Nominalization in Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area
A typological perspective
Carol Genetti | University of California Santa Barbara, Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University
Tibeto-Burman languages exhibit an interesting composite of behavior in nominalized structures. In particular, these languages make extensive use of clausal nominalization (found in attributive phrases, complementation, relative clauses, and independent utterances), as well as derivational nominalization. This paper describes the syntactic and functional dimensions of nominalization in five distantly-related Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. It demonstrates that the same affixes are used to derive lexical nouns and lexical adjectives and that this bifunctionality is a natural consequence of clausal nominalization. While clausal and derivational nominalizations are distinct structures synchronically, each can give rise to the other. The center of these historical developments is relativization, which instantiates clausal syntax but is ultimately a referential device.
Estrada-Fernández, Zarina & Moisés David Ramírez-Mendívil
2015. Nominalización clausal en tegüima u ópata y névome. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 15:2 ► pp. 339 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.