Cover not available
Part of
The Dynamics of English in Namibia: Perspectives on an emerging variety
Edited by Anne Schröder
[Varieties of English Around the World G65] 2021
► pp. 169–194

Chapter 8
The question of structural nativization in Namibian English

Some answers from extended uses of the progressive

| TU Dortmund University
The question of whether the English as spoken in Namibia can be considered a (second-language) variety or should rather be considered a learner English was first addressed in Buschfeld and Kautzsch (2014). The present study approaches this question from a quantitative perspective, focusing on the use of progressive morphology (i.e., verb+ing) in Namibian English (NamE). The findings suggest that NamE is characterized by local and innovative, extended uses of progressive marking. I discuss whether these can be considered nativized features and conclude that this is a complex question in which a variety of factors have to be considered, most importantly the fact that NamE is not a monolithic whole but stratified along the lines of speakers’ ages and ethnicities.
Keywords: Namibian English, structural nativization, EFL, ESL, progressive marking
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Contextualizing the progressive: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives
  • 3.Progressive marking and the question of structural nativization in Namibian English(es)
    • 3.1Some remarks on structural nativization
    • 3.2Data collection and participants
    • 3.3Data analysis
    • 3.4Results
  • 4.Discussion of results
  • 5.Conclusion: Structural nativization in NamE?
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g65.08bus
References (60)
References
Bernaisch, Tobias, Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Blevins, Margaret. 2018. Towards a constructional analysis of the progressive aspect in Texas German. In Constructions in Contact: Constructional Perspectives on Contact Phenomena in Germanic Languages [Constructional Approaches to Language 24], Hans C. Boas & Steffen Höder (eds), 73–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breed, Adri. 2017. Periphrastic progressive constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A contrastive analysis. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 29(4): 305–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah. 2013. English in Cyprus or Cyprus English? An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status [Varieties of English Around the World G46]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah & Kautzsch, Alexander. 2014. English in Namibia: A first approach. English World-Wide 35(2): 121–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 36(1): 104–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter. 2008. The progressive aspect in World Englishes: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 225–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Recent diachronic change in the progressive in Philippine English. In Collins (ed.), 271–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2015. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. A Grammar of Irish English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert & Gut, Ulrike. 2015. An apparent time study of the progressive in Nigerian English. In Collins (ed.), 373–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. 1976. A Nama Grammar: The Noun-Phrase. MA thesis, published by the University of Cape Town, South Africa. <[URL]> (27 September 2020).
2006. Syntactic focus marking in Khoekhoe (“Nama/Damara”). ZAS Papers in Linguistics 46: 105–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie, Laube, Alexander & Wengler, Diana. 2020. English in the Bahamas and developmental models of World Englishes: A critical analysis. In Modelling World Englishes: A Joint Approach to Postcolonial and Non-Postcolonial Varieties, Sarah Buschfeld & Alexander Kautzsch (eds), 251–273. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Hornik, Kurt & Zeileis, Achim. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3): 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, Aafke C. J. & Müller, Natascha. 2000. Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 227–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2004. Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in modern English. English Language and Linguistics 8(1): 47–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Vogel, Katrin. 2011. Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction? In Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 145–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Rautionaho, Paula & Strobl, Carolin. 2020. Progressive or simple? A corpus-based study of aspect in World Englishes. Corpora 15(1): 77–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kautzsch, Alexander & Schröder, Anne. 2016. English in multilingual and multiethnic Namibia: Some evidence on language attitudes and on the pronunciation of vowels. In Anglistentag Paderborn 2015: Proceedings, Christoph Ehland, Ilka Mindt & Merle Tönnies (eds), 277–288. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Kautzsch, Alexander, Schröder, Anne & Zähres, Frederic. 2017. The phonetics of Namibian English: Investigating local features in a global context. Paper presented at the IAWE Conference, Syracuse NY.Google Scholar
Kirk, John M. 2015. The progressive in Irish English: Looking both ways? In Collins (ed.), 87–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Klerk, Vivian & Gough, David. 2002. Black South African English. In Language in South Africa, Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 356–78. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2010. Variation across Englishes: Syntax. In English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A Multilingual Model, Andy Kirkpatrick (ed), 400–424. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds). 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (15 February 2019).
Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. Global synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in English. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, Bernd Kortmann, Edgar W. Schneider, Clive Upton, Kate Burridge & Rajend Mesthrie (eds), 1142–1202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1: 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laporte, Samantha. 2012. Mind the gap: Bridge between world and learner Englishes in the making. English Text Construction 5: 264–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian, & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2003. Kreolismen und verbales Identitätsmanagement im geschriebenen jamaicanischen Englisch. In Zwischen Ausgrenzung und Hybridisierung, Elisabeth Vogel, Antonia Napp & Wolfram Lutterer (eds), 79–96. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Hundt, Marianne. 1995. “Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English?” A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43: 111–122.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Leech, Geoffrey. 2006. Current changes in English syntax. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makalela, Leketi. 2004. Making sense of BSAE for linguistic democracy in South Africa. World Englishes 23(3): 355–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meriläinen, Lea. 2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36(4): 760–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meriläinen, Lea, Paulasto, Heli & Rautionaho, Paula. 2017. Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives, Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, Anna Mauranen & Svetlana Vetchinnikova (eds), 676–696. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G. & Kavari, Jekura U. 2008. Reference Grammar of Herero (Otjiherero): Bantu Language of Namibia. With a Glossary Otjiherero-English-Otjiherero [Southern African Languages and Cultures 3]. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Paulasto, Heli. 2006. Welsh English Syntax: Contact and Variation. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes. English World-Wide 35(3): 247–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Pottelberge, Jeroen. 2004. Der am-Progressiv: Struktur und parallele Entwicklung in den kontinentalwestgermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus. 2006. The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 25(1): 37–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Progressive aspect and stative verbs in Outer Circle varieties. World Englishes 11(2): 157–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus & Piotrowska, Caroline. 2015. The development of an extended time period meaning of the progressive in Black South African English. In Collins (ed.), 465–484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salles Bernal, Soluna. 2015. Synchronic analysis of the progressive aspect in three varieties of Asian Englishes. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 51: 87–107.Google Scholar
Schilk, Marco & Hammel, Marc. 2014. The progressive in South Asian and Southeast Asian varieties of English – mapping areal homogeneity and heterogeneity. Language and Computers 78(1): 147–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmied, Josef. 1991. English in Africa. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2006. East African Englishes. In The Handbook of World Englishes, Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru & Cecil L. Nelson (eds), 188–202. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Anne & Schneider, Klaus P. 2018. Variational pragmatics, responses to thanks, and the specificity of English in Namibia. English World-Wide 39(3): 338–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Anne & Zähres, Frederic. 2020. English in Namibia: Multilingualism and ethnic variation in the Extra- and Intraterritorial Forces Model. In Modelling World Englishes: A Joint Approach to Postcolonial and Non-Postcolonial Varieties, Sarah Buschfeld & Alexander Kautzsch (eds), 38–62. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Anne, Frederic Zähres & Alexander Kautzsch. 2020. Ethnic variation in the phonology of Namibian English: A first approach to Baster English. English World-Wide 41(2): 193–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2009. Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide 30(2): 170–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ssempuuma, Jude, Bebwa Isingoma & Christiane Meierkord. 2016. The use of the progressive in Ugandan English. In Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalising Post-protectorate [Varieties of English Around the World G59], Christiane Meierkord, Bebwa Isingoma & Saudah Namyalo (eds), 173–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Heller, Benedikt & Röthlisberger, Melanie. 2016. Around the world in three alternations: modelling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Baayen, Harald. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24: 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Gary M. 2004. Mining with rarity: A unifying framework. ACM SIGKDD Explorations 6(1): 7–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zähres, Frederic. 2016. A case study of code-switching in multilingual Namibian keyboard-to-screen communication. 10plus 1 2: 31–46.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Stell, Gerald
2023. Native languages and aspect-marking in New Englishes: The (im)perfective in Namibian English. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.