Cover not available
Part of
World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016
► pp. 143–172

(Semi-)modals of necessity in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes

In Standard Englishes the semi-modals need (to), want to and have to are gaining ground over central modals such as must (Leech 2013, for example). As a means of exploring the status of these verbs in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes, this paper analyses must, need (to), want to and have to from both a syntactic and a semantic point of view based on examples found in the International Corpus of English (ICE-HK and ICE-IND). It also compares these with examples drawn from the British English component of the ICE project (ICE-GB). Findings show that: (a) semantically, the behaviour of these (semi-) modals differs considerably from one variety to another; (b) the degree of grammaticalization of the semi-modals is lower in Indian English than in the other varieties; and (c) colloquialization and grammaticalization operate synergetically in the replacement of modals with semi-modals.
Keywords: Asian Englishes, colloquialization, grammaticalization, necessity, semi-modals
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g57.07lou
References (54)
Aarts, Bas. 2011. Shifts in English modal verb usage in recent times. Plenary lecture presented at the 44 Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea . Logroño, Spain.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41: 104–134.Google Scholar
Biewer, Carolin. 2009. Modals and semi-modals of obligation and necessity in South Pacific Englishes. Anglistik 20(2): 41–55.Google Scholar
. 2011. Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective. In Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 7–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1980. Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. In Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburstag von Hansjakob Seiler, Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds), 292–299. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 1978. Dare and need in Australian English: A study of divided usage. English Studies 59: 434–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Grammatical variation in English worldwide: the role of colloquialization. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8(3): 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Grammatical colloquialism and the English quasi-modals: a comparative study. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 155–169. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2007. On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45(1): 37–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2007–. TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s. <[URL]>.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin, Hackert, Stephanie & Hilbert, Michaela. 2012. Will and would in selected New Englishes: General vs. variety-specific tendencies. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–102. Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie, Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin & Hilbert, Michaela. 2013. Modals of possibility, ability and permission in selected New Englishes. eVarieng 13.<[URL]> (29 September 2014).
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1976. Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua 40: 331–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey, et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 1998. New Zealand Grammar. Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-Based Study in Morpho­syntactic Variation [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Randolph Quirk & Henry Widdowson (eds), 11–36. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The modals ARE declining. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4): 547–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2012. Speech-act participants in modality. Unpublished manuscript. <[URL]> (29 September 2014).
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2009. The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750–1710). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2012. On the relationship between subjectification, grammaticalization and constructions. Evidence from the history of English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2): 232–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. ­Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2008. World Englishes. The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Millar, Neil. 2009. Modal verbs in TIME. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 191–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John. 1995. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33: 157–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili. 2006. The semantic variation of NEED TO in four recent British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(1): 29–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1997. Scope and the development of epistemic modality: Evidence from ought to . English Language and Linguistics 1: 295–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2003. Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 241–266. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2007. The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide 28: 47–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 2: 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. ­Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Noël, Dirk & De Wit, Astrid. 2012. The diverging need (to)’s of Asian Englishes. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 54–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verplaetse, Heidi. 1999. The expression of volition in political interviews reconsidered. Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 91–117.Google Scholar
. 2003. What you and I want: a functional approach to verb complementation of modal WANT TO. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 151–189. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R. 1993. English Auxiliaries. Structure and History. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westney, Paul. 1995. Modals and Periphrastics in English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard. 2009. Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes 28(4): 421–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Nie, Chunyuan
2024. Exploring variation in English as a lingua franca: Multivariate analysis of modal verbs of obligation and necessity in the VOICE corpus. ICAME Journal 48:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2021. Linguistic democratization in HKE across registers: The effects of prescriptivism. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
LOUREIRO‐PORTO, LUCÍA
2017. ICE vs GloWbE: Big data and corpus compilation. World Englishes 36:3 ► pp. 448 ff. DOI logo
Brato, Thorsten
2019. Chapter 1.5. The historical corpus of English in Ghana (HiCE Ghana). In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Brato, Thorsten
2020. Noun phrase complexity in Ghanaian English. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.