Cover not available
Part of
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 1–36

Voice in Baltic

An overview

 | Vilnius University
 | University of Warsaw
Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.002int
References (51)
Ackema, Peter & Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 2006. Middles. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 131–203. Malden: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Yu. 2011. Causatives which do not cause: Non-valency-increasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Yu. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon, 86–142. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian, eds. 2013. Non-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 205]. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1990. Sravnitel’nyj sintaksis pričastij baltijskix jazykov [A Comparative Syntax of Participles in Baltic]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas, et al. 1997. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Andronov, Aleksej. 2000. Some remarks on the system of Lithuanian and Latvian conjugation. Linguistica Baltica 8: 35–47.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. 2013. From transitivity to aspect: Causative-inchoative alternation and its extensions in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 4: 39–77.Google Scholar
Arumaa, Peeter. 1957. Von der Eigenart des Ablauts und der Diathese im Baltischen. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 26: 118–149.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P. 2003. Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39: 473‒520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cibuļs, Jurs & Leikuma, Lidija. 2003. Vasals! Latgaliešu valodas mācība [Manual of Latgalian]. [Rīga:] n.i.m.s.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 2000. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax, and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2000. Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, eds. 2000. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]. 1922. Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Gulbis.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1987. The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin etc.: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian). In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language, 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 29–61. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative / causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series, 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Calude, Andreea & Spagnol, Michael & Narrog, Heiko & Bamyacı, Elif. 2014. Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: a form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50 (3): 587–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel. 2000. Reflexiva typu słowiańskiego w pewnej gwarze górnołotewskiej [Reflexives of the Slavonic type in a High Latvian dialect]. In Kontakty językowe polszczyzny na pograniczu wschodnim. Prace ofiarowane Profesorowi Januszowi Riegerowi, Ewa Wolnicz-Pawłowska & Wanda Szulowska (eds), 97–102. Warsaw: Semper.Google Scholar
. 2001a. Studies in the Latvian Verb. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic. In The Circum-Baltic Languages. Typology and Contact. Vol. 2: Grammar and Typology [Studies in Languages Companion Series, 55], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 363–389. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Mood and Modality in Baltic. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel & Nau, Nicole. 2014. Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 1–41. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalnača, Andra & Lokmane, Ilze. 2012. The semantics and distribution of Latvian reflexive verbs. In Multiple Perspectives in Linguistic Research on Baltic languages, Aurelija Usonienė, Nicole Nau & Ineta Dabašinskienė (eds.), 229–256. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. 1, Clause Structure, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehayov, Petar & Vihman, Virve. 2014. The lure of lability: a synchronic and diachronic investigation of the labile pattern in Estonian. Linguistics 52 (4): 1061–1105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzan. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language, 23]. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kittillä, Seppo. 2011. Transitivity typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Song, Jae Jung (ed.), 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I. 2011. Voice typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Song, Jae Jung (ed.), 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2014. Introduction [to the special issue on labile verbs]. Linguistics 52(4): 871–877.Google Scholar
Lavine, James E. 2006. Is there a passive evidential strategy in Lithuanian? In Papers from the 42nd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , Jacqueline Bunting et al. (eds), 41–55.
Letuchiy, Alexander. 2009. Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges in Typology. Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Alexandre Arkhipov & Patience Epps (eds.), 223–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin & Solstad, Torgrim, eds. 2006. Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 96]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 1993. The inflectional category of voice: towards a more rigorous definition. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series, 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 1–46. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds), 84–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nau, Nicole. 1998. Latvian (Languages of the World/Materials, 217). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1969. Nekotorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazovanii [Some likely universals in verbal word formation]. In Jazykovye universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, Igor’ F. Vardul’ (ed.), 106–114. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, V.P. & G.G. Silnitsky. 1973. The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 1–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1993. Transitive and causative in the Slavic lexicon: Evidence from Russian. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series, 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 69–86. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8: 149–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski, Norbert. 2006. Studia z historii czasownika litewskiego. Iteratiwa, denominatiwa [Studies in the History of the Lithuanian Verb. Iteratives, Denominatives]. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Pakerys, Jurgis. 2012. On the typology of recent verbal borrowings in Baltic. Paper read at the 45th Annual Meeting of the SLE, Stockholm, August 2012.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61 (4): 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Voice parameters. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers Presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 117–138. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stang, Christian S. 1942. Das slavische und baltische Verbum. Skriften utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps Akademi i Oslo. II. Historisk-Filosofisk Klasse. 1942, I. Oslo: Dybwad.Google Scholar
. 1966. Vergleichende Grammatik der Baltischen Sprachen. Oslo etc.: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1982. The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 508–524.
Veidemane, Ruta. 2002. Darbības vārds [The verb]. In Latviešu literārās valodas morfoloģiskās sistēmas attīstība: Lokāmās vārdšķiras, Kornēlija Pokrotniece (ed.), 409–509. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2006. Relations between actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language, 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 274–309. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The World Atlas of Transitivity Pairs. 2014. Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. (Available online at: [URL])Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. Forthcoming. Valency-changing word-formation. Draft of May 2012. To appear in Handbook of Word-Formation, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen, & Franz Rainer (eds.). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logo
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016. Introduction. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.