The Moral Laboratory

Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept

Frank Hakemulder | Utrecht University
ISBN 9789027222237 (Eur) | EUR 105.00
ISBN 9781556196805 (USA) | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027298546 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
Google Play logo
The idea that reading literature changes the reader seems as old as literature itself. Through the ages philosophers, writers, and literary scholars have suggested it affects norms, empathic ability, self-concept, beliefs, etc. This book examines what we actually know about these effects. And it finds strong evidence for the old claims. However, it remains unclear what aspects of the reading experience are responsible for these effects. Applying methods of the social sciences to this particular problem of literary theory, this book presents a psychological explanation based upon the conception of literature as a moral laboratory. A series of experiments examines whether imagining oneself in the shoes of characters affects beliefs about what it must be like to be someone else, and whether it affects beliefs about consequences of behavior. The results have implications for the role literature could play in society, for instance, in an alternative for traditional moral education.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Cited by

Cited by 118 other publications

Ahlzén, Rolf
2019. Narrativity and medicine: some critical reflections. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 14:1 DOI logo
Alsup, Janet
2013. Teaching Literature in an Age of Text Complexity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 57:3  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Altes, Liesbeth Korthals
2020. Toward a Hermeneutical Ethics of Narrative. Poetics Today 41:4  pp. 739 ff. DOI logo
Barnes, Jennifer L.
2018. Imaginary Engagement, Real-World Effects: Fiction, Emotion, and Social Cognition. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Bilandzic, Helena
2011. The Complicated Relationship Between Media and Morality. Journal of Media Psychology 23:1  pp. 46 ff. DOI logo
Bilandzic, Helena, Cornelia Schnell & Freya Sukalla
2019. The Cultivation of Idealistic Moral Expectations: The Role of Television Exposure and Narrative Engageability. Mass Communication and Society 22:5  pp. 604 ff. DOI logo
Bjørkøy, Aasta Marie Bjorvand
2020. Litteratur. In Samtidslitterære alderdommer,  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Borkfelt, Sune
2022. Literary Narratives and the Empathics of Slaughter. In Reading Slaughter [Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature, ],  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Bortolussi, Marisa, Peter Dixon & Christopher Linden
2018. Putting Perspective Taking in Perspective. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Brainard, Lori A.
2021. Putting “Perspectives” in Perspective: Literary Fiction, Empathy & Diversity In the Public Affairs Classroom. Public Integrity 23:3  pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Brokerhof, Inge M., Sandra J. Sucher, P. Matthijs Bal, Frank Hakemulder, Paul G. W. Jansen & Omar N. Solinger
2023. Developing Moral Muscle in a Literature-Based Business Ethics Course. Academy of Management Learning & Education 22:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Buttrick, Nicholas, Erin C. Westgate & Shigehiro Oishi
2023. Reading Literary Fiction Is Associated With a More Complex Worldview. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 49:9  pp. 1408 ff. DOI logo
Caracciolo, Marco
2013. Phenomenological metaphors in readers’ engagement with characters: The case of Ian McEwan’s Saturday. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 22:1  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Caracciolo, Marco
2022. Gli studi letterari cognitivi e lo statuto dell'interpretazione: un tentativo di mappatura teorica. In La narrazione come incontro [Moderna/Comparata, 41],  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Caracciolo, Marco & Thom Van Duuren
2015. Changed by Literature? A Critical Review of Psychological Research on the Effects of Reading Fiction. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 17:4  pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Chesnokova, Anna & Willie van Peer
2021. “There Are as Many Kinds of Love as There Are Hearts”: Age-Gap Relationships in Literature and Cultural Attitudes. In International Handbook of Love,  pp. 807 ff. DOI logo
Comunello, Francesca, Andrea Rosales, Simone Mulargia, Francesca Ieracitano, Francesca Belotti & Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol
2022. ‘Youngsplaining’ and moralistic judgements: exploring ageism through the lens of digital ‘media ideologies’. Ageing and Society 42:4  pp. 938 ff. DOI logo
de Graaf, Anneke
2023. The role of identification and self-referencing in narrative persuasion. Communications 48:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
de Jonge, Julia, Serena Demichelis, Simone Rebora & Massimo Salgaro
2022. Operationalizing perpetrator studies. Focusing readers’ reactions to The Kindly Ones by Jonathan Littell. Journal of Literary Semantics 51:2  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
De Mulder, Hannah N. M., Frank Hakemulder, Rianne van den Berghe, Fayette Klaassen & Jos J. A. van Berkum
2017. Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction. Scientific Study of Literature 7:1  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Deane, Paul, Swapna Somasundaran, René R. Lawless, Hilary Persky & Colleen Appel
2019. The Key Practice, Building and Sharing Stories and Social Understandings: The Intrinsic Value of Narrative. ETS Research Report Series 2019:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Eden, Allison, Serena Daalmans, Merel Van Ommen & Addy Weljers
2017. Melfi’s Choice: Morally Conflicted Content Leads to Moral Rumination in Viewers. Journal of Media Ethics 32:3  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Eder, Thomas
2012. Kognitive Literaturwissenschaft. In Handbuch Literatur und Philosophie,  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Eekhof, Lynn S. & Raymond A. Mar
2024. Does reading about fictional minds make us more curious about real ones?. Language and Cognition 16:1  pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Eekhof, Lynn S., Kobie van Krieken & Roel M. Willems
2022. Reading about minds: The social-cognitive potential of narratives. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:5  pp. 1703 ff. DOI logo
Ercolino, Stefano
2018. Negative empathy. Orbis Litterarum 73:3  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
2019. Evaluating Narrativization Practices in Turkish TV serials as a Venue of Popular Historiography. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi :34  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Even-Zohar, Itamar, Elias J. Torres Feijó & Antonio Monegal
2019. The End of Literature; or, What Purposes Does It Continue to Serve?. Poetics Today 40:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Farmer, Harry & Lara Maister
2017. Putting Ourselves in Another’s Skin: Using the Plasticity of Self-Perception to Enhance Empathy and Decrease Prejudice. Social Justice Research 30:4  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Fernandez-Quintanilla, Carolina & Fransina Stradling
2023. Introduction: stylistic approaches to narrative empathy. Journal of Literary Semantics 52:2  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Fialho, Olivia & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. What is literature for? The role of transformative reading. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1  pp. 1692532 ff. DOI logo
Gabrielsen, Ida Lodding & Marte Blikstad-Balas
2020. Hvilken litteratur møter elevene i norskfaget?. Edda 107:2  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Gasser, Luciano, Yvonne Dammert & P. Karen Murphy
2022. How Do Children Socially Learn from Narrative Fiction: Getting the Lesson, Simulating Social Worlds, or Dialogic Inquiry?. Educational Psychology Review 34:3  pp. 1445 ff. DOI logo
Gerrig, Richard J.
2023. Processes and products of readers’ journeys to narrative worlds. Discourse Processes 60:4-5  pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Girnth, Heiko & Stefan Burggraf
2019. Narration und Persuasion in der politischen Rede. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 49:1  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Hakemulder, Frank
2022. Empirical Pedagogical Stylistics: Reader Response Research in the Classroom. In Pedagogical Stylistics in the 21st Century,  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Hakemulder, Frank, Olivia Fialho & Matthijs P. Bal
2016. Chapter 2. Learning from literature. In Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 24],  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Hakemulder, Jemeljan F.
2004. Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers' Perception. Discourse Processes 38:2  pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Hanauer, David I.
2018. Intermediate states of literariness. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Harits, Imron Wakhid
2017. Comparative Children Literature: Aesthetic and Didactic Context. e-Pedagogium 17:2  pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Harits, Imron Wakhid, Stefan Chudy, Alena Opletalova & Dana Vicherkova
2015. Vicarious Experience by Modeling and Comparing of Children Stories from Czech and Madura Island: Behavior and Moral Perspectives. Creative Education 06:07  pp. 683 ff. DOI logo
Iosifyan, Marina & Judith Wolfe
2024. Everyday Life vs Art: Effects of Framing on the Mode of Object Interpretation. Empirical Studies of the Arts 42:1  pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Jarvis, Christine
2012. Fiction, empathy and lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education 31:6  pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Jaén, Isabel
2018. Fictions of Human Development: Renaissance Cognitive Philosophy and the Romance. In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Literature,  pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Jaén Portillo, Isabel
2024. From body to world: empathy and the transformative power of cinematic imagination. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 18 DOI logo
Karam, Khaled Mostafa & Helmy Elfiel
2021. An Experimental Appraisal of the Acquisition of Creative Literary Compression versus Descriptive Texts. Creativity Research Journal 33:2  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Kendal, Evie
2022. Science fiction in bioethics: a role for feminist narratology. Medical Humanities 48:3  pp. e12 ff. DOI logo
Kevane, Michael
2020. Reading Fiction and Economic Preferences of Rural Youth in Burkina Faso. Economic Development and Cultural Change 68:3  pp. 1041 ff. DOI logo
Kidd, David & Emanuele Castano
2019. Reading Literary Fiction and Theory of Mind: Three Preregistered Replications and Extensions of Kidd and Castano (2013). Social Psychological and Personality Science 10:4  pp. 522 ff. DOI logo
Kidd, David, Martino Ongis & Emanuele Castano
2016. On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature 6:1  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Király, Hajnal
2020. Arrested and Arresting: Intermedial Images and the Self-Reflexive Spectator of Contemporary Cinema. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies 18:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Kneeskern, Ellen E. & Patricia A. Reeder
2022. Examining the impact of fiction literature on children’s gender stereotypes. Current Psychology 41:3  pp. 1472 ff. DOI logo
Koek, Martijn, Tanja Janssen, Frank Hakemulder & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2016. Literary reading and critical thinking. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy)
2018. Does Originality Evoke Understanding? The Relation between Literary Reading and Empathy. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Korthals Altes, Liesbeth & Hanna Meretoja
2018. Ethics and Literature. In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophy and Literature,  pp. 601 ff. DOI logo
Krijnen, Tonny & Marc Verboord
2016. TV genres’ moral value: The moral reflection of segmented TV audiences. The Social Science Journal 53:4  pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Kuiken, Don, Leah Phillips, Michelle Gregus, David S. Miall, Mark Verbitsky & Anna Tonkonogy
2004. Locating Self-Modifying Feelings Within Literary Reading. Discourse Processes 38:2  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Kuplen, Mojca
2021. Therapeutic Self-knowledge in Narrative Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 55:1  pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
Kuzmičová, Anežka, Anne Mangen, Hildegunn Støle & Anne Charlotte Begnum
2017. Literature and readers’ empathy: A qualitative text manipulation study. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:2  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Lenhart, Jan, Tobias Richter, Markus Appel & Raymond A. Mar
2023. Adolescent leisure reading and its longitudinal association with prosocial behavior and social adjustment. Scientific Reports 13:1 DOI logo
Levy, Daniel & Avichai Snir
2017. Potterian Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Levy, Daniel & Avichai Snir
2022. Potterian economics. Oxford Open Economics 1 DOI logo
Lewis, Michael Jay
2017. The Myth Isn’t Mine but Its Fictionality Is: Alger’sRagged Dick, Twain/Beach’s “Stephen Girard,” and the Reader in Training. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 28:4  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Liao, Shen‐yi & Tamar Szabó Gendler
2011. Pretense and imagination. WIREs Cognitive Science 2:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Mancing, Howard & Jennifer Marston William
2022. Cognitive Literary Studies. In Restoring the Human Context to Literary and Performance Studies [Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance, ],  pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Mar, Raymond A.
2018. Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes 55:5-6  pp. 454 ff. DOI logo
Mar, Raymond A.
2018. Stories and the Promotion of Social Cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 27:4  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Mar, Raymond A. & Keith Oatley
2008. The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3:3  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Mastellotto, Lynn
2018. Dwelling in difference: narratives of arrival and accommodation. Studies in Travel Writing 22:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Małecki, Wojciech, Bogusław Pawłowski, Piotr Sorokowski & Edna Hillmann
2016. Literary Fiction Influences Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare. PLOS ONE 11:12  pp. e0168695 ff. DOI logo
Meindl, Peter, Abigail Quirk & Jesse Graham
2018. Best Practices for School-Based Moral Education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Mendelson-Maoz, Adia
2007. Ethics and Literature: Introduction. Philosophia 35:2  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Mengozzi, Chiara
2018. Aux frontières de l’humanité : (in)efficacité de l’empathie et de l’expérience esthétique. AUC PHILOLOGICA 2018:3  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Meretoja, Hanna
2016. Fiction, History and the Possible. Orbis Litterarum 71:5  pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Mumper, Micah L. & Richard J. Gerrig
2019. How Does Leisure Reading Affect Social Cognitive Abilities?. Poetics Today 40:3  pp. 453 ff. DOI logo
Nemegeer, Guylian
2023. Ilja Leonard Pfeijffer’s Literary Resistance to Right-Wing Populist Discourse in Grand Hotel Europa (2018). Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nicholes, Justin
2020. Science fiction prototyping’s features and impact on college students’ perceptions of writing. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Oatley, Keith, Robin Dunbar & Felix Budelmann
2018. Imagining Possible Worlds. Review of General Psychology 22:2  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
2023. An Analysis of the Movie “Hachiko: A Dog’s Story” in Terms of Empathy and Solidarity with Animals. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 15:4  pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Pettersson, Anders
2012. Literature and Cognitive Enrichment. In The Concept of Literary Application,  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Polvinen, Merja, Howard Sklar & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. Mimetic and synthetic views of characters: How readers process “people” in fiction. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1  pp. 1687257 ff. DOI logo
Rosenthal, Victor
2022. Littérature et vie. Revue du MAUSS n° 58:2  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Samur, Dalya, Mattie Tops & Sander L. Koole
2018. Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion 32:1  pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Scapin, Giulia, Cristina Loi, Frank Hakemulder, Katalin Bálint & Elly Konijn
2023. The role of processing foregrounding in empathic reactions in literary reading. Discourse Processes 60:4-5  pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Schnell, Cornelia & Helena K. Bilandzic
2017. Television Stories and the Cultivation of Moral Reasoning: The Role of Genre Exposure and Narrative Engageability. Journal of Media Ethics 32:4  pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Schrijvers, Marloes, Tanja Janssen, Olivia Fialho & Gert Rijlaarsdam
2019. Gaining Insight Into Human Nature: A Review of Literature Classroom Intervention Studies. Review of Educational Research 89:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Serrao, Fabrizio, Alice Chirico, Alessandro Gabbiadini, Alberto Gallace & Andrea Gaggioli
2024. Enjoying art: an evolutionary perspective on the esthetic experience from emotion elicitors. Frontiers in Psychology 15 DOI logo
Shalom, Maya & Zehavit Gross
2022. The Link Between Memory, Narrative and Empathy in Teaching Difficult Knowledge in Holocaust Education. Frontiers in Education 7 DOI logo
Shalom, Maya, Efrat Luzzatto & Zehavit Gross
2024. Remember lest we forget: the link between long-term memory and narrative, empathy and previous knowledge in Israel. Israel Affairs 30:2  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Shek-Noble, Liz
2022. Teaching Australia and Japan through Richard Flanagan’s The Narrow Road to the Deep North. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 58:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Sklar, Howard
2009. Narrative Structuring of Sympathetic Response: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to Toni Cade Bambara's “The Hammer Man”. Poetics Today 30:3  pp. 561 ff. DOI logo
Smeyers, Paul
2005. The Labouring Sleepwalker: Evocation and expression as modes of qualitative educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37:3  pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Ann Kowal, Capria Jaussen & Karen R. Nestor
2020. The seminar goes to work: Towards a theory of collaborative literacy. Industry and Higher Education 34:4  pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Somogyvári, Ildikó & János László
2012. The effects of categorial empathy on the reception of a historical short story. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 67:3  pp. 541 ff. DOI logo
Stamkou, Eftychia & Dacher Keltner
2020. Aesthetic Revolution: The Role of Art in Culture and Social Change. SSRN Electronic Journal DOI logo
Sukalla, Freya
2023. Narrative Persuasion – theoretische Ansätze und empirische Ergebnisse zur Überzeugungskraft von Narrationen. Soziale Passagen 15:1  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Suprawati, Maria N., Simone Volet & Deborah Pino-Pasternak
2020. How effort towards challenge is depicted in stories for young children: an Indonesian study. Asia Pacific Education Review 21:2  pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Szabó Dr., Erzsébet
2022. Negatív érzelmek Kafka Az Átváltozás című művében és a mű olvasásakor. nCOGNITO - Kognitív Kultúraelméleti Közlemények 1:2  pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Thexton, Todd, Ajnesh Prasad & Albert J. Mills
2019. Learning empathy through literature. Culture and Organization 25:2  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Troscianko, Emily T. & James Carney
2021. Drawing Kafka’s Castle . Scientific Study of Literature 11:1  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Tselenti, Danai, Daniel Cardoso & Joana Carvalho
2024.  Constructing Sexual Victimization: A Thematic Analysis of Reader Responses to A Literary Female-on-Male Rape Story on Goodreads . The Journal of Sex Research 61:3  pp. 374 ff. DOI logo
2021. Edebiyat ve Duygular: Öyküleyici Metinleri Anlamada Duyguların Rolü. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi 9:2  pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Turner, Rose & Fatima M. Felisberti
2018. Relationships between fiction media, genre, and empathic abilities. Scientific Study of Literature 8:2  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Turner, Rose & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
2020. Fiction effects on social cognition. Scientific Study of Literature 10:1  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
van Peer, Willie & Aikaterini Nousi
2007. What Reading Does to Readers: Stereotypes, Foregrounding and Language Learning. In Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners,  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Vernay, Jean-François
2023. II. Quand la fiction dope le cerveau social : empathie, éthique, esthétique et le pouvoir mélioratif de la fiction littéraire. In Explorations cognitivistes de la théorie et la fiction littéraires ,  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Wallace, Cynthia R.
2021. Reading in the Wake: Empathy Debates, “The Reader,” and Toni Morrison’sGod Help the Child. University of Toronto Quarterly 90:4  pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Weidle, Roland
2022. „What do you read, my lord?“: Aufgaben und Möglichkeiten einer anglistischen Literaturwissenschaft. In 200 Jahre Nationalphilologien [Abhandlungen zur Literaturwissenschaft, ],  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Weidle, Roland
2023. “What do you read, my lord?”: Purposes and Potential of English Literary Studies. In 200 Years of National Philologies,  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Weng, Cathy, Kifle Kassaw, Pei-Shan Tsai & Tsai-Ju Lee
2024. Does scratch animation for sustainable development goals (SDGs) with AI-comics impact on student empathy, self-efficacy, scriptwriting, and animation skills?. Education and Information Technologies DOI logo
Whalen, D. H., Lisa Zunshine, Evelyne Ender, Eugenia Kelbert, Jason Tougaw, Robert F. Barsky, Peter Steiner & Michael Holquist
2016. Validating judgments of perspective embedding. Scientific Study of Literature 6:2  pp. 278 ff. DOI logo
Willems, Roel M.
2023. MA-EM: A neurocognitive model for understanding mixed and ambiguous emotions and morality. Cognitive Neuroscience 14:2  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Wimmer, Lena, Gregory Currie, Stacie Friend & Heather J. Ferguson
2021. The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition. Scientific Study of Literature 11:2  pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Wimmer, Lena, Stacie Friend, Gregory Currie & Heather J. Ferguson
2021. Reading Fictional Narratives to Improve Social and Moral Cognition: The Influence of Narrative Perspective, Transportation, and Identification. Frontiers in Communication 5 DOI logo
Zeng, Ruoyan & Ellen Winner
2022. Preaching to the Choir and Beyond. Scientific Study of Literature 12:1-2  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2011. Bibliography. In Such Stuff as Dreams,  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.


Consciousness Research

Consciousness research

Literature & Literary Studies

Theoretical literature & literary studies



Main BIC Subject

JMT: States of consciousness

Main BISAC Subject

PSY020000: PSYCHOLOGY / Neuropsychology
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  00027895 | Marc record