Cited by

Cited by 113 other publications

Adler, Silvia
2015. Liaisons « non marquées » de prédications dans l'accroche publicitaire. Langages N° 200:4  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Adler, Silvia
2018. Slogans publicitaires à comparatifs de supériorité. La linguistique Vol. 54:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Allen Harris, Randy
2020. Ploke. Metaphor and Symbol 35:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Barth, Danielle
2019. Effects of average and specific context probability on reduction of function wordsBEandHAVE. Linguistics Vanguard 5:1 DOI logo
Beni, Majid Davoody
2017. The Code Model of Biosemiotics and the Fate of the Structuralist Theory of Mental Representation. Biosemiotics 10:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Bouchard, Denis
2005. Exaption and linguistic explanation. Lingua 115:12  pp. 1685 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Steven
2021. Theatre and storytelling. In The Unification of the Arts,  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
CAMACHO, Roberto Gomes
2017. Alinhamento e estratégias de relativização. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 33:1  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Camacho, Roberto Gomes, Erotilde Goreti Pezatti, Danytiele Cristina Fernandes de Paula & Carolina Cau Sposito Ribeiro de Abreu
2017. Transparência linguística. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 17:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Campos, Guillermo González & Christian Lehmann
2021. The Cabecar Relative Clause. International Journal of American Linguistics 87:2  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Carlier, Anne
2018. Le système des démonstratifs en cours de restructuration en latin tardif : une séparation des rôles référentiel et pragmatique de la deixis. Langages N° 208:4  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Carvalho, Danniel da Silva
2021. SOBRE A DOMESTICAÇÃO DO GÊNERO GRAMATICAL. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 60:1  pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Clarke, Ben
2016. Textual dynamism as a heuristic for a delicate semantic description of ellipsis patterns. English Text Construction 9:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Croft, William
2002. The Darwinization of Linguistics. Selection 3:1  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Cucatto, Mariana
2021. Para mayor satisfacción (de): expresión conectiva plurifuncional, fundamentación y disuasión. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José Ruiz
2022. Analogical and Non-analogical Resemblance in Figurative Language: A Cognitive-Linguistic Perspective. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453],  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
2023. HOW LIKE-SIMILE RELATES TO METAPHOR: AN EXPLORATION OF ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow  pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde
2020. Semantic differences between strong and weak verb forms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 31:3  pp. 393 ff. DOI logo
Demidova, Tatyana V., Sergey A. Barov & Tatyana M. Soloveva
2023. Specifics of Lexical and Grammatical Rules in the Chinese Language. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 14:2  pp. 418 ff. DOI logo
Dent, Cathy & Lois Rosenberg
1990. Visual and Verbal Metaphors: Developmental Interactions. Child Development 61:4  pp. 983 ff. DOI logo
Ding, Hongdi
2022. Interrogatives of Liangshan Yi. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 45:1  pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Ding, Hongdi & Sicong Dong
2024. Interrogatives of reason in Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 25:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Drozhashchikh, Nataliia
2022. Form-Meaning Systematicity in Old English Alliterative Verse. Neophilologus 106:3  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Eslami Rasekh, Abbas, Mansoor Tavakoli, Momene Ghadiri & Reza Zabihi
2013. Investigating the role of context in resolving discourse anaphoric relations: Does text genre variability play a part?. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:1 DOI logo
Fischer, Olga C.M.
2003. Principles of grammaticalization and linguistic reality. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English,  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Fonteyn, Lauren, Hendrik De Smet & Liesbet Heyvaert
2015. What It Means to Verbalize. Journal of English Linguistics 43:1  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Futrell, Richard & Michael Hahn
2022. Information Theory as a Bridge Between Language Function and Language Form. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Givón, T.
Givón, T.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2018. Taming iconicity in the Spanish and Italian translations of Shakespeare’sSonnets. English Text Construction 11:1  pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Guido, Maria Grazia
2018. Trauma-Narrative Analysis at the Level of Pragmalinguistic Schemata. In English as a Lingua Franca in Migrants' Trauma Narratives,  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Hahn, Michael, Rebecca Mathew & Judith Degen
2022. Morpheme Ordering Across Languages Reflects Optimization for Processing Efficiency. Open Mind 5  pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Hahn, Michael & Yang Xu
2022. Crosslinguistic word order variation reflects evolutionary pressures of dependency and information locality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119:24 DOI logo
Haiman, John
1990. Hagit Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics. (Syntax & Semantics, 19.) New York: Academic Press, 1986. Pp. xii + 380.. Journal of Linguistics 26:1  pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 19:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hausser, Roland
2014. Cognitive Foundations of Semantics. In Foundations of Computational Linguistics,  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Hausser, Roland
2014. Structure and Functioning of Signs. In Foundations of Computational Linguistics,  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Havu, Jukka & Mikko Höglund
2015. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Complementation in the Tough Construction. In Perspectives on Complementation,  pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2014. The cognitive evolution of Englishes. In The Evolution of Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G49],  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
HOFFMANN, THOMAS
2017. Construction Grammar as Cognitive Structuralism: the interaction of constructional networks and processing in the diachronic evolution of English comparative correlatives. English Language and Linguistics 21:2  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2019. English Comparative Correlatives, DOI logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2021. The Cognitive Foundation of Post-colonial Englishes, DOI logo
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Horsch, Jakob
2024. Cuanto(s) más datos, (tanto) mejor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1  pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Yan
1991. A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27:2  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Höglund, Mikko
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2021. Complementary Contrastive Constructions. In Discourse Constructions in English [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2010. Review of Gilquin (2010): Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Studies in Language 34:4  pp. 922 ff. DOI logo
Karrebæk, Martha Sif
2003. Iconicity and structure in codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism 7:4  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Kazzazi, Kerstin
2011. Ich brauche mix-cough: cross-linguistic influence involving German, English and Farsi. International Journal of Multilingualism 8:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Kendon, Adam
2017. Reflections on the “gesture-first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:1  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Kendon, Adam
Kim, Soung-U
2019. The Morphosyntax of Jejuan –ko Clause Linkages. Lanaguage Research 55:2  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Kocab, Annemarie, Jayden Ziegler & Jesse Snedeker
2019. It takes a village: The role of community size in linguistic regularization. Cognitive Psychology 114  pp. 101227 ff. DOI logo
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel & Ľudmila Lacková
2020. Iconicity in syntax and the architecture of linguistic theory. Studies in Language 44:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Levy, Elena T. & David McNeill
1992. Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes 15:3  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Wei-lun
2020. Narrative viewpoint and subjective construal across languages. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:2  pp. 334 ff. DOI logo
McNeill, David
2017. Chapter 5. Gesture-speech unity. In Why Gesture? [Gesture Studies, 7],  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
McNeill, David & Elena T. Levy
1993. Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes 16:4  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Mcneill, David, Elena T. Levy & Susan D. Duncan
2015. Gesture in Discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,  pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Torjus Midtgarden
2002. Iconic aspects of language and language use: Peirces work on iconicity revisited. semi 2002:139  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Mittelberg, Irene
2017. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1 DOI logo
Nakano, Yukiko I., Masashi Okamoto & Toyoaki Nishida
2005. Enriching Agent Animations with Gestures and Highlighting Effects. In Intelligent Media Technology for Communicative Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3490],  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko
2010. The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology 20:1  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko
2020. Chapter 3. The scope of modal categories. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Nir, Bracha
2015. Frames for clause combining. Constructions and Frames 7:2  pp. 348 ff. DOI logo
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1999. The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28:1  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Occhino, Corrine, Benjamin Anible, Erin Wilkinson & Jill P. Morford
2017. Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder. Gesture 16:1  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Odiegwu, Nancy Chiagolum & Jesús Romero-Trillo
2024. Gradience in iconicity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1  pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus & Gary Lupyan
2018. People Can Create Iconic Vocalizations to Communicate Various Meanings to Naïve Listeners. Scientific Reports 8:1 DOI logo
Rainer, Franz, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Francesco Gardani & Hans Christian Luschützky
2014. Morphology and meaning: An overview. In Morphology and Meaning [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 327],  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Rohrer, Patrick Louis, Júlia Florit-Pons, Ingrid Vilà-Giménez & Pilar Prieto
2022. Children Use Non-referential Gestures in Narrative Speech to Mark Discourse Elements Which Update Common Ground. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8  pp. 1151 ff. DOI logo
ROMASANTA, RAQUEL P.
2022. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 26:2  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2023. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica 95:1  pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Introduction. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Verbal –s. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Scholman, Merel C. J., Liam Blything, Kate Cain, Jet Hoek & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2022. Discourse rules: the effects of clause order principles on the reading process. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 37:10  pp. 1277 ff. DOI logo
Sicoli, Mark A, Tanya Stivers, NJ Enfield & Stephen C Levinson
2015. Marked Initial Pitch in Questions Signals Marked Communicative Function. Language and Speech 58:2  pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
So, Wing Chee, Sotaro Kita & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2013. When Do Speakers Use Gestures to Specify Who Does What to Whom? The Role of Language Proficiency and Type of Gestures in Narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42:6  pp. 581 ff. DOI logo
Sohn, Ho-min
2015. Evolution of Korean honorifics. Korean Linguistics 17:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
TOMOZAWA, HIROTAKA
2012. COORDINATION AND FUNCTIONAL REDUNDANCY: THE CASE OF ADJECTIVES OF TEMPORAL ORDERING. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29:1  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Uljas, Sami
2021. Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation. Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
van Hout, Roeland & Pieter Muysken
2016. Taming Chaos. Chance and Variability in the Language Sciences. In The Challenge of Chance [The Frontiers Collection, ],  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Versluis, Christine & Lou-Ann Kleppa
Vesterinen, Rainer
2008. Complementos finitos e infinitivos dos verbos causativosdeixarefazer– Causação directa vs. indirecta e a noção de controlo. Studia Neophilologica 80:1  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Vesterinen, Rainer
2012. Control and dominion: Factivity and mood choice in Spanish. Language and Cognition 4:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Warkentin, Germaine
2017. Reading the ‘Cheyenne Letter’: Towards a Typology of Inscription beyond the Alphabet. In Approaches to the History of Written Culture [New Directions in Book History, ],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Wenz, Karin
1996. Iconicity in verbal descriptions of space. In The Construal of Space in Language and Thought,  pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Wilkinson, Ray, Suzanne Beeke & Jane Maxim
2010. Formulating Actions and Events With Limited Linguistic Resources: Enactment and Iconicity in Agrammatic Aphasic Talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Xiao, Wei, Li Li & Jin Liu
2023. To Move or Not to Move: An Entropy-based Approach to the Informativeness of Research Article Abstracts across Disciplines. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 30:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Xiong, Xueliang
1998. First person zero anaphor as a cognitive unit in Chinese. <i>WORD</i> 49:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Yau, Shun-chiu
2008. The Role of Visual Space in Sign Language Development. In Space in Languages of China,  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Ye, Zhengdao
2019. The Emergence of Expressible Agency and Irony in Today’s China: A Semantic Explanation of the New Bèi-construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Zunino, Gabriela Mariel
2022. Reseña a Francis, Elaine J. 2022. Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory. Oxford University Press, 267 pp.. Cuadernos de Lingüística de El Colegio de México 9 DOI logo
Петрова , Инна Михайловна
2020. Нарушение иконичности языкового знака как показатель изменения когнитивного фокуса (на материале английского языка). ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ :№12/3  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
黄, 琪
2021. Iconicity Analysis of English Middle Voice. Modern Linguistics 09:06  pp. 1635 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Subject index. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 6. Conclusions. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 3. Cognitive models. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2014. Acknowledgements. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 5. Content operations across levels of representation. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Name index. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 2. Theoretical pre-requisites. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. References. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 4. Cognitive operations. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Cognitive Modeling [Human Cognitive Processing, 45],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Literatur. In Nicht-ikonische Chronologie,  pp. 286 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.