Complaint Calls and Facebook Complaints. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 239 ff.

ÖZBAY, Ali Şükrü & Zehra GÜRSOY

2023. Computerized corpus as a tool for educational technology and learning in the analysis of four-word recurrent expressions. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 6:1 ► pp. 249 ff.

Rodríguez Rosique, Susana

2018. Tenses in interaction. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 223 ff.

Aijmer, Karin

2017. The Semantic Field of Obligation in an English-Swedish Contrastive Perspective. In Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 5], ► pp. 13 ff.

Rubinstein, Aynat

2014. On Necessity and Comparison. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95:4 ► pp. 512 ff.

Scheibman, Joanne

2014. Referentiality, predicate patterns, and functions of we-utterances in American English interactions. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 23 ff.

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher

2001. Regularity in Semantic Change,

Nordlinger, Rachel & Elizabeth Closs Traugott

1997. Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence fromought to. English Language and Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 295 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.